Zusammenfassung
Dieser Band bietet einen zugänglichen Überblick über die aktuelle Rechtslage der Versammlungsfreiheit in ausgewählten Mitgliedstaaten der Venedigkommission: Großbritannien, Frankreich, die USA, Belgien, Deutschland, die Türkei, Russland, die Ukraine, Polen, Ungarn und Tunesien. Er dient als Nachschlagewerk für Wissenschaftler und Praktiker, die spezifische Informationen zur Rechtslage, Beschränkungen, oder Anwendungen der Versammlungsfreiheit in einem der ausgewählten Länder suchen. Gleichfalls enthalten sind Kapitel zu aktuellen Fragen wie dem Einsatz von Flashmobs. Der Vergleich wird nicht nur durch die identische Struktur der einzelnen Länderstudien ermöglicht, sondern auch durch das abschließende Kapitel, in dem alle untersuchten Länder Punkt für Punkt verglichen werden. Neben Informationen zu Einzelheiten des Versammlungsrechts enthalten die Kapitel Informationen über aktuelle Ereignisse und Debatten im Recht der Versammlungsfreiheit wie etwa die Neuerungen im tunesischen, türkischen oder ukrainischen Versammlungsrecht nach dem Arabischen Frühling, der Verfassungsänderung in der Ukraine und den Gezi-Park-Protesten.
<b>Mit Beiträgen von:</b>
Anne Peters, Isbelle Ley, Elif Askin, Melina Garcin, Rainer Grote, Jannika Jahn, Steven Less, Halyna Perepelyuk, Orsolya Salát, Maria Stozek, Evgeniya Yushkova, Friederike Ziemer
Abstract
This volume presents an accessible overview over the current state of the legislation on the freedom of assembly in eleven selected member states of the Venice Commission: the UK, France, the US, Belgium, Germany, Turkey, the Russian Federation, the Ukraine, Poland, Hungary and Tunisia. The volume may serve as a work of reference for the researcher or practitioner who seeks specific information on the legal bases, restrictions, or implementation of the freedom of assembly in a specific country or on more recent themes such as the legal implications of flashmobs. It is also a helpful starting point for anyone interested in comparing the state of assembly legislation in Europe and beyond. Next to information on details of the domestic regulation of assemblies, each study contains information on recent events, changes and debates on the laws on assemblies. Examples are the handling of the Arab spring in Tunisia, freedom of assembly-implications and management of the Gezi Park protests in Turkey, or the constitutional upheavals in the Ukraine.
<b>With contributions by:</b>
Anne Peters, Isbelle Ley, Elif Askin, Melina Garcin, Rainer Grote, Jannika Jahn, Steven Less, Halyna Perepelyuk, Orsolya Salát, Maria Stozek, Evgeniya Yushkova, Friederike Ziemer
- 49–66 3 France 49–66
- 103–120 5 Belgium 103–120
- 121–136 6 Germany 121–136
- 137–174 7 Turkey 137–174
- 175–198 8 The Russian Federation 175–198
- 199–216 9 Ukraine 199–216
- 217–232 10 Poland 217–232
- 233–260 11 Hungary 233–260
- 261–276 12 Tunisia 261–276
- 333–338 Bibliography 333–338
- 339–342 Contributors 339–342
- Abu El-Haj, Tabatha, ‘The Neglected Right of Assembly’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 255–257.
- Abu El-Haj, Tabatha, ‘The Neglected Right of Assembly’, UCLA Law Review 56 (2009), 543–589.
- Ajevski, Marjan, ‘Fragmentation in International Human Rights Law: Beyond Conflict of Laws’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32 (2014), 87–98. doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2014.897795
- Arbeitskreis Versammlungsrecht (Mathias Hong/Christoph Enders/Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem/Michael Kniesel/Ralf Poscher/Helmuth Schulze-Fielitz), Musterentwurf eines Versammlungsgesetzes (München: C.H. Beck 2011).
- Ayata, Gökçeçiçek et al., Gezi Parkı Olayları: Gezi Parkı Olayları İnsan Hakları Hukuku ve Siyasi Söylem Işığında bir İnceleme (Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları 2013).
- Aydın-Düzgit, Senem, ‘Human Rights in Turkey’, in Carmen Rodríguez et al. (eds), Turkey’s Democratisation Process (London/New York: Routledge 2014), 312–329.
- Aziz, Miriam, The Impact of European Rights on National Legal Cultures (Oxford: Hart 2004).
- Bakhama, Michael, ‘Building Picket Fences: Maryland’s Funeral Picketing Law After Snyder v. Phelps’, Maryland Law Review 71 (2012), 1231–1257.
- Bartlett, Jamie et al., New Political Actors in Europe: New Opposition Movements in Hungary (London: Demos 2013).
- Bartlett, Jamie et al., Populism in Europe: Hungary – The Rise of Populism in Europe Can Be Traced Through Online Behaviour (London: Demos 2013).
- Benda, Ernst, ʻArtikel 8 – Versammlungsfreiheitʼ, in Wolfgang Kahl/Christian Waldhoff/Christian Walter (eds), Bonner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, Volume 3 (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller 73rd Batch 1995).
- Blanke, Thomas/Sterzel, Dieter, ʻGeschichte und demokratische Funktion der Demonstrationsfreiheitʼ, Kritische Justiz 14 (1981), 347–369. doi.org/10.5771/0023-4834-1981-4-347
- Bodnar, Adam, ‘Shaping the Freedom of Assembly: Counter-Productive Effects of the Polish Road towards Illiberal Democracy’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstration (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing 2009), 165–188.
- von Bogdandy, Armin, ‘Comparative Constitutional Law: A Continental Perspective’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 25–37. doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199578610.003.0001
- Bonner, David/Stone, Richard, ‘The Public Order Act 1986 – Steps in the Wrong Direction’, Public Law 31 (1987), 202–230.
- Bröhmer, Jürgen, ‘Versammlungs- und Vereinigungsfreiheit’, in Oliver Dörr/Rainer Grote/Thilo Marauhn (eds), EMRK/GG – Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2nd edn 2013), 1161–1232.
- Bullock, Karen/Johnson, Paul, ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on Policing in England and Wales’, The British Journal of Criminology 52 (2011), 1–21.
- Chang, Wen-Chen/Yeh, Jiunn-Rong, ‘Internationalization of Constitutional Law’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 1165–1184. doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0058
- Choudhry, Sujit (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006).
- Cole, David, ‘Hanging with the Wrong Crowd: Of Gangs, Terrorists, and the Right of Association’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 207–216.
- Colliard, Claude-Albert, Libertés publiques (Paris: Dalloz 8th edn 2005).
- de Meyer, Jan, Staatsrecht (Leuven: Wouters 4th edn 1963).
- Delpérée, Francis, Le droit constitutionnel de la Belgique (Brussels: Bruylant 2000).
- Duffar, Jean, Les libertés collectives (Paris: Montchrestien 1996).
- Dupriez, Léon, La liberté de réunion (Brussels: Lesigne 1887).
- Erkoc, Taptuk, ‘Taksim Gezi Park Protests: Birth and Backlash of a Political Sphere’, in Bülent Gökay and Ilia Xypolia (eds), Reflections on Taksim – Gezi Park Protests in Turkey (Keele: A Journal of Global Faultlines Publication 2013), 43–46.
- Farber, Daniel A., The First Amendment (New York: The Foundation Press 2nd edn 2003).
- Fenwick, Helen, ‘Marginalising Human Rights: Breach of the Peace, “Kettling”, the Human Rights Act and Public Protest’, Public Law 53 (2009), 737–765.
- Foster, Steve, Human Rights and Civil Liberties (London: Longman 3rd edn 2011).
- Frowein, Jochen A., ‘The Transformation of Constitutional Law through the European Convention on Human Rights’, Human Rights Journal 35 (2015), 1–8.
- Gardbaum, Stephen, ‘The Structure and Scope of Constitutional Rights’, in Tom Ginsburg/Rosalind Dixon (eds), Comparative Constitutional Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2011), 387–405. doi.org/10.4337/9780857931214.00030
- Gargarella, Robert, ‘A Dialogue on Law and Social Protest’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009), 61–86.
- Gökay, Bülent/Xypolia, Ilia, ‘Editorial’, in Bülent Gökay and Ilia Xypolia (eds), Reflections on Taksim – Gezi Park Protests in Turkey (Keele: A Journal of Global Faultlines Publication 2013), 1–2.
- Gönenç, Levent, ‘The 2001 Amendments to the 1982 Constitution of Turkey’, Ankara Law Review 1 (2004), 89–109. doi.org/10.1501/Lawrev_0000000007
- Graff, Agnieszka, ‘We Are (Not All) Homophobes: A Report from Poland’, Feminist Studies 32 (2006), 434–449. doi.org/10.2307/20459096
- Gruszczynska, Anna, ‘Living La Vida Internet. Some Notes on the Cyberization of Polish LGBT Community’, in Roman Kuhar and Judit Takacs (eds), Beyond the Pink Curtain: Everyday Life of LGBT People in Eastern Europe (Ljubljana: Mirovni Peace Institute 2006), 95–115.
- Györfi, Tamás, ‘The Importance of Freedom of Assembly: Three Models of Justification’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009), 1–16.
- Hajas, Barnabás, A gyülekezési jog egyes aktuális elméleti és gyakorlati kérdései, doktori értekezés [Some Actual Theoretical and Practical Problems of the Right to Assembly], Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pécs, 2012.
- Hajas, Barnabás, Gyülekezési jogi projekt [Project on the right to assembly] (Budapest: Országgyűlési Biztos Hivatala 2009).
- Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang, ʻStandards für die Verwirklichung der Versammlungsfreiheit in Europaʼ, in Wolfgang Durner/Franz-Joseph Peine/Fouroud Shirvani (eds), Freiheit und Sicherheit in Deutschland und Europa (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2013), 267–287.
- Iancu, Alexandra, ‘“Europeanization” versus “New Localism” in Shaping Fundamental Rights: “Free Speech” Definitions, Limitations, and Deadlocks in new Democracies’, in Manuel Gutan/Bianca Selejan Gutan (eds), Europeanization and Judicial Culture in Contemporary Democracies (Bukarest: Hamangiu 2014), 148–177.
- Inazu, John D., Liberty’s Refuge: The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly (New Haven: Yale University Press 2012).
- Inazu, John D., ‘The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly’, Tulane Law Review 84 (2010), 565–612.
- International Center for Not-for-Profit Law, ‘Arab Spring: An Opportunity for Greater Freedom of Association and Assembly in Tunisia and Egypt?’, 3 Global Trends in NGO Law (2011), issue 1.
- Kanovitz, Jacqueline, Constitutional Law for Criminal Justice (New York: Routledge 2015).
- Kanovitz, Jacqueline R./Kanovitz, Michael I., Constitutional Law (Newark: Matthew Bender/LexisNexis Group 11th edn 2008).
- Kant, Immanuel, ʻÜber den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis, Section II – Vom Verhältnis der Theorie zur Praxis im Staatsrechtʼ, in Immanuel Kant, Werke in 12 Bänden, edited by Wilhelm Weischedel, vol. 11 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1977).
- Kant, Immanuel, ʻOn the Old Saw – That May be Right in Theory but It Won’t Work in Practiceʼ, in Hans Reiss (ed.): Kant’s Political Writings, translated by Hugh Barry Nisbet (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1970).
- Kellum, Nathan W., ‘If it Looks Like a Duck … Traditional Public Forum Status of Open Areas of Public University Campuses’, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterley 33 (2005–2006) 1–45.
- Lavalleye, Paul, ‘Les droits de l’homme et les libertés fondamentales en Belgique’, in Pelloux, Robert (ed.), Essais sur les droits de l’homme en Europe (Paris: Bibliothèque Européenne 1959), 19–42.
- Law, David S., ‘Generic Constitutional Law’, Minnesota Law Review 89 (2004–2005), 652–742.
- Legrand, Pierre, ‘Antivonbar’, Journal of Comparative Law 1 (2006), 13–40.
- Legrand, Pierre, ‘European Legal Systems are not Converging’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45 (1996), 52–81. doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300058656
- Lepsius, Oliver, ‘Versammlungsrecht und gesellschaftliche Integrationʼ, in Anselm Doering-Manteufel/Bernd Greiner/Oliver Lepsius (eds), Der Brokdorf-Beschluss (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2015), 113–165.
- Mazzone, Jason, ‘Freedom’s Associations’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 26–31.
- McAllister, Stephen R., ‘Picketing Laws and Free Speech’, University of Kansas Law Review 55 (2006–2007), 575–627.
- Mead, David, ‘A Chill Through the Back Door? The Privatised Regulation of Peaceful Protest’, Public Law 57 (2013), 10–118.
- Menanteau, Maurice, Les nouveaux aspects de la liberté de réunion (Paris: Librairie technique et économique 1937).
- Miller, Lindsay/Toliver, Jessica/Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned (Washington, D.C.: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 2014).
- Miller, Russell A., An Introduction to German Law and Legal Culture: Text and Materials (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press forthcoming 2016).
- Neumann, Conrad, ‘Flasmobs, Smartmobs, Massenpartys – Die rechtliche Beurteilung moderner Kommunikations- und Interaktionsformen’, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (2011), 1171–1177.
- Newman, Christopher, ‘Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986: The Threshold of Extreme Protest’, Journal of Criminal Law 76 (2012), 105–109. doi.org/10.1350/jcla.2012.76.2.755
- Olgun, Akbulut, ‘Toplantı ve Örgütlenme Özgürlükleri’, in Sibel İnceoğlu (ed.), Insan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi ve Anayasa. Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru Kapsamında Bir İnceleme (Istanbul: Beta Yayınları 3rd edn 2013), 381–424.
- Orban, Oscar, Le droit constitutionnel de la Belgique (Liège: Dessain 1911).
- Ott, Sieghart/Wächtler Hartmut/Heinold, Hubert, Gesetz über Versammlungen und Aufzüge (Stuttgart: Boorberg 7th edn 2010).
- Özbudun, Ergün, ‘Turkey’s Search for a New Constitution’, Insight Turkey 14 (2012), 39–50.
- Özbudun, Ergun/Türkmen, Füsün, ‘Impact of the ECtHR Rulings on Turkey`s Democratisation: An Evaluation’, Human Rights Quarterly, 35 (2013), 985–1008. doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0054
- Pasqualucci, Jo M., ‘The Harmonization of Human Rights Law: Guaranteeing the Plurality of Individual Rights’, in Larry Catá Backer (ed.), Harmonizing Law in an Era of Globalization (Durham: Carolina Academic Press 2007), 35–54.
- Peters, Anne/Preuß, Ulrich K., ‘International Relations and International Law’, in Mark Tushnet/Thomas Fleiner/Cheryl Saunders (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law (London: Routledge 2013), 33–44. doi.org/10.4324/9780203072578.ch3
- Peters, Anne, ‘The Globalization of State Constitutions’, in Janne Nijman/André Nollkaemper (eds), New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007), 251–308. doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231942.003.0011
- Peters, Anne/Schwenke, Heiner, ‘Comparative Law beyond Post-modernism’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49 (2000), 800–834. doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300064666
- Phillipps, Zachary J., ‘The Unavoidable Implication of McCullen v. Coakley: Protection Against Unwelcome Speech is not a Sufficient Justification for Restricting Speech in Traditional Public Fora’, Connecticut Law Review 47 (2015), 937–969.
- Pieters, Danny, ‘Belgien’, in Eberhard Grabitz (ed.), Grundrechte in Europa und USA, vol. I (Kehl: Engel 1986), 1–84.
- Preuß, Ulrich K., ‘Associative Rights (the Rights to the Freedom of Petition, Assembly, and Association)’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 948–966. doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0047
- Ripke, Stefan, Europäische Versammlungsfreiheit (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2012). doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-152094-5
- Rodríguez, Carmen/Ávalos, Antonio/Yılmaz, Hakan/Planet, Ana I., ‘Democratisation Processes in Defective Democracies. The Case of Turkey’, in Carmen Rodríguez et al. (eds), Turkey’s Democratisation Process (London/New York: Routledge 2014), 3–15.
- Roellecke, Gerd, ʻVersammlungsfreiheitʼ in Görres-Gesellschaft (ed.), Staatslexikon: Recht, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Freiburg: Herder Verlag 7th edn 1989), vol. V, Column 707–711.
- Russell, Margaret M., ‘Editor’s Introduction’ and ‘Editor’s Note, Part II’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 21–23; 43–46.
- Russell, Margaret M., ‘Editor’s Note, Part III’, in Margaret M. Russell (ed.), Freedom of Assembly and Petition (The First Amendment): Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate (New York: Prometheus Books 2010), 185–188.
- Sajó, András (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009).
- Salát, Orsolya, The Right to Freedom of Assembly: A Comparative Study (Oxford: Hart 2015).
- Salát, Orsolya, ‘Comparative Freedom of Assembly and the Fragmentation of International Human Rights’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32 (2014), 140–156. doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2014.896971
- Schmitt, Carl, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, translated by Ellen Kennedy (Boston: MIT Press 1988).
- Schmitt, Carl, Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2nd edn 1926, Reprint 2010). doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-48839-1
- Schulze-Fielitz, Helmuth, ‘Artikel 8 – Versammlungsfreiheit’, in Horst Dreier (ed.), Grundgesetz-Kommentar, Band I (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 3rd edn 2013), 1022–1077.
- Smilov, Daniel, ‘The Power of the Assembled People: The Right to Assembly and Political Representation’, in András Sajó (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstrations (Utrecht: Eleven 2009), 87–104.
- Spielman, Dean, ‘Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Systems of Europe’, in Michel Rosenfeld/András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), 1231–1252.
- Stone, Richard, ‘Breach of the Peace: the Case for Abolition’, Web Journal of Current Legal issues 2 (2001).
- Stone, Richard, Civil Liberties and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press 9th edn 2012).
- Sztente, Zoltán, ‘The Decline of Constitutional Review in Hungary: Towards a Partisan Constitutional Court?’, in Zoltán Szente/Fanni Mandák/Zsuzsanna Fejes (eds), Challenges and Pitfalls in the Recent Hungarian Constitutional Development. Discussing the New Fundamental Law of Hungary (Paris: L’Harmattan 2015), 185–210.
- The Law Commission, ‘Criminal Law: Offences Relating to Public Order (Law Com. No. 123)’, The Modern Law Review 47 (1984), 324–333. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1984.tb01655.x
- Ulrich, Norbert, Das Demonstrationsrecht im Spannungsfeld von Meinungsfreiheit, Versammlungsfreiheit und öffentlicher Sicherheit (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2015).
- Versteeg, Mila/Goderis, Benedikt, ‘The Diffusion of Constitutional Rights’, International Review of Law and Economics 39 (2015), 1–19.
- Volokh, Eugene, ‘Gruesome Speech’, Cornell Law Review 100 (2015), 901–952.
- Weaver, Russell L./Lively, Donald E., Understanding the First Amendment (Newark: Matthew Bender/LexisNexis Group 2003).
- Werhan, Keith, Freedom of Speech: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers 2004).
- Wigny, Pierre, Cours de droit constitutionnel (Brussels: Bruylant 1973).
- Wölker, Ulrich, Zu Freiheit und Grenzen der politischen Betätigung von Ausländern (Berlin: Springer 1987). doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95551-8_13
- Zaichuk, Oleg/Onishchenko, Natalya, Theory of State and Law: Academic Course (Kiev: Inter Yurinkom 2006).