Politicians' Expressions of Anger and Leadership Evaluations

Schlagworte

Leadership Bürger Wahlkampf Bundeskanzler Politische Psychologie Politiker Wahlforschung Merkel Bundeskanzlerin Kanzler Parteivorsitzende

Keywords

election campaign electoral Research Federal Chancellor Politicians chancellor citizen party chairman political psychology

• Bibliography
• References
• Abadie, Alberto, Diamond, Alexis & Hainmueller, Jens (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(490): 493–505. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746.
• Abadie, Alberto, Diamond, Alexis & Hainmueller, Jens (2015). Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method. American Journal of Political Science 59(2): 495–510. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12116.
• Abelson, Robert P., Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D. & Fiske, Susan T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(4): 619–630. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.619.
• Akçali, Emel & Korkut, Umut (2012). Geographical Metanarratives in East-Central Europe: Neo-Turanism in Hungary. Eurasian Geography and Economics 53(5): 596–614. doi: 10.2747/1539-7216.53.5.596.
• Allison, Paul D. (1999). Multiple Regression: A Primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
• Aristotle (1934). Nicomachean Ethics1162a, and V. I. I. I. Book: Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Vol. 19, translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Armstrong, J. Scott & Graefe, Andreas (2011). Predicting elections from biographical information about candidates: A test of the index method. Journal of Business Research 64(7): 699–706. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.08.005.
• Arzheimer, Kai (2017). Another Dog that didn’t Bark? Less Dealignment and more Partisanship in the 2013 Bundestag Election. German Politics 26(1): 49–64. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2016.1266481.
• Ashworth, Scott & Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan (2008). Electoral Selection, Strategic Challenger Entry, and the Incumbency Advantage. The Journal of Politics 70(4): 1006–1025. doi: 10.1017/S0022381608081024.
• Bailenson, Jeremy N., Iyengar, Shanto, Yee, Nick & Collins, Nathan A. (2008). Facial Similarity between Voters and Candidates Causes Influence. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(5): 935–961. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn064.
• Bakker, Bert N. & de Vreese, Claes H. (2016). Personality and European Union attitudes: Relationships across European Union attitude dimensions. European Union Politics 17(1): 25–45. doi: 10.1177/1465116515595885.
• Bakker, Bert N., Klemmensen, Robert, Nørgaard, Asbjørn S. & Schumacher, Gijs (2016b). Stay Loyal or Exit the Party? How Openness to Experience and Extroversion Explain Vote Switching. Political Psychology 37(3): 419–429. doi: 10.1111/pops.12257.
• Bakker, Bert N., Rooduijn, Matthijs & Schumacher, Gijs (2016a). The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research 55(2): 302–320. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12121.
• Bakker, Iris, van der Voordt, Theo, Vink, Peter & de Boon, Jan (2014). Pleasure, arousal, dominance: Mehrabian and Russell revisited. Current Psychology 33(3): 405–421. doi: 10.1007/s12144-014-9219-4.
• Ballew, Charles C. & Todorov, Alexander (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(46): 17948–17953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705435104.
• Banks, Antoine J. (2014). The public’s anger: White racial attitudes and opinions toward health care reform. Political Behavior 36(3): 493–514. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9251-3.
• Banks, Antoine J. & Valentino, Nicholas A. (2012). Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes. American Journal of Political Science 56(2): 286–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00561.x.
• Barrett, Lisa F. (2016). The Varieties of Anger. The New York Times. Available online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/opinion/sunday/the-varieties-of-anger.html (last accessed: 20 July 2019).
• Barrett, Lisa F. (2017). How Emotions are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. London: Macmillan.
• Barrett, Lisa F., Mesquita, Batja & Gendron, Maria (2011). Context in emotion perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20(5): 286–290. doi: 10.1177/0963721411422522.
• Bartels, Larry M. (1986). Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test. American Journal of Political Science 30(4): 709–728. doi: 10.2307/2111269.
• Bassel, Leah (2017). The Politics of Listening: Possibilities and Challenges for Democratic Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkenauer, Catrin & Vohs, Kathleen D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5(4): 323–370. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323.
• Beck, Ulrich & Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
• Behi, Ruhi & Nolan, Mike (1996). Causality and control: threats to internal validity. British Journal of Nursing 5(6): 374–377. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1996.5.6.374.
• Beierlein, Constanze, Kemper, Christoph J., Kovaleva, Anastassiya & Rammstedt, Beatrice (2012). Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung politischer Kompetenz- und Einflussüberzeugungen: Political Efficacy Kurzskala (PEKS). ZIS–GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim.
• Bell, Vaughan & O’Driscoll, Ciarán (2018). The network structure of paranoia in the general population. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 53(7): 737–744. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1487-0.
• Benjamin, Daniel J. & Shapiro, Jesse M. (2009). Thin-Slice Forecasts of Gubernatorial Elections. The Review of Economics and Statistics 91(33): 523–536. doi: 10.1162/rest.91.3.523.
• Benoit, William (2016). Functional Theory: Negative Campaigning in Political Television Spots. In Alessandro Nai & Annemarie S. Walter (eds.), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters, pp. 35–46. Colchester: ECPR Press.
• Berger, Jonah (2011). Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science 22(7): 891–893. doi: 10.1177/0956797611413294.
• Berggren, Niclas, Jordahl, Henrik & Poutvaara, Panu (2010). The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success. Journal of Public Economics 94(1/2): 8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.002.
• Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A. & Lenz, Gabriel S. (2012). Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20(3): 351–368. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057.
• Bieber, Ina E. & Bytzek, Evelyn (2012). Online-Umfragen: eine geeignete Erhebungsmethode für die Wahlforschung? ein Vergleich unterschiedlicher Befragungsmodi am Beispiel der Bundestagswahl 2009. Methoden, Daten, Analysen 6(2): 185–211.
• Bittner, Amanda (2011). Platform or personality? The role of party leaders in elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Blumenberg, Johannes N. & Blumenberg, Manuela S. (2017). The Kretschmann Effect: Personalisation and the March 2016 Länder Elections. German Politics 18(2): 1–21. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2017.1342814.
• Blumenstiel, Jan E. & Gavras, Konstantin L. (2015). Ursachen und Konsequenzen ambivalenter Einstellungen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 50: 418–443. doi: 10.5771/9783845254418-418.
• Bodenhausen, Galen V., Sheppard, Lori A. & Kramer, Geoffrey P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology 24(1): 45–62. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420240104.
• Bohannon, John (2016). Mechanical Turk upends social sciences. Science 352(6291): 1263–1264. doi: 10.1126/science.352.6291.1263.
• Bomann, Mieke H. & Jones, Quentin (2003). Information Overload. In David Levinson & Karen Christensen (eds.), Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World, pp. 660–663. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Brader, Ted (2005). Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions. American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 388–405. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x.
• Brader, Ted (2006). Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Brader, Ted (2011). The Political Relevance of Emotions: “Reassessing” Revisited. Political Psychology 32(2): 337–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00803.x.
• Brader, Ted & Marcus, George E. (2013). Emotion and Political Psychology. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 165–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bradley, Brendan P., Mogg, Karin, Falla, Sara J. & Hamilton, Lucy R. (1998). Attentional Bias for Threatening Facial Expressions in Anxiety: Manipulation of Stimulus Duration. Cognition and Emotion 12(6): 737–753. doi: 10.1080/026999398379411.
• Brettschneider, Frank & Gabriel, Oscar W. (2002). The nonpersonalization of voting behavior in Germany. In Anthony King (ed.), Leaders’ personalities and the outcomes of democratic elections, pp. 127–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Brooks, Deborah J. (2011). Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians. The Journal of Politics 73(2): 597–615. doi: 10.1017/S0022381611000053.
• Brouard, Sylvain & Kerrouche, Éric (2013). L’effet candidat lors des élections parlementaires. Revue française de science politique 63(6): 1113–1136. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.636.1113.
• Bryman, Alan (2012). Social Research Methods. 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bucy, Erik P. (2000). Emotional and Evaluative Consequences of Inappropriate Leader Displays. Communication Research 27(2): 194–226.
• Bucy, Erik P. (2011). Nonverbal communication, emotion, and political evaluation. In Katrin Döveling, Christian von Scheve & Elly A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media, pp. 195–220. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Bucy, Erik P. (2016). The look of losing, then and now: Nixon, Obama, and nonverbal indicators of opportunity lost. American Behavioral Scientist 60(14), 1772–1798. doi: 10.1177/0002764216678279.
• Bucy, Erik P. & Bradley, Samuel D. (2004). Presidential Expressions and Viewer Emotion: Counterempathic Responses to Televised Leader Displays. Social Science Information 43(1): 59–94. doi: 10.1177/05390184040689.
• Bucy, Erik P. & Grabe, Maria E. (2008). “Happy warriors” revisited: Hedonic and agonic display repertoires of presidential candidates on the evening news. Politics and the Life Sciences 27(1): 78–98. doi: 10.2990/27_1_78.
• Bucy, Erik P. & Newhagen, John E. (1999). The emotional appropriateness heuristic: Processing televised presidential reactions to the news. Journal of Communication 49(4): 59–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02817.x.
• Bühler, Karl (1990). Theory of language: The representational function of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
• Buhrmester, Michael, Kwang, Tracy & Gosling, Samuel D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1): 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980.
• Burns, Justine (2006). Racial stereotypes, stigma and trust in post-apartheid South Africa. Economic Modelling 23(5): 805–821. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2005.10.008.
• Campbell, Angus (1960). Surge and decline: A study of electoral change. Public Opinion Quarterly 24(3): 397–418. doi: 10.1086/266960.
• Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E. & Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Campbell, Donald T. & Stanley, Julian C. (1971). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. In Nathaniel L. Gage (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, pp. 171–246. Chicago, IL: McNally.
• Capelos, Tereza & Demertzis, Nicolas (2018). Political action and resentful affectivity in critical times. Humanity & Society 42(4): 410–433. doi: 10.1177/0160597618802517.
• Caprara, Gian V. & Vecchione, Michelle (2013). Personality Approaches to Political Behavior. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 23–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Carney, Dana R., Jost, John T., Gosling, Samuel D. & Potter, Jeff (2008). The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind. Political Psychology 29(6): 807–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x.
• Carpenter, Dick M., Webster, Marjory J. & Bowman, Chad K. (2019). White House Wit: How Presidents Use Humor as a Leadership Tool. Presidential Studies Quarterly 49(1): 23–55. doi: 10.1111/psq.12492.
• Carver, Charles S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion 4(1): 3–22. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.3.
• Carver, Charles S. (2006). Approach, avoidance, and the self-regulation of affect and action. Motivation and Emotion 30(2): 105–110. doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9044-7.
• Carver, Charles S. & Harmon-Jones, Eddie (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin 135(2): 183–204. doi: 10.1037/a0013965.
• Carver, Charles S., Sutton, Steven K. & Scheier, Michael F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(6): 741–751. doi: 10.1177/0146167200268008.
• Chong, Dennis (2013). Degrees of Rationality in Politics. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 96–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Clarke, Harold D., Elliott, Euel & Stewart, Marianne C. (2017). Heuristics, Heterogeneity and Green Choices Voting on California’s Proposition 23. Political Science Research and Methods 5(4): 755–774. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.39.
• Clough, Patricia T. & Halley, Jean (eds.) (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Cohen, Jacob (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Corbetta, Piergiorgio & Vignati, Rinaldo (2014). Direct Democracy and Scapegoats: The Five Star Movement and Europe. The International Spectator 49(1): 53–64. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2014.875822.
• Crivelli, Carlos & Fridlund, Alan J. (2018). Facial Displays Are Tools for Social Influence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences: 1–12. [Online First]. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.006.
• Cuddy, Amy J. C., Fiske, Susan T. & Glick, Peter (2008). Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40: 61–149. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0.
• Curtin, Richard, Presser, Stanley & Singer, Eleanor (2005). Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century. Public Opinion Quarterly 69(1): 87–98. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfi002.
• Dahl, Robert A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CI: Yale University Press.
• Dalege, Jonas, Borsboom, Denny, van Harreveld, Frenk, van den Berg, Helma, Conner, Mark & van der Maas, Han L.J. (2016). Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model. Psychological Review 123(1): 2–22. doi: 10.1037/a0039802.
• Dalege, Jonas, Borsboom, Denny, van Harreveld, Frenk, Waldorp, Lourens J. & van der Maas, Han L.J. (2017). Network Structure Explains the Impact of Attitudes on Voting Decisions. Scientific Reports 7(4909): 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05048-y.
• Dalton, Russell J. (1984). Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies. The Journal of Politics 46(1): 264–284. doi: 10.2307/2130444.
• Dalton, Russell J. (2002). The Decline of Party Identification. In Russell J. Dalton & Martin P. Wattenberg (eds.), Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies, pp. 19–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Dalton, Russell J. (2006). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. 4th edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
• Dalton, Russell J. (2014). Interpreting Partisan Dealignment in Germany. German Politics 23(1/2): 134–144. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2013.853040.
• Dalton, Russell J. & Bürklin, Wilhelm (2003). Wähler als Wandervögel: Dealignment and the German Voter. German Politics and Society 21(1): 57–75. doi: 10.3167/104503003782353592.
• Darwin, Charles (1965). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Davino, Cristina, Furno, Marilena & Vistocco, Domenico (2013). Quantile regression: Theory and applications. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
• De Landtsheer, De Vries, Philippe & Vertessen, Dieter (2008). Political Impression Management: How Metaphors, Sound Bites, Appearance Effectiveness, and Personality Traits Can Win Elections. Journal of Political Marketing 7(3/4): 217–238. doi: 10.1080/15377850802005083.
• de Melo, Celso M., Gratch, Jonathan, Carnevale, Peter & Read, Stephen (2012). Reverse appraisal: The importance of appraisals for the effect of emotion displays on people’s decision making in a social dilemma. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 34(34): 270–275.
• Debus, Marc (2017). An ‘Angela Merkel Effect’? The Impact of Gender on CDU/CSU Voting Intention between 1998 and 2013. German Politics 26(1): 35–48. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2016.1182501.
• Decker, Frank (2016). The “Alternative for Germany”: Factors Behind its Emergence and Profile of a New Right-wing Populist Party. German Politics and Society 34(2): 1–16. doi: 10.3167/gps.2016.340201.
• Dickson, Eric S. (2011). Economics versus Psychology Experiments: Stylization, Incentives, and Deception. In James N. Druckman, Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski & Arthur Lupia (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, pp. 58–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Dobson, Andrew (2014). Listening for Democracy: Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Druckman, James N. & Kam, Cindy D. (2011). Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the “Narrow Data Base”. In James N. Druckman, Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski & Arthur Lupia (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, pp. 41–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Druckman, James N. (2003). The Power of Television Images: The First Kennedy-Nixon Debate Revisited. The Journal of Politics 65(2): 559–571. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00015.
• Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H. & Lupia, Arthur (eds.) (2011). Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Du, Shichuan, Tao, Yong & Martinez, Aleix M. (2014). Compound facial expressions of emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(15): 1454–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322355111.
• Dumitrescu, Delia (2010). Know Me, Love Me, Fear Me: The Anatomy of Candidate Poster Designs in the 2007 French Legislative Elections. Political Communication 27(1): 20–43. doi: 10.1080/10584600903297117.
• Dumitrescu, Delia (2016). Nonverbal communication in politics: A review of research developments, 2005-2015. American Behavioral Scientist 60(14): 1656-1675. doi: 10.1177/0002764216678280.
• Dumitrescu, Delia, Gidengil, Elisabeth & Stolle, Dietlind (2015). Candidate Confidence and Electoral Appeal: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Nonverbal Confidence on Voter Evaluations. Political Science Research and Methods 3(1): 43–52. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2014.16.
• Durst, Uwe (2001). Why Germans don’t feel “anger”. In Jean Harkins & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Emotions in Crosslinguistic Perspective, pp. 115–148. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Eagly, Alice H. & Johannesen-Schmidt, Mary C. (2001). The Leadership Styles of Women and Men. Journal of Social Issues 57(4): 781–797. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00241.
• Ekman, Paul (1992). An Argument for Basic Emotion. Cognition and Emotion 6(3/4): 169–200. doi: 10.1080/02699939208411068.
• Ekman, Paul & Cordaro, Daniel (2011). What is Meant by Calling Emotions Basic. Emotion Review 3(4): 364–370. doi: 10.1177/1754073911410740.
• Ekman, Paul & Friesen, Wallace V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17(2): 124–129. doi: 10.1037/h0030377.
• Ekman, Paul & Friesen, Wallace V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
• Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V., Ellsworth, Phoebe, Goldstein, Arnold P. & Krasner, Leonard (1972). Emotion in the Human Face: Guidelines for Research and an Integration of Findings. Burlington: Elsevier Science.
• Elfenbein, Hillary A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion. Organizational Psychology Review 4(4): 326–362. doi: 10.1177/2041386614542889.
• Ellsworth, Phoebe C. (2013). Appraisal Theory: Old and New Questions. Emotion Review 5(2): 125–131. doi: 10.1177/1754073912463617.
• Epskamp, Sacha, Borsboom, Denny & Fried, Eiko I. (2018). Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper. Behavior Research Methods 50(1): 195–212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1.
• Falter, Jürgen W. (1977). Einmal mehr: Läßt sich das Konzept der Parteiidentifikation auf deutsche Verhältnisse übertragen? Theoretische, methodologische und empirische Probleme einer Validierung des Konstrukts „Parteiidentifikation“ für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 18(2/3): 476–500.
• Ferreira Da Silva, Frederico & Costa, Patrício (2019). Do we need warm leaders? Exploratory study of the role of voter evaluations of leaders’ traits on turnout in seven European countries. European Journal of Political Research 58(1): 117–140. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12273.
• Field, Andy (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
• Finn, Christopher & Glaser, Jack (2010). Voter affect and the 2008 US presidential election: Hope and race mattered. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 10(1): 262–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01206.x.
• Fiorina, Morris P. (1976). The Voting Decision: Instrumental and Expressive Aspects. The Journal of Politics 38(2): 390–413. doi: 10.2307/2129541.
• Fischbacher, Urs (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10(2): 171–178. doi: 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4.
• Fischer, Agneta H. & Manstead, Antony S. R. (2008). Social functions of emotion. In Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones & Lisa F. Barrett (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, pp. 456–468. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Fischer, Agneta H. & Roseman, Ira J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(1): 103–115. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103.
• Fischer, Agneta H. & Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2010). Where Have all the People Gone? A Plea for Including Social Interaction in Emotion Research. Emotion Review 2(3): 208–211. doi: 10.1177/1754073910361980.
• Fischer, Agneta H., Halperin, Eran, Canetti, Daphna & Jasini, Alba (2018). Why we hate. Emotion Review, 10(4): 309–320. doi: 10.1177/1754073917751229.
• Fischer, Agneta H., Pauw, Lisanne S. & Manstead, Antony S. (2019). Emotion Recognition as a Social Act: In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 7–24. Cham: Springer.
• Fiske, Susan T. & Taylor, Shelley E. (2017). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. 3rd edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
• Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., Glick, Peter & Xu, Jun (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6): 878–902. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878.
• Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C. & Glick, Peter (2007). Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(2): 77–83.
• Flyvbjerg, Bent (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363.
• Forgas, Joseph P. & Bower, Gordon H. (1987). Mood effects on person-perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(1): 53–60. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.53.
• Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (2015b). Internet-Strukturdaten: Repräsentative Umfrage - Jahreskumulation. Available online at: http://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Umfragen/Archiv__weitere_Umfragen/Internet-Strukturdaten/web_II_14.pdf (last accessed: 20 July 2019).
• Frank, Cornelia, Schoen, Harald & Faas, Thorsten (2015). Zur Einführung: Politische Psychologie als interdisziplinäre Forschungsperspektive. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. PVS Sonderheft 50: 10–43. doi: 10.5771/9783845254418-10.
• Frey, Siegfried (1999). Die Macht des Bildes: Der Einfluss der nonverbalen Kommunikation auf Kultur und Politik. Bern: H. Huber.
• Fridkin, Kim L. & Kenney, Patrick J. (2011). Variability in citizens’ reactions to different types of negative campaigns. American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 307–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00494.x.
• Fried, Eiko (2016, October 19): R tutorial: how to identify communities of items in networks [Blog Post]. Available online at: http://psych-networks.com/r-tutorial-identify-communities-items-networks/ (last accessed: 20 July 2019).
• Frijda, Nico H. (1987). Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cognition and Emotion 1(2): 115–143. doi: 10.1080/02699938708408043.
• Funk, Carolyn L. (1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior 18(1): 1–24. doi: 10.1007/BF01498658.
• Funk, Carolyn L. (1999). Bringing the candidate into models of candidate evaluation. The Journal of Politics 61(3): 700–720. doi: 10.2307/2647824.
• Gabriel, Oscar W. & Masch, Lena (2017). Displays of emotion and citizen support for Merkel and Gysi: How emotional contagion affects evaluations of leadership. Politics and the Life Sciences 36(2): 80–103. doi: 10.1017/pls.2017.15.
• Gabriel, Oscar W., Keil, Silke I. & Thaidigsmann, S. Isabell (2009). Kandidatenorientierungen und Wahlentscheid bei der Bundestagswahl 2005. In Oscar W. Gabriel, Bernhard Weßels & Jürgen W. Falter (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2005, pp. 267–303. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
• Gadarian, Shana K. & Van der Vort, Eric (2018). The gag reflex: Disgust rhetoric and gay rights in American politics. Political Behavior 40(2): 521–543.
• Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H. & Quirk, Paul J. (2007). The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined. Political Analysis 15(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpl008.
• Garrido, Luis E., Abad, Francisco J. & Ponsoda, Vicente (2011). Performance of Velicer’s Minimum Average Partial Factor Retention Method With Categorical Variables. Educational and Psychological Measurement 71(3): 551–570. doi: 10.1177/0013164410389489.
• Garzia, Diego (2013a). Changing Parties, Changing Partisans: The Personalization of Partisan Attachments in Western Europe. Political Psychology 34(1): 67–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00918.x.
• Garzia, Diego (2013b). The Rise of Party Leader Identification in Western Europe. Political Research Quarterly 66(3): 533–544. doi: 10.1177/1065912912463122.
• Garzia, Diego (2014). Personalization of politics and electoral change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Garzia, Diego (2017). Voter Evaluation of Candidates and Party Leaders. In Kai Arzheimer, Jocelyn Evans & Michael S. Lewis-Beck (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour, pp. 633–653. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
• Gerber, Alan S. & Green, Donald P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 94(3): 653–663. doi: 10.2307/2585837.
• Gerber, Alan S. & Green, Donald P. (2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. New York, NY: Norton.
• Gerber, Alan S., Gimpel, James G., Green, Donald P. & Shaw, Daron R. (2011). How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 105(1): 135–150. doi: 10.1017/S000305541000047X.
• Glaser, Jack & Salovey, Peter (1998). Affect in electoral politics. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2(3): 156–172. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_1.
• Glass, David P. (1985). Evaluating presidential candidates: Who focuses on their personal attributes? Public Opinion Quarterly 49(4): 517–534. doi: 10.1086/268948.
• Goffman, Erving (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Anchor.
• Goodwin, Matthew, Hix, Simon & Pickup, Mark (2020). For and against Brexit: A survey experiment of the impact of campaign effects on public attitudes toward EU membership. British Journal of Political Science: 481–495. doi: 10.1017/S0007123417000667.
• Gooty, Janaki, Connelly, Shane, Griffith, Jennifer A. & Gupta, Alka (2010). Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review. The Leadership Quarterly 21(6): 979–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.005.
• Gosnell, Harold F. (1926). An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting. The American Political Science Review 20(4): 896-874. doi: 10.2307/1945435.
• Grabe, Maria E. & Bucy, Erik P. (2009). Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gratch, Jonathan & de Melo, Celso M. (2019). Inferring Intentions from Emotion Expressions in Social Decision Making. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 141–160. Cham: Springer.
• Gratch, Jonathan & Marsella, Stacy (2014). Introduction: Toward an Information Processing Revolution in Social Emotions. In Jonathan Gratch & Stacy Marsella (eds.), Social Emotions in Nature and Artifact, pp. 1–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley & Schickler, Eric (2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CI: Yale University Press.
• Greenwald, Anthony G., McGhee, Debbie & Schwartz, Jordan L.K. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6): 1464–1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
• Greszki, Robert, Meyer, Marco & Schoen, Harald (2015). Exploring the Effects of Removing “Too Fast” Responses and Respondents from Web Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 79(2): 471–503. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfu058.
• Haider-Markel, Donald P. & Joslyn, Mark R. (2008). Beliefs about the Origins of Homosexuality and Support for Gay Rights: An Empirical Test of Attribution Theory. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 291–310. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn015.
• Haidt, Jonathan (2003). The Moral Emotions. In Richard J. Davidson, Klaus R. Scherer & H. Hill Goldsmith (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences, pp. 852–870. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Hainmueller, Jens & Hiscox, Michael J. (2010). Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. American Political Science Review 104(1): 61–84. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409990372.
• Hamelin, Nicolas, El Moujahid, Othmane, & Thaichon, Park (2017). Emotion and advertising effectiveness: A novel facial expression analysis approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 36: 103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.01.001.
• Hand, David J. (1994). Deconstructing Statistical Questions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 157(3): 317–356. doi: 10.2307/2983526.
• Hareli, Shlomo & Hess, Ursula (2010). What emotional reactions can tell us about the nature of others: An appraisal perspective on person perception. Cognition and Emotion 24(1): 128–140. doi: 10.1080/02699930802613828.
• Hareli, Shlomo & Hess, Ursula (2012). The social signal value of emotions. Cognition and Emotion 26(3): 385–389. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.665029.
• Hareli, Shlomo & Hess, Ursula (2019). The Reverse Engineering of Emotions–Observers of Others’ Emotions as Naïve Personality Psychologists. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 103–118. Cham: SpringerSpringer, Cham.
• Hareli, Shlomo & Rafaeli, Anat (2008). Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 28: 35–59. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.007.
• Hareli, Shlomo, Elkabetz, Simon & Hess, Ursula (2019). The Use of Emotions to Infer Norms and Standards. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 199–208. Cham: Springer.
• Hareli, Shlomo, Shomrat, Noga & Hess, Ursula (2009). Emotional versus neutral expressions and perceptions of social dominance and submissiveness. Emotion 9(3): 378–384. doi: 10.1037/a0015958.
• Harell, Allison, Soroka, Stuart & Iyengar, Shanto (2017). Locus of Control and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Political Psychology 38(2): 245–260. doi: 10.1111/pops.12338.
• Harkins, Jean & Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.) (2001). Emotions in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Hart, William, Ottati, Victor C. & Krumdick, Nathaniel D. (2011). Physical Attractiveness and Candidate Evaluation: A Model of Correction. Political Psychology 32(2): 181–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00812.x.
• Hatfield, Elaine, Cacioppo, John T. & Rapson, Richard L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. In Margaret S. Clark (ed.), Emotion and social behavior, pp. 151–177. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
• Hatfield, Elaine, Cacioppo, John T. & Rapson, Richard L. (1993). Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2(3): 96–100. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953.
• Hatfield, Elaine, Cacioppo, John T. & Rapson, Richard L. (1994). Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hayes, Danny (2005). Candidate qualities through a partisan lens: A theory of trait ownership. American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 908–923. doi: 10.2307/3647705.
• Hayes, Danny (2009). Has television personalized voting behavior? Political Behavior 31(2): 231–260. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9070-0.
• Heider, Fritz (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
• Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven J. & Norenzayan, Ara (2010). The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–-3): 61–83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
• Hess, Ursula (2014). Anger Is a Positive Emotion. In W. Gerrod Parrott (ed.), The positive side of negative emotions, pp. 55–75. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Hibbing, John R., Smith, Kevin B. & Alford, John R. (2013). Predisposed: Liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political differences. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Hill, Edward, Han, David, Dumouchel, Pierre, Dehak, Najim, Quatieri, Thomas, Moehs, Charles, Oscar-Berman, Marlene, Giordano, John, Simpatico, Thomas & Blum, Kenneth (2013). Long term Suboxone™ emotional reactivity as measured by automatic detection in speech. PLoS ONE 8(7): e69043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069043.
• Hochschild, Arlie R. (2012). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. 3rd edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Hoggett, Paul & Thompson, Simon (2012). Politics and the Emotions: The Affective Turn in Contemporary Political Studies. London: Continuum International Publishing.
• Holland, Paul W. (1986). Statistics and Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(396): 945–960. doi: 10.2307/2289064.
• Hooghe, Liesbet & Marks, Gary (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy 25(1): 109–135. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279.
• Horiuchi, Yusaku & Mayerson, Asher (2015). The Opportunity Cost of Conflict: Statistically Comparing Israel and Synthetic Israel. Political Science Research and Methods 3(3): 609–618. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2014.47.
• Horn, John L. (1965). A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis. Psychometrica 30(2): 179–185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447.
• Huber, Sascha (2014). What comes first, character traits or political assessments? An experimental study. In Marina C. Lobo & John Curtice (eds.), Personality Politics? The role of leader evaluations in democratic elections, pp. 38–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Huddy, Leonie & Terkildsen, Nayda (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 119–147. doi: 10.2307/2111526.
• Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley & Cassese, Erin (2007). On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger. In W. Russell Neuman, George E. Marcus. Ann N. Crigler & Michael MacKuen (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, 202–230. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Huddy, Leonie., Mason, Lilliana & Aarøe, Lene (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review 109(1): 1–17. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000604.
• Imbens, Guido W. & Rubin, Donald B. (2015). Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Isbell, Linda M., Ottati, Victor C. & Burns, Kathleen C. (2006). Affect and Politics: Effect on Judgment, Processing, and Information Seeking. In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling Politics: Emotions in Political Information Processing, pp. 57–86. New York, NY: Palgrave.
• Jack, Rachael E., Garrod, Oliver G.B. & Schyns, Philippe G. (2014). Dynamic Facial Expressions of Emotion Transmit an Evolving Hierarchy of Signals over Time. Current Biology 24(1): 187–192. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.064.
• Jäckle, Sebastian & Metz, Thomas (2016). Brille, Blazer oder Bart? Das Aussehen als Determinante des Wahlerfolgs von Bundestags- Direktkandidaten. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 57(2): 217–246. doi: 10.5771/0032-3470-2016-2-217.
• Jäckle, Sebastian & Metz, Thomas (2017). Beauty Contest Revisited: The Effects of Perceived Attractiveness, Competence, and Likability on the Electoral Success of German MPs. Politics & Policy 45(4): 495–534. doi: 10.1111/polp.12209.
• Jakobson, Roman (1960). Closing Statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, pp. 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Johns, Robert & Shephard, Mark (2011). Facing the Voters: The Potential Impact of Ballot Paper Photographs in British Elections. Political Studies 59(3): 636–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00874.x.
• Johnston, Christopher D., Lavine, Howard & Woodson, Benjamin (2015). Emotion and Political Judgment: Expectancy Violation and Affective Intelligence. Political Research Quarterly 68(3): 474–492. doi: 10.1177/1065912915593644.
• Jost, John T. (2017). Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology. Political Psychology 38(2): 167–208. doi: 10.1111/pops.12407.
• Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W. & Sulloway, Frank J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339–375. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.
• Kaase, Max (1994). Is there personalization in politics? Candidates and voting behavior in Germany. International Political Science Review 15(3): 211–230. doi: 10.1177/019251219401500301.
• Kahneman, Daniel (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. The American Psychologist 58(9): 697–720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697.
• Kahneman, Daniel (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Kalmoe, Nathan P. (2019). Mobilizing Voters with Aggressive Metaphors. Political Science Research and Methods 7(3): 411–429. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2017.36.
• Kapp, Julie M., Peters, Colleen & Oliver, Debra Parker (2013). Research recruitment using Facebook advertising: big potential, big challenges. Journal of Cancer Education 28(1): 134–137. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0443-z.
• Karvonen, Lauri (2010). The personalisation of politics: A study of parliamentary democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
• Kaufman, Bruce E. (1999). Emotional arousal as a source of bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 38(2): 135–144. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00002-5.
• Kelley, Harold H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist 28(2): 107–128. doi: 10.1037/h0034225.
• Kelly, Janice R. (2004). Mood and Emotion in Groups. In Marylinn B. Brewer & Miles Hewstone (eds.), Emotion and Motivation, pp. 95–112. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
• Keuschnigg, Marc & Wolbring, Tobias (eds.) (2015). Experimente in den Sozialwissenschaften. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
• Kinder, Donald R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In Richard R. Lau & David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, pp. 233–257. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D., Abelson, Robert P. & Fiske, Susan T. (1980). Presidential prototypes. Political Behavior 2(4): 315–337. doi: 10.1007/BF00990172.
• King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. & Verba, Sidney (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Klein, Markus & Rosar, Ulrich (2016). Problem-Peer und die (Über-)Mutter der Nation: Kanzlerkandidaten und Wahlentscheidung bei der Bundestagswahl 2013. In Harald Schoen & Bernhard Weßels (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2013, pp. 91–109. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Klofstad, Casey A. (2016). Candidate Voice Pitch Influences Election Outcomes. Political Psychology 37(5): 725–738. doi: 10.1111/pops.12280.
• Knutson, Brian (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 20(3): 165–182. doi: 10.1007/BF02281954.
• Koenker, Roger & d’Orey, Vasco (1987). Algorithm AS 229: Computing Regression Quantiles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 36(3): 383–393. doi: 10.2307/2347802.
• Koenker, Roger (2005). Quantile Regression. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Koppensteiner, Markus & Grammer, Karl (2010). Motion patterns in political speech and their influence on personality ratings. Journal of Research in Personality 44(3): 374–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.04.002.
• Koppensteiner, Markus (2013). Motion cues that make an impression: Predicting perceived personality by minimal motion information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(6): 1137–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.08.002.
• Kouloumpis, Efthymios, Wilson, Theresa & Moore, Johanna D. (2011). Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg! In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 538–541. AAAI Press.
• Kraus, Sidney (1996). Winners of the First 1960 Televised Presidential Debate Between Kennedy and Nixon. Journal of Communication 46(4): 78–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01507.x.
• Krohne, Heinz W., Egloff, Boris, Kohlmann, Carl-Walter & Tausch, Anja (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der "Positive and Negative Affect Schedule"(PANAS). Diagnostica 42(2): 139–156. doi: 10.1037/t49650-000.
• Krosnick, Jon A. & Alwin, Duane F. (1987). An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly 51(2): 201–219. doi: 10.1086/269029.
• Ksiazkiewicz, Aleksander, Vitriol, Joseph & Farhart, Christina (2018). Implicit Candidate-Trait Associations in Political Campaigns. Political Psychology 39(1): 177–195. doi: 10.1111/pops.12398.
• Kuklinski, James H., Cobb, Michael D. & Gilens, Martin (1997). Racial Attitudes and the “New South”. The Journal of Politics 59(2): 323–349. doi: 10.2307/2998167.
• Ladd, Jonathan M. & Lenz, Gabriel S. (2011). Does Anxiety Improve Voters’ Decision Making? Political Psychology 32(2): 347–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00805.x.
• Lalancette, Mireille, & Raynauld, Vincent (2019). The power of political image: Justin Trudeau, Instagram, and celebrity politics. American Behavioral Scientist 63(7): 888-924. doi: 10.1177/0002764217744838.
• Lau, Richard R. & Redlawsk, David P. (2001). Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 951–971. doi: 10.2307/2669334.
• Lau, Richard R. & Redlawsk, David P. (2016). The Effects of Advertising Tone on Information Processing and Vote Choice. In Alessandro Nai & Annemarie S. Walter (eds.), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters, pp. 247–264. Colchester: ECPR Press.
• Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee & Rovner, Ivy B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta‐analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics 69(4): 1176–1209. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x.
• Laustsen, Lasse & Bor, Alexander (2017). The relative weight of character traits in political candidate evaluations: Warmth is more important than competence, leadership and integrity. Electoral Studies 49: 96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.08.001.
• Laustsen, Lasse & Petersen, Michael B. (2017). Perceived conflict and leader dominance: Individual and contextual factors behind preferences for dominant leaders. Political Psychology 38(6): 1083–1101. doi: 10.1111/pops.12403.
• Lavine, Howard & Gschwend, Thomas (2007). Issues, party and character: The moderating role of ideological thinking on candidate evaluation. British Journal of Political Science 37(1): 139–163. doi: 10.1017/S0007123407000075.
• Lavine, Howard, Lodge, Milton, Polichak, James & Taber, Charles (2002). Explicating the Black Box Through Experimentation: Studies of Authoritarianism and Threat. Political Analysis 10(4): 343–360. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.4.343.
• Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard & Gaudet, Hazel (1969). The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign. 3rd edition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
• Lazarus, Richard S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist 39(2): 124–129. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.124.
• Lenz, Gabriel S. & Lawson, Chappell (2011). Looking the Part: Television Leads Less Informed Citizens to Vote Based on Candidates’ Appearance. American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 574–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00511.x.
• Levitt, Steven D. & List, John A. (2007). What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World? Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2): 153–174. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.2.153.
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (2006). Does Economics Still Matter? Econometrics and the Vote. The Journal of Politics 68(1): 208–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00381.x.
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William G., Norpoth, Helmut & Weisberg, Herbert F. (2008). The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
• Liesen, Laurette T. & Walsh, Mary B. (2012). The competing meanings of “biopolitics” in political science. Biological and postmodern approaches to politics. Politics and the Life Sciences 31(1-2): 2–15. doi: 10.2990/31_1-2_2.
• Lobo, Marina C. & Curtice, John (eds.) (2014). Personality Politics? The role of leader evaluations in democratic elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lodge, Milton & Taber, Charles S. (2013). The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R. & Brau, Shawn (1995). The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation. American Political Science Review 89(2): 309–326. doi: 10.2307/2082427.
• Lord, Frederic M. (1967). A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin 68(5): 304–305. doi: 10.1037/h0025105.
• Lupia, Arthur (2002). New Ideas in Experimental Political Science. Political Analysis 10(4): 319–324. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.4.319.
• Machatzke, Jörg (1997). Die Potsdamer Elitestudie: Positionsauswahl und Ausschöpfung. In Wilhelm P. Bürklin & Hilke Rebenstorf (eds.), Eliten in Deutschland: Rekrutierung und Integration, pp. 35–68. Wiesbaden: Springer.
• MacKuen, Michael, Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell & Keele, Luke (2007). The Third Way: The Theory of Affective Intelligence and American Democracy. In W. Russell Neuman, George E. Marcus, Ann N. Crigler & Michael MacKuen (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, pp. 124–151. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Manders, Erika (2012). Coining images of power: Patterns in the representation of Roman emperors on imperial coinage, A.D. 193–284. Leiden: Brill.
• Marcus, George E. (2000). Emotions in politics. Annual Review of Political Science 3(1): 221-250. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.221.
• Marcus, George E., MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer & Keele, Luke (2006). The Measure and Mismeasure of Emotion. In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling Politics: Emotions in Political Information Processing, pp. 31–46. New York, NY: Palgrave.
• Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell & MacKuen, Michael (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell & MacKuen, Michael B. (2017). Measuring Emotional Response: Comparing Alternative Approaches to Measurement. Political Science Research and Methods 5(4): 733–754. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.65.
• Marcus, George E., Valentino, Nicholas A., Vasilopoulos, Pavlos & Foucault, Martial (2019). Applying the Theory of Affective Intelligence to Support for Authoritarian Policies and Parties. Political Psychology 40: 109–139. doi: 10.1111/pops.12571.
• Marsh, Abigail A., Ambady, Nalini & Kleck, Robert E. (2005). The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach-and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion 5(1): 119–124. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.119.
• Masch, Lena & Gabriel, Oscar W. (2020). How Emotional Displays of Political Leaders Shape Citizen Attitudes: The Case of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. German Politics 29(2): 158–179. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2019.1657096.
• Mason, Lilliana (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Mason, Lilliana & Wronski, Julie (2018). One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychology 39: 257–277. doi: 10.1111/pops.12485.
• Masters, Roger D. (1991). Conclusion: Primate Politics and Political Theory. In Glendon Schubert & Roger D. Masters (eds.), Primate Politics, pp. 221–250. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Masters, Roger D. (1994). Differences in Responses of Blacks and Whites to American Leaders. Politics and the Life Sciences 13(2): 183–194. doi: 10.1017/S0730938400018360.
• Masters, Roger D. & Sullivan, Denis G. (1989a). Nonverbal Displays and Political Leadership in France and the United States. Political Behavior 11(2): 123–156. doi: 10.1007/BF00992491.
• Masters, Roger D. & Sullivan, Denis G. (1989b). Facial displays and political leadership in France. Behavioural Processes 19(1-3): 1–30. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(89)90028-4.
• Masters, Roger D., Frey, Siegfried & Bente, Gary (1991). Dominance & Attention: Images of Leaders in German, French, & American TV News. Polity 23(3): 373–394. doi: 10.2307/3235132.
• Masters, Roger D., Sullivan, Denis G., Lanzetta, John T., McHugo, Gregory J. & Englis, Basil G. (1986). The facial displays of leaders: Toward an ethology of human politics. Journal of Social and Biological Systems 9(4): 319–343. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1750(86)90190-9.
• Mattes, Kyle & Redlawsk, David P. (2015). The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
• Mattes, Kyle, Roseman, Ira J., Redlawsk, David P. & Katz, Steven (2017). Contempt and Anger in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. In Jennifer C. Lucas, Christopher J. Galdieri & Tauna S. Sisco (eds.), Conventional wisdom, parties, and broken barriers in the 2016 election, pp. 101–107. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
• Mattes, Kyle, Spezio, Michael, Kim, Hackjin, Todorov, Alexander, Adolphs, Ralph & Alvarez, R. Michael (2010). Predicting Election Outcomes from Positive and Negative Trait Assessments of Candidate Images. Political Psychology 31(1): 41–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00745.x.
• Mayer, Sabrina J. (2016). Die Parteiidentifikation: Eine Konstruktvalidierung neuer Maße auf Basis des Ansatzes sozialer Identität. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• McDermott, Monika L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 895–918. doi: 10.2307/449110.
• McDermott, Monika L., Schwartz, Douglas & Vallejo, Sebastian (2015). Talking the talk but not walking the walk: Public reactions to hypocrisy in political scandal. American Politics Research 43(6): 952–974. doi: 10.1177/1532673X15577830.
• McDermott, Rose (2002). Experimental Methodology in Political Science. Political Analysis 10(4): 325–342. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.4.325.
• McHugo, Gregory J., Lanzetta, John T., Sullivan, Denis G., Masters, Roger D. & Englis, Basil G. (1985). Emotional reactions to a political leader’s expressive displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(6): 1513–1529. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1513.
• McHugo, Gregory J., Lanzetta, John T. & Bush, Lauren K. (1991). The Effect of Attitudes on Emotional Reactions to Expressive Display of Political Leaders. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 15(1): 19–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00997765.
• McIntosh, Daniel N., Druckman, Daniel & Zajonc, Robert B. (1994). Socially induced affect. In Daniel Druckman & Robert A. Bjork (eds.), Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance, pp. 251–276. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
• Mehrabian, Albert (1980). Basic dimensions for a general psychological theory: Implications for personality, social, environmental, and developmental studies. Cambridge: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
• Mehrabian, Albert & Russell, James A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Meyrowitz, Joshua (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of the Electronic Media on Social Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Miller, Arthur H., Wattenberg, Martin P. & Malanchuk, Oksana (1986). Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates. American Political Science Review 80(2): 521–540. doi: 10.2307/1958272.
• Miron-Spektor, Ella & Rafaeli, Anat (2009). The effects of anger in the workplace: When, where, and why observing anger enhances or hinders performance. In Joseph J. Martocchio & Hui Liao (eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources: Management (Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Volume 28), pp. 153–178. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Mitchell, Dona-Gene (2014). Here today, gone tomorrow? Assessing how timing and repetition of scandal information affects candidate evaluations. Political Psychology 35(5): 679–701. doi: 10.1111/pops.12095.
• Mölders, Christina & van Quaquebeke, Niels (2017). Some like it hot: How voters’ attitude towards disrespect in politics affects their judgments of candidates. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 5(1): 58–81. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v5i1.633.
• Mölders, Christina, van Quaquebeke, Niels & Paladino, Maria P. (2017). Consequences of Politicians’ Disrespectful Communication Depend on Social Judgment Dimensions and Voters’ Moral Identity. Political Psychology 38(1): 119–135. doi: 10.1111/pops.12311.
• Moody, Eric J., McIntosh, Daniel N., Mann, Laura J. & Weisser, Kimberly R. (2007). More than mere mimicry? The influence of emotion on rapid facial reactions to faces. Emotion 7(2): 447–457. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.447.
• Morgan, Rick L. & Heise, David (1988). Structure of Emotions. Social Psychology Quarterly 51(1): 19–31. doi: 10.2307/2786981.
• Morton, Rebecca B. & Williams, Kenneth C. (2010). Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Mudde, Cas & Kaltwasser, Cristobal R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Mullinix, Kevin J., Leeper, Thomas J., Druckman, James N. & Freese, Jeremy (2015). The Generalizability of Survey Experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 109–138. doi: 10.1017/XPS.2015.19.
• Murray, Gregg R. (2014). Evolutionary preferences for physical formidability in leaders. Politics and the Life Sciences 33(1): 33–53. doi: 10.2990/33_1_33.
• Mutz, Diana C. (2007). Effects of “In-Your-Face” Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition. American Political Science Review 101(4): 621–635. doi: 10.1017/S000305540707044X.
• Mutz, Diana C. (2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Mutz, Diana C. (2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Mutz, Diana C. & Reeves, Byron (2005). The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust. American Political Science Review 99(1): 1–15. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051452.
• Nai, Alessandro & Maier, Jürgen (2018). Perceived personality and campaign style of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Personality and Individual Differences 121: 80–83. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.020.
• Nai, Alessandro & Walter, Annemarie S. (eds.) (2016). New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press.
• Ohr, Dieter & Oscarsson, Henrik (2011). Leader Traits, Leader Image and Vote Choice. In Kees Aarts, André Blais & Hermann Schmitt (eds.), Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, pp. 187–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ohr, Dieter & Quandt, Markus (2012). Parteiidentifikation in Deutschland: Eine empirische Fundierung des Konzepts auf Basis der Theorie Sozialer Identität. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. PVS Sonderheft 45: 182–207. doi: 10.5771/9783845262178_186.
• Ohr, Dieter, Klein, Markus & Rosar, Ulrich (2013). Bewertungen der Kanzlerkandidaten und Wahlentscheidung bei der Bundestagswahl 2009. In Bernhard Weßels, Harald Schoen & Oscar W. Gabriel (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2009, pp. 206–230. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Ottati, Victor C., Terkildsen, Nayda & Hubbard, Clark (1997). Happy Faces Elicit Heuristic Processing in a Televised Impression Formation Task: A Cognitive Tuning Approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(11): 1144–1156. doi: 10.1177/01461672972311003.
• Pancer, S. Mark, Brown, Steven D. & Barr, Cathy W. (1999). Forming Impressions of Political Leaders: A Cross‐National Comparison. Political Psychology 20(2): 345–368. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00148.
• Parkinson, Brian, Fischer, Agneta H. & Manstead, Antony S.R. (2005). Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
• Parrott, W.Gerrod (2004). The Nature of Emotion. In Marilynn B. Brewer & Miles Hewstone (eds.), Emotion and Motivation, pp. 5–20. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
• Parrott, W. Gerrod (2014). Feeling, function, and the place of negative emotions in a happy life. In W. Gerrod Parrott (ed.), The Positive Side of Negative Emotions, pp. 273–-296. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Parrott, W. Gerrod (2019). Emotions as Signals of Moral Character. In Ursula Hess & Shlomo Hareli (eds.), The Social Nature of Emotion Expression, pp. 161-177. Cham: Springer
• Parzen, Michael I., Wei, Lee-Jen & Ying, Zhiliang (1994). A resampling method based on pivotal estimating functions. Biometrika 81(2): 341–350. doi: 10.2307/2336964.
• Patil, Vivek H., Singh, Surendra N., Mishra, Sanjay & Donavan, D. Todd (2008). Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: Abandon the ‘eigenvalue greater than one’ criterion. Journal of Business Research 61(2): 162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.008.
• Petersen, Michael B. (2010). Distinct Emotions, Distinct Domains: Anger, Anxiety and Perceptions of Intentionality. The Journal of Politics 72(2): 357–365. doi: 10.1017/S002238160999079X.
• Peterson, Johnathan C., Jacobs, Carly, Hibbing, John, & Smith, Kevin (2018). In your face: Emotional expressivity as a predictor of ideology. Politics and the Life Sciences 37(1): 53–67. doi: 10.1017/pls.2017.13.
• Peterson, Steven A. & Maiden, Robert (1993). Personality and Politics among Older Americans: A Rural Case Study. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development 36(2): 157–169. doi: 10.2190/F01D-XTXD-5TXL-V4KQ.
• Peterson, Steven A. & Somit, Albert (eds.) (2017). Handbook of Biology and Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Pietraszewski, David (2016). Priming race: Does the mind inhibit categorization by race at encoding or recall? Social Psychological and Personality Science 7(1): 85–91. doi: 10.1177/1948550615602934.
• Plutchik, Robert (2001). The Nature of Emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientists 89(4): 344–350.
• Poguntke, Thomas (2005). A Presidentializing Party State? The Federal Republic of Germany. In Thomas Poguntke & Paul Webb (eds.), The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, pp. 63–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Popkin, Samuel L. (1995). Information shortcuts and the reasoning voter. In Bernand Grofman (ed.), Information, participation, and choice: an economic theory of democracy in perspective, pp. 17–35. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
• Rahn, Wendy M. (1993). The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 472–496. doi: 10.2307/2111381.
• Rahn, Wendy M., Aldrich, John H., Borgida, Eugene & Sullivan, John L. (1990). A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal. In John A. Ferejohn & James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes, pp. 136–159. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
• Ramiro, Luis & Gomez, Raul (2017). Radical-Left Populism during the Great Recession: Podemos and Its Competition with the Established Radical Left. Political Studies 65(1): 108–126. doi: 10.1177/0032321716647400.
• Rammstedt, Beatrice, Kemper, Christoph J., Klein, Mira C., Beierlein, Constanze & Kovaleva, Anastassiya (2013). Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der fünf Dimensionen der Persönlichkeit: Big-Five-Inventory-10 (BFI-10). Methoden, Daten, Analysen 7(2): 233–249. doi: 10.12758/mda.2013.0.
• Ramo, Danielle E. & Prochaska, Judith J. (2012). Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. Journal of Medical Internet Research 14(1): e28. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1878.
• Redlawsk, David P. & Lau, Richard R. (2013). Behavioral Decision-Making. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 130–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Redlawsk, David P. & Pierce, Douglas (2017). Emotions and Voting. In Kai Arzheimer, Jocelyn Evans & Michael S. Lewis-Beck (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour, pp. 406–432. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
• Redlawsk, David P., Civettini, Andrew J. & Lau, Richard R. (2007). Affective Intelligence and Voting: Information Processing and Learning in a Campaign. In W. Russell Neuman, George E. Marcus, Ann N. Crigler & Michael MacKuen (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, pp. 152–179. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Redlawsk, David P., Roseman, Ira J., Mattes, Kyle & Katz, Steven (2016). Losers, Liars, and Low-Energy Individuals: Examining Contempt and Anger as Factors in Candidate Evaluation. Paper presented at the 112th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia, PA, September 1-4.
• Redlawsk, David P., Roseman, Ira J., Mattes, Kyle & Katz, Steven (2018). Donald Trump, contempt, and the 2016 GOP Iowa Caucuses. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28(2): 173–189. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2018.1441848.
• Reinemann, Carsten, Maurer, Marcus, Zerback, Thomas & Jandura, Olaf (2013). Die Spätentscheider: Medieneinflüsse auf kurzfristige Wahlentscheidungen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Renner, Anna-Maria (2019). Should Female Politicians Avoid Appearing Emotional? – Gender-Specific Effects of Politicians’ Emotions on the Attribution of Competence and Warmth. Politische Psychologie 7(1): 112–132.
• Renner, Anna-Maria & Masch, Lena (2019). Emotional woman – rational man? Gender stereotypical emotional expressivity of German politicians in news broadcasts. Communications 44(1): 81–103. doi: 10.1515/commun-2017-0048.
• Rico, Guillem, Guinjoan, Marc & Anduiza, Eva (2017). The Emotional Underpinnings of Populism: How Anger and Fear Affect Populist Attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review 23(4): 444–461. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12261.
• Ridout, Travis N. & Searles, Kathleen (2011). It’s My Campaign I’ll Cry If I Want To: How and When Campaigns Use Emotional Appeals. Political Psychology 32(3): 439–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00819.x.
• Rosar, Ulrich, Klein, Markus & Beckers, Tilo (2008). The frog pond beauty contest: Physical attractiveness and electoral success of the constituency candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia state election of 2005. European Journal of Political Research 47(1): 64-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00720.x.
• Roseman, Ira J. (2001). A Model of Appraisal in the Emotion System: Integrating Theory, Research, and Applications. In Klaus R. Scherer, Angela Schorr & Tom Johnstone (eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research, pp. 68–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Roseman, Ira J., Mattes, Kyle, Redlawsk, David P. & Katz, Steven (2019). Reprehensible, Laughable: The Role of Contempt in Negative Campaigning. American Politics Research: 1-34 [Online First]. doi: 10.1177/1532673X19857968.
• Rosenfeld, Bryn, Imai, Kosuke & Shapiro, Jacob N. (2016). An empirical validation study of popular survey methodologies for sensitive questions. American Journal of Political Science 60(3): 783–802. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12205.
• Roßmann, Joss (2017). Satisficing in Befragungen: Theorie, Messung und Erklärung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Roth, Dieter & Wüst, Andreas M. (2007). Emanzipiert und ungeliebt: Nicht-, Wechsel- und Protestwähler in Deutschland. In Werner J. Patzelt, Martin Sebaldt & Uwe Kranenpohl (eds.), Res publica semper reformanda. Wissenschaft und politische Bildung im Dienste des Gemeinwohls: Wissenschaft und politische Bildung im Dienste des Gemeinwohls. Festschrift für Heinrich Oberreuter zum 65. Geburtstag, pp. 390–412. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Rubin, Allen & Babbie, Earl R. (2008). Research Methods for Social Work. 6th edition. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
• Runge, Thomas E., Frey, Dieter, Gollwitzer, Peter M., Helmreich, Robert L. & Spence, Janet T. (1981). Masculine (instrumental) and feminine (expressive) traits: A comparison between students in the United States and West Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 12(2): 142–162. doi: 10.1177/0022022181122002.
• Russell, James A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(6): 1161–1178. doi: 10.1037/h0077714.
• Russell, James A. & Barrett, Lisa F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(5): 805–819. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.5.805.
• Ryan, Timothy J. (2012). What Makes Us Click? Demonstrating Incentives for Angry Discourse with Digital-Age Field Experiments. The Journal of Politics 74(4): 1138–1152. doi: 10.1017/S0022381612000540.
• Saad, Lydia (2012). Obama Ahead in 10-Point Favorability Measure, 62% to 55%: Trends suggest this is not a perfect predictor of victory in the election. Available online at: http://news.gallup.com/poll/158465/obama-ahead-point-favorability-measure.aspx (last accessed: 20 July 2019).
• Sakaluk, John K. & Short, Stephen D. (2017). A Methodological Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Sexuality Research: Used Practices, Best Practices, and Data Analysis Resources. The Journal of Sex Research 54(1): 1–9. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1137538.
• Salmela, Mikko, & von Scheve, Christian (2018). Emotional dynamics of right-and left-wing political populism. Humanity & Society 42(4): 434–-454. doi: 10.1177/0160597618802521.
• Scherer, Klaus R. (1997). Profiles of Emotion-antecedent Appraisal: Testing Theoretical Predictions across Cultures. Cognition and Emotion 11(2): 113–150. doi: 10.1080/026999397379962.
• Scherer, Klaus R. (2003). Introduction: Cognitive Components of Emotion. In Richard J. Davidson, Klaus R. Scherer & H. Hill Goldsmith (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences, pp. 563–571. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Scherer, Klaus R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information 44(4): 695–729. doi: 10.1177/0539018405058216.
• Schmidt-Atzert, Lothar (2008). Klassifikation von Emotionen. In Wilhelm Janke, Martin Schmidt-Daffy & Günter Debus (eds.), Experimentelle Emotionspsychologie: Methodische Ansätze - Probleme - Ergebnisse, pp. 179–193. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
• Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Weßels, Bernhard & Wolf, Christof (2014). Fazit und Ausblick: Langweile und Extreme, Fragmentierung und Konzentration. In Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, Hans Rattinger, Sigrid Roßteutscher, Bernhard Weßels & Christof Wolf (eds.), Zwischen Fragmentierung und Konzentration: Die Bundestagswahl 2013, pp. 355–364. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
• Schoen, Harald (2010). Die Wirtschaftskrise, Angst und politische Urteilsbildung: Eine Analyse zum Affective-Intelligence-Modell am Beispiel der Bundestagswahl 2009. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 39(2): 205–222.
• Schoen, Harald & Schumann, Siegfried (2007). Personality traits, partisan attitudes, and voting behavior: Evidence from Germany. Political Psychology 28(4): 471–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00582.x.
• Schoen, Harald & Steinbrecher, Markus (2013). Beyond total effects: Exploring the interplay of personality and attitudes in affecting turnout in the 2009 German federal election. Political Psychology 34(6): 939–940. doi: 10.1111/pops.12168.
• Schoen, Harald & Weßels, Bernhard (2016). Die Bundestagswahl 2013 – eine Zäsur im Wahlverhalten und Parteiensystem? In Harald Schoen & Bernhard Weßels (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2013, pp. 3–20. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Schreiber, Darren, Fonzo, Greg, Simmons, Alan N., Dawes, Christopher T., Flagan, Taru, Fowler, James H. & Paulus, Martin P. (2013). Red brain, blue brain: evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans. PloS one 8(2): e52970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052970.
• Schubert, Glendon & Masters, Roger D. (eds.) (1991). Primate Politics. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Schubert, James N. (1991). Human Vocalizations in Agonistic Political Encounters. In Glendon Schubert & Roger D. Masters (eds.), Primate Politics, pp. 207–220. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Schumann, Siegfried (2014). Persönlichkeit und Wahlverhalten. In Jürgen W. Falter & Harald Schoen (eds.), Handbuch Wahlforschung, pp. 591–624. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Searles, Kathleen & Mattes, Kyle (2015). It’s a Mad, Mad World: Using Emotion Inductions in a Survey. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 172–182. doi: 10.1017/XPS.2015.5.
• Seneca (1928). Moral Essays, Volume I: De Providentia. De Constantia. De Ira. De Clementia. Translated by John W. Basore. Loeb Classical Library 214. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Settle, Jaime E., Dawes, Christopher T., Loewen, Peter John & Panagopoulos, Costas (2017). Negative Affectivity, Political Contention, and Turnout: A Genopolitics Field Experiment. Political Psychology 38(6): 1065–1082. doi: 10.1111/pops.12379.
• Shah, Dhavan V., Hanna, Alex, Bucy, Erik P., Wells, Chris & Quevedo, Vidal (2015). The Power of Television Images in a Social Media Age: Linking Biobehavioral and Computational Approaches via the Second Screen. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659(1): 225–245. doi: 10.1177/0002716215569220.
• Shannon, Claude E. & Weaver, Warren (1998). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
• Shaver, Phillip, Schwartz, Judith, Kirson, Donald & O'Connor, Cary (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(6): 1061–1086. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061.
• Shrout, Patrick E. & Rodgers, Joseph L. (2018). Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis. Annual Review of Psychology 69: 487–510. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845.
• Siegert, Ingo, Böck, Ronald, Vlasenko, Bogdan, Philippou-Hübner, David & Wendemuth, Andreas (2011). Appropriate emotional labelling of non-acted speech using basic emotions, geneva emotion wheel and self assessment manikins. Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2011 IEEE International Conference: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICME.2011.6011929.
• Sinaceur, Marwan, Van Kleef, Gerben A., Neale, Margaret A., Adam, Hajo & Haag, Christophe (2011). Hot or cold: Is communicating anger or threats more effective in negotiation? The Journal of Applied Psychology 96(5): 1018–1032. doi: 10.1037/a0023896.
• Small, Deborah A. & Lerner, Jennifer S. (2008). Emotional Policy: Personal Sadness and Anger Shape Judgments about a Welfare Case. Political Psychology 29(2): 149–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00621.x.
• Smith, Craig A. & Lazarus, Richard S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition & Emotion 7(3-4): 233–269. doi: 10.1080/02699939308409189.
• Smith, Kevin B., Oxley, Douglas, Hibbing, Matthew V., Alford, John R. & Hibbing, John R. (2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PloS one 6(10): e25552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025552.
• Sniderman, Paul M., Hagen, Michael G., Tetlock, Philip E. & Brady, Henry E. (1986). Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics. British Journal of Political Science 16(04): 405–430. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400004506.
• Sparks, Holloway (2015). Mama Grizzlies and Guardians of the Republic: The Democratic and Intersectional Politics of Anger in the Tea Party Movement. New Political Science 37(1): 25–47. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2014.945252.
• Spector, Paul E. (1981). Research designs. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
• Spezio, Michael L., Rangel, Antonio, Alvarez, Ramon M., O’Doherty, John P., Mattes, Kyle, Todorov, Alexander, Kim, Hackjin & Adolphs, Ralph (2008). A neural basis for the effect of candidate appearance on election outcomes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 3(4): 344–352. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn040.
• Statistisches Bundesamt (2015). Bildungsstand: Bevölkerung nach Bildungsabschluss in Deutschland. Available online at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/BildungForschungKultur/Bildungsstand/Tabellen/Bildungsabschluss.html (last accessed: 18 February 2018).
• Stavrakakis, Yannis & Katsambekis, Giorgos (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies 19(2): 119–142. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2014.909266.
• Steenbergen, Marco R. & Ellis, Christopher (2006). Fear and Loathing in American Elections: Context, Traits, and Negative Candidate Effect. In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling Politics: Emotions in Political Information Processing, pp. 109–133. New York, NY: Palgrave.
• Stewart, Patrick A. (2011). The influence of self- and other-deprecatory humor on presidential candidate evaluation during the 2008 US election. Social Science Information 50(2): 201–222. doi: 10.1177/0539018410396616.
• Stewart, Patrick A. & Ford Dowe, Pearl K. (2013). Interpreting President Barack Obama’s Facial Displays of Emotion: Revisiting the Dartmouth Group. Political Psychology 34(3): 369–385. doi: 10.1111/pops.12004.
• Stewart, Patrick A., Bucy, Erik P. & Mehu, Marc (2015). Strengthening bonds and connecting with followers. Politics and the Life Sciences 34(1): 73–92. doi: 10.1017/pls.2015.5.
• Stewart, Patrick A., Salter, Frank K. & Mehu, Marc (2009b). Taking leaders at face value: Ethology and the analysis of televised leader displays. Politics and the Life Sciences 28(1): 48–74. doi: 10.2990/28_1_48.
• Stewart, Patrick A., Waller, Bridget M. & Schubert, James N. (2009a). Presidential speechmaking style: Emotional response to micro-expressions of facial affect. Motivation and Emotion 33(2): 125–135. doi: 10.1007/s11031-009-9129-1.
• Stier, Sebastian, Bleier, Arnim, Lietz, Haiko & Strohmaier, Markus (2018). Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication 35(1): 50-74. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/58u4c.
• Stroud, Laura R., Glaser, Jack & Salovey, Peter (2005). The Effects of Partisanship and Candidate Emotionality on Voter Preference. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 25(1): 25–44. doi: 10.2190/22PC-5PK7-5KU0-DNCQ.
• Sullivan, Denis G. (1996). Emotional Responses to the Nonverbal Behavior of French and American Political Leaders. Political Behavior 18(3): 311–325. doi: 10.1007/BF01498604.
• Sullivan, Denis G. & Masters, Roger D. (1988). “Happy Warriors”: Leaders’ Facial Display, Viewers Emotions, and Political Support. American Journal of Political Science 32(2): 345–368. doi: 10.2307/2111127.
• Sullivan, Denis G., Masters, Roger D., Lanzetta, John T., McHugo, Gregory J., Englis, Basil G. & Plate, Elise F. (1991). Facial Displays and Political Leadership: Some Experimental Findings. In Glendon Schubert & Roger D. Masters (eds.), Primate Politics, pp. 188–206. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Sullivan, John L., Aldrich, John H., Borgida, Eugene & Rahn, Wendy M. (1990). Candidate Appraisal and Human Nature: Man and Superman in the 1984 Election. Political Psychology 11(3): 459–484. doi: 10.2307/3791660.
• Tavris, Carol (1989). Anger: The misunderstood emotion. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
• Tenscher, Jens (2013). Ein Hauch von Wahlkampf. In Bernhard Weßels, Harald Schoen & Oscar W. Gabriel (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2009, pp. 63–78. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Tiedens, Larissa Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(1): 86–94. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.80.1.86.
• Tigue, Cara C., Borak, Diana J., O’Connor, Jillian J.M., Schandl, Charles & Feinberg, David R. (2012). Voice pitch influences voting behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(3): 210–216. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.09.004.
• Tilley, James, Neundorf, Anja & Hobolt, Sara B. (2018). When the Pound in People’s Pocket Matters: How Changes to Personal Financial Circumstances Affect Party Choice. The Journal of Politics 80(2): 555–569. doi: 10.1086/694549.
• Todorov, Alexander, Mandisodza, Anesu N., Goren, Amir & Hall, Crystal C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science 308(5728): 1623–1626. doi: 10.1126/science.1110589.
• Todorov, Alexander, Olivola, Christopher Y., Dotsch, Ron & Mende-Siedlecki, Peter (2015). Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology 66: 519–545. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831.
• Trivers, Robert L. (1971). The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology 46(1): 35–57. doi: 10.1086/406755.
• Turner, Nigel E. (1998). The Effect of Common Variance and Structure Pattern on Random Data Eigenvalues: Implications for the Accuracy of Parallel Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 58(4): 541–568. doi: 10.1177/0013164498058004001.
• Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157): 1124–1131.
• Ulbig, Stacy G. & Funk, Carolyn L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior 21(3): 265–282. doi: 10.1023/A:1022087617514.
• Valentino, Nicholas A. & Neuner, Fabian G. (2017). Why the Sky Didn’t Fall: Mobilizing Anger in Reaction to Voter ID Laws. Political Psychology 38(2): 331–350. doi: 10.1111/pops.12332.
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Banks, Antoine J., Hutchings, Vincent L. & Davis, Anne K. (2009). Selective Exposure in the Internet Age: The Interaction between Anxiety and Information Utility. Political Psychology 30(4): 591–613. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00716.x.
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Brader, Ted, Groenendyk, Eric W., Gregorowicz, Krysha & Hutchings, Vincent L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics 73(1): 156–170. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000939.
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., Banks, Antoine J. & Davis, Anne K. (2008). Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning via the Internet. Political Psychology 29(2): 247–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x.
• Van Borkulo, Claudia D., Borsboom, Denny, Epskamp, Sacha, Blanken, Tessa F., Boschloo, Lynn, Schoevers, Robert A. & Waldorp, Lourens J. (2014). A New Method for Constructing Networks from Binary Data. Scientific Reports 4(5918): 1–10. doi: 10.1038/srep05918.
• Van Borkulo, Claudia D., Boschloo, Lynn, Kossakowski, Jolanda J., Tio, Pia, Schoevers, Robert A., Borsboom, D. & Waldorp, Lourens J. (2017). Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. Working Paper. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29455.38569.
• Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2009). How Emotions Regulate Social Life: The Emotions as Social Information (EASI) Model. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18(3): 184–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x.
• Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2010). The Emerging View of Emotion as Social Information. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4(5): 331–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00262.x.
• Van Kleef, Gerben A. (2016). The Interpersonal Dynamics of Emotion: Toward an Integrative Theory of Emotions as Social Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Van Troost, Dunya, Klandermans, Bert & Van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien (2018). Friends in High Places: Anger and Frustration among Protesters When Their Political Allies Fail Them. Humanity & Society 42(4): 455–479. doi: 10.1177/0160597618802537.
• Van Zomeren, Martijn, Postmes, Tom & Spears, Russell (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin 134(4): 504–535. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504.
• Van Zomeren, Martijn, Spears, Russell, Fischer, Agneta H. & Leach, Colin W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(5): 649–664. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649.
• Van’t Riet, Jonathan, Schaap, Gabi, Kleemans, Mariska, Veling, Harm & Lecheler, Sophie (2019). On different sides: Investigating the persuasive effects of anger expression in political news messages. Political Psychology 40(4): 837–857. doi: 10.1111/pops.12554.
• Vasilopoulos, Pavlos, Marcus, George E., Valentino, Nicholas & Foucault, Martial (2019). Anger Mediates the Effects of Fear on Support for the Far Right—A Rejoinder. Political Psychology 40(4): 713–717. doi: 10.1111/pops.12598.
• Vasilopoulou, Sofia & Wagner, Markus (2017). Fear, anger and enthusiasm about the European Union: Effects of emotional reactions on public preferences towards European integration. European Union Politics 18(3): 382–405. doi: 10.1177/1465116517698048.
• Veneti, Anastasia, Jackson, Daniel & Lilleker, Darren G. (eds.) (2019). Visual Political Communication. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Vetter, Angelika & Brettschneider, Frank (1998).“Idealmaße”“ für Kanzlerkandidaten. ZUMA Nachrichten 22(43): 90–115.
• Vetter, Angelika & Gabriel, Oscar W. (1998). Candidate Evaluations and Party Choice in Germany, 1972-94: Do Candidates Matter? In Christopher J. Anderson & Carsten Zelle (eds.), Stability and Change in German Elections: How Electorates Merge, Converge, or Collide, pp. 71–98. Westport, CT: Praeger.
• Vorländer, Hans, Herold, Maik & Schäller, Steven (2018). PEGIDA as Part of Right-Wing Populism in Germany and Europe. In Hans Vorländer, Maik Herold & Steven Schäller (eds.), PEGIDA and New Right-Wing Populism in Germany: New Perspectives in German Political Studies, pp. 195–203. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Wagner, Markus (2014). Fear and Anger in Great Britain: Blame Assignment and Emotional Reactions to the Financial Crisis. Political Behavior 36(3): 683–703. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9241-5.
• Wallander, Lisa (2009). 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review. Social Science Research 38(3): 505–520. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.03.004.
• Walter, Annemarie S. & Nai, Alessandro (2016). Explaining the Use of Attack Behaviour in the Electoral Battlefield: A Literature Overview. In Alessandro Nai & Annemarie S. Walter (eds.), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters, pp. 97–114. Colchester: ECPR Press.
• Warne, Russell T. & Larsen, Ross (2014). Evaluating a proposed modification of the Guttman rule for determining the number of factors in an exploratory factor analysis. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling 50(1): 104–123.
• Watson, David, Clark, Lee A. & Tellegen, Auke (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(6): 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
• Wattenberg, Martin P. (1991). The rise of candidate-centered politics: Presidential elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Webster, Steven W. (2018). Anger and declining trust in government in the American electorate. Political Behavior 40(4): 933–964. doi: 10.1007/s11109-017-9431-7.
• Weiner, Bernard (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research 42(2): 203–2015. doi: 10.3102/00346543042002203.
• Weiner, Bernard (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review 92(4): 548–573. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548.
• Weiner, Bernard (1986). An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. New York, NY: Springer.
• West, Emily A. (2017). Descriptive Representation and Political Efficacy: Evidence from Obama and Clinton. The Journal of Politics 79(1): 351–355. doi: 10.1086/688888.
• Wierzbicka, Anna & Harkins, Jean (2001). Introduction. In Jean Harkins & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Emotions in Crosslinguistic Perspective, pp. 1–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Winter, David G. (2013). Personality Profiles of Political Elites. In Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears & James S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 423–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Wood, Adrienne, Rychlowska, Magdalena, Korb, Sebastian & Niedenthal, Paula (2016). Fashioning the Face: Sensorimotor Simulation Contributes to Facial Expression Recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20(3): 227–240. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.010.
• Wright, Daniel B. (2006). Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t test and ANCOVA produce different results. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 76(3): 663–675. doi: 10.1348/000709905X52210.
• Yoon, Kwang-Il (2015). Political Culture and Attribution of Responsibility. Journal of International and Area Studies 22(2): 39–65.
• Zajonc, Robert B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9(2, Pt. 2): 1–27. doi: 10.1037/h0025848.
• Zajonc, Robert B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist 39(2): 117–123. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.117.
• Zaller, John R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Zimmermann, Hubert (2014). A Grand Coalition for the Euro: The Second Merkel Cabinet, the Euro Crisis and the Elections of 2013. German Politics 23(4): 322–336. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2014.953069.
• Zwick, William R. & Velicer, Wayne F. (1982). Factors Influencing Four Rules for Determining the Number of Components to Retain. Multivariate Behavioral Research 17(2): 253–269. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1702_5.
• Datasets & Questionnaires
• American National Election Studies (2010). Time Series Cumulative Data File. The American National Election Studies. Available online at: www.electionstudies.org (last accessed: 02 February 2018).
• Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2001a). Politbarometer East 2000 (Cumulated Data Set). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3426 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3426.
• Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2001b). Politbarometer West 2000 (Cumulated Data Set). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3425 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3425.
• Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2002a). Politbarometer Eastern Germany 2001 (Accumulated Dataset). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3555 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3555.
• Berger, Manfred, Jung, Matthias & Roth, Dieter (2002b). Politbarometer Western Germany 2001 (Accumulated Dataset). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3554 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.3554.
• Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (2015a). Politbarometer 01/2000 – 06/2015. Available online at: http://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Umfragen/Politbarometer/Langzeitentwicklung_Themen_im_Ueberblick/Politik_II/8_Sympathiewerte_2.xlsx (last accessed: 12 June 2015).
• Forschungsgruppe Wahlen (2017): Politbarometer-Pressemitteilungen 2002-2017. Archiv. Available online at: http://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Umfragen/Politbarometer/Archiv/ (last accessed: 02 February 2018).
• GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (2015). ALLBUS/GGSS 2014 (Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften/German General Social Survey 2014). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5240 Data file Version 2.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12288.
• Maier, Jürgen & Gabriel, Oscar W. (2015). Codebuch II zur Medieninhaltsanalyse im Projekt „Die Bedeutung emotionaler Botschaften für die politische Urteilsbildung“: Ebene Einstellung. Universität Koblenz-Landau.
• Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Bieber, Ina, Bytzek, Evelyn & Scherer, Philipp (2011). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T1 (GLES 2009). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5334 Data file Version 3.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.10757.
• Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2014). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T18 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5351 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12033.
• Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Bieber, Ina, Bytzek, Evelyn & Scherer, Philipp (2015a). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T11 (GLES 2009). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5344 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12224.
• Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Bieber, Ina, Bytzek, Evelyn & Scherer, Philipp (2015b). Langfrist-Online-Tracking, T15 (GLES 2009). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5348 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12228.
• Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Henckel, Simon, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2015c). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T25 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5725 Data file Version 2.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12280.
• Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Schäfer, Anne & Schmidt, Sebastian (2015d). Campaign Media Content Analysis: TV (GLES 2013). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5705 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12173.
• Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Wagner, Aiko, Giebler, Heiko, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2017). Vor- und Nachwahl-Querschnitt (Kumulation) (GLES 2013). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5702 Data file Version 3.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12810.
• Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Henckel, Simon, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2016a). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T29 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5729 Data file Version 1.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12522.
• Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof & Henckel, Simon (2016b). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T33 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5733 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12675.
• Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Wolf, Christof, Dietz, Melanie, Bieber, Ina & Scherer, Philipp (2017). Langfrist-Online-Tracking T37 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6817 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12917.
• Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Bieber, Ina, Stövsand, Lars-Christopher, Dietz, Melanie & Scherer, Philipp (2018): Pre-election Cross Section (GLES 2017). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6800 Data file Version 3.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.12990.
• Software & Software Packages
• Arnold, Jeffrey B., Daroczi, Gergely, Werth, Bo & Weitzner, Brian (2017). Package ‘ggthemes’: Extra Themes, Scales and Geoms for ‘ggplot2’. R-package version 3.4.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggthemes/ggthemes.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Auguie, Baptiste & Antonov, Anton (2017). Package ‘gridExtra’: Miscellaneous Functions for ‘Grid’ Graphics. R-package version 2.3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gridExtra/gridExtra.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Barnier, Julien (2017). Package ‘questionr’: Functions to Make Surveys Processing Easier. R-package version 0.6.2. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/questionr/questionr.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017).
• Bernaards, Paul & Jennrich, Robert (2015). Package ‘GPArotation’: GPA Factor Rotation. R-package version 2014.11-1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GPArotation/GPArotation.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Champely, Stephane, Ekstrom, Claus, Dalgaard, Peter, Gill, Jeffrey, Weibelzahl, Stephan, Anandkumar, Aditya, Ford, Clay, Volcic, Robert & Rosario, Helios De (2017). Package ‘pwr’: Basic Functions for Power Analysis. R-package version 1.2-1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/pwr.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017).
• Csardi, Gabor (2017). Package ‘igraph’: Network Analysis and Visualization. R-package version 1.1.2. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/igraph.pdf (last accessed: 22 January 2018).
• Dragulescu, Adrian A. (2015). Package ‘xlsx’: Read, write, format Excel 2007 and Excel 97/2000/XP/2003 files. R-package version 0.5.7. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/xlsx/xlsx.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Epskamp, Sacha, Costantini, Giulio, Haslbeck, Jonas, Cramer, Angelique O.J, Waldorp, Lourens J., Schmittmann, Verena D. & Borsboom, Denny (2017). Package ‘qgraph’: Graph Plotting Methods, Psychometric Data Visualization and Graphical Model Estimation. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/qgraph/qgraph.pdf (last accessed: 22 January 2018).
• Feinerer, Ingo, Hornik, Kurt & Artifex Software Inc (2017). Package ‘tm’: Text Mining Package. R-package version 0.7-3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tm/tm.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017).
• Fellows, Ian (2013). Package ‘wordcloud’: Word Clouds. R-package version 2.5. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/wordcloud/wordcloud.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017).
• Fox, John, Weisberg, Sanford, Adler, Daniel, Bates, Douglas, Baud-Bovy, Gabriel, Ellison, Steve, Firth, David, Friendly, Michael, Gorjanc, Gregor, Graves, Spencer, Heiberger, Richard, Laboissiere, Rafael, Monette, Georges, Murdoch, Duncan, Nilsson, Henric, Olge, Derek, Ripley, Brian, Venables, William, Winsemius, David, Zeileis, Achim & R-Core Team (2017a). Package ‘car’: Companion to Applied Regression. R-package version 2.1-5. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/car/car.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Fox, John, Weisberg, Sanford, Friendly, Michael, Hong, Jangman, Andersen, Robert, Firth, David, Taylor, Steve & R-Core Team (2017b). Package ‘effects’: Effects Displays for Linear, Generalized Linear and Other Models. R-package version 4.0-0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/effects/effects.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Harrell, Frank E. (2017). Package ‘Hmisc’: Harrell Miscellaneous. R-package version 4.0-3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/Hmisc.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017).
• Hlavac, Marek (2015). Package ‘stargazer’: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. R-package version 5.2. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/stargazer/stargazer.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Koenker, Roger, Portnoy, Stephen, Tian Ng, Pin, Zeileis, Achim, Grosjean, Philip & Ripley, Brian (2017). Package ‘quantreg’: Quantile Regression. R-package version 5.33. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/quantreg/quantreg.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017).
• Krivitsky, Pavel N. & Bender-deMoll, Skye (2017). Package ‘statnet.common’: Common R Scripts and Utilities Used by the Statnet Project Software. R-package version 4.0.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/statnet.common/statnet.common.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2018).
• Massicotte, Philippe & Edelbuettel, Dirk (2017). Package ‘gtrendsR’: Perform and Display Google Trends Queries. R-package version 1.4.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gtrendsR/gtrendsR.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017).
• Oksanen, Jari, Blanchet, F. Guillaume, Friendly, Michael, Kindt, Roeland, Legendre, Pierre, McGlinn, Dan, Minchin, Peter R., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, Gavin L., Solymos, Peter, Stevens, M.Henry H., Szoecs, Eduard & Wagner, Helene (2017). Package ‘vegan’: Community Ecology Package. R-package version 2.4-5. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf (last accessed: 23 January 2018).
• R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Core 3.4.1. Available online at: http://www.R-project.org/ (last accessed: 22 January 2018).
• Revelle, William (2017). Package ‘psych’: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. R-package version 1.7.8. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/psych.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Temple Lang, Duncan & CRAN Team (2017). Package ‘XML’: Tools for Parsing and Generating XML Within R and S-Plus. R-package version 3.89-1.9. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/XML/XML.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017).
• van Borkulo, Claudia (2016). Package ‘NetworkComparisonTest’: Statistical Comparison of Two Networks Based on Three Invariance Measures. R-package version 2.0.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/NetworkComparisonTest/NetworkComparisonTest.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017).
• van Borkulo, Claudia, Epskamp, Sacha & Robitzsch, Alexander (2016). Package ‘IsingFit’: Fitting Ising Models Using the ELasso Method. R-package version 0.3.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/IsingFit/IsingFit.pdf (last accessed: 22 January 2018).
• Wei, Taiyun (2016). Package ‘corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. R-package version 0.77. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/corrplot/corrplot.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Wickham, Hadley (2017). Package ‘reshape2’: Flexibly Reshape Data: A Reboot of the Reshape Package. R-package version 1.4.3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/reshape2/reshape2.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017).
• Wickham, Hadley, Chang, Winston & RStudio (2016). Package ‘ggplot2’: Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics. R-package version 2.2.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/ggplot2.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Wickham, Hadley & RStudio (2017a). Package ‘httr’: Tools for Working with URLs and HTTP. R-packages version 1.3.1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/httr/httr.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Wickham, Hadley & RStudio (2017b). Package ‘stringr’: Simple consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations. R-package version 1.2.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/stringr/stringr.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017).
• Wickham, Hadley, Miller, Evan & RStudio (2017a). Package ‘haven’: Import and Export ‘SPSS’, ‘STATA’ and ‘SAS’ Files. R-package version 1.1.0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/haven/haven.pdf (last accessed: 22 September 2017).
• Wickham, Hadley, Francois, Romain, Henry, Lionel, Müller, Kirill & RStudio (2017b). Package ‘dplyr’: A grammar of Data Manipulation. R-package version 0.7.3. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dplyr/dplyr.pdf (last accessed: 19 September 2017).
• Wickham, Hadley, Chang, Winston, RStudio & R-Core Team (2017c). Package ‘devtools’: Tools to Make Developing R Packages Easier. R-package version 1.13.4. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/devtools/devtools.pdf (last accessed: 19 December 2017).