Filter results

Results (1)

Sort by:

Select all Select all

Page 1

No access

Select

Enrico Zoffoli

Beyond Consensus

Series: Studies in Political Theory

Volume 4 2013

Results in this title

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis S. 2-10

a Varieties of liberalism S. 11-13

b Justificatory liberalism S. 13-20

a Consensus and convergence S. 20-24

b Overview of the argument S. 24-28

c Content and method S. 28-32

Overview of the argument S. 33-34

The Principle of Political Liberty S. 34-38

Some misgivings about the presumption in favor of liberty S. 38-42

The site of public reason S. 42-44

Rejecting the Derivative Justification Thesis S. 44-46

The principle of public justification S. 46-48

The concept of public justification and its conceptions S. 48-49

Strong and weak consensus S. 49-53

Private and public reasons S. 53-54

Three levels of publicness S. 54-56

The role of religious reasons S. 56-61

Rawls on the overlapping consensus S. 61-63

Deepening the problem S. 63-66

Two kinds of defeaters S. 66-69

Conclusive justification S. 69-71

The Conclusiveness Thesis S. 71-73

A first presumption in favor of convergence S. 73-74

The Freestandingness Thesis S. 74-76

Procedures of abstraction S. 76-79

Undermined freestanding reasons are not shareable S. 79-81

Rebutted freestanding reasons are not shareable S. 81-84

Suspended freestanding reasons are not shareable S. 84-85

Weak Shareability Requirement? S. 85-88

A twofold presumption in favor of convergence S. 88-90

A challenge for consensus S. 90-91

Strength-based arguments for consensus S. 91-93

Appropriateness-based arguments for consensus S. 93-95

Limits of appropriateness-based arguments for consensus S. 95-96

Summary S. 96-98

Overview of the argument S. 99-100

Public reasons as objective reasons S. 100-103

Four strength-based arguments for consensus S. 103-106

The basic argument S. 106-110

Strong externalism S. 110-112

Moderate externalism S. 112-114

Internalism S. 114-117

Open vs. closed justification S. 117

Open justification and internal coherence S. 117-120

Rejecting the top-down argument for consensus S. 120-122

The basic (radical) argument S. 122-125

Some important remarks S. 125-127

Post-metaphysical objectivity S. 127-129

Ethical discourses and open justification S. 129-133

Are private reasons necessarily defeated? S. 133-134

Validity claims S. 134-137

The asymmetry between rightness claims and truth claims S. 137-140

A discourse-theoretical approach to universalization S. 140-143

Discourse theory and epistemic pluralism S. 143-144

Rejecting some major arguments for consensus S. 144-146

A more moderate defense of consensus? S. 146-149

The (alleged) priority of freestanding reasons S. 149-151

What defeats what? S. 151-154

Back to post-metaphysical rationality S. 154-156

The scope of private defeaters S. 156-158

Summary S. 158-160

Overview of the argument S. 161-162

The argument from sincerity S. 162-166

Intelligibility and relevance S. 166-169

Why the sincerity requirement undermines convergence S. 169-173

Why the sincerity requirement does not justify consensus S. 173-176

The role of moral epistemology S. 176-179

The Commonsense View of Shareability S. 179-182

The Meta-Convergence View of Shareability S. 182-184

The Political View of Shareability S. 184-186

The value of full publicity S. 186-190

The role of the public sphere S. 190-191

Full publicity as a justificatory device S. 191-194

The argument from normative stability S. 194-198

The argument from reasonable compliance S. 198-202

Framing the issue S. 202-205

The Strong Burden Thesis and the Weak Burden Thesis S. 205-207

Freestanding rationales and general interests S. 207-210

Why the argument from symmetry seems appealing S. 210-212

Why the argument from symmetry is misguided S. 212-215

The Non-Coercive Rejection Thesis S. 215-216

Contested property rights S. 216-218

When liberty is not an available default S. 218-221

The narrow symmetry objection S. 221-223

The Symmetrical Convergence View of Public Reason S. 223-225

Against public reason’s Shareability Requirement S. 225-226

A further problem S. 226-231

Summary S. 231-232

Conclusion S. 233-240

Bibliography S. 241-249

doi.org/10.5771/9783845247960

1