Exploring the Institutionalisation of Science Diplomacy

Schlagworte

Deutsche Wissenschafts- und Innovationshäuser development Deutschland, Schweiz establishment functioning Diplomatie Germany, Switzerland Entwicklung governance Funktionsweise Governance institutionalization Gründung national context Science and Innovations Centres Innovationszentren science diplomacy Institutionalisierung internationale Beziehungen nationaler Kontext Swissnex Wissenschaft Wissenschaftsdiplomatie Wissenschaftszentren

• AAAS Center for Science Diplomacy (2009). Science and Diplomacy: A Conceptual Framework.
• Adamson, M., & Lalli, R. (2021). Global perspectives on science diplomacy: Exploring the diplomacy‐knowledge nexus in contemporary histories of science. Centaurus, 63(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12369
• Adler-Nissen, R. (2014). Symbolic power in European diplomacy: The struggle between national foreign services and the EU's External Action Service. Review of International Studies, 40(4), 657–681. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210513000326
• AG Science Diplomacy (2019). Science Diplomacy 2020 – Eckpunkte einer neuen Strategie: AKBP-Strategieprozess. Berlin.
• Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2005). Organizations and meta-organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(4), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2005.09.005
• Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2008). Meta-organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Seidl, D. (2016). Resurrecting organization by going beyond organizations. European Management Journal, 34(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.003
• Alberts, B. (2010). Policy-Making Needs Science. Science, 330(6009), 1287. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200613
• Allison, G. T. (1968). Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis: Rational Policy, Organization Process, and Bureaucratic Politics (P-3919). California.
• Almeida Domingues, A., & Ribeiro Neto, P. H. (2017). Science Diplomacy as a tool of international politics: the power of "soft power". Brazilian Journal of International Relations, 6(3), 607–629.
• Altbach, P. G. (2001). Academic freedom: International realities and challenges. Higher Education, 41, 205–219.
• Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution: A Report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education. Paris.
• Ammon, P. (2009, January 20). Rede von Staatssekretär Peter Ammon zur Auftaktkonferenz der Initiative Außenwissenschaft 2009 [Press release]. Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2009/090120-StSAmmon-AWP.html
• Anheier, H. K. (2017). Die Auswärtige Kultur- und Bildungspolitik Deutschlands im internationalen Vergleich: Zwischenbericht. Berlin: Hertie School of Governance.
• Aukes, E., Ordonez-Matamoros, G., & Kuhlmann, S. (2019). Meta-Governance for Science Diplomacy – towards a European framework (STePS Working Paper Series No. 2019/01). Enschede.
• Auswärtiges Amt (Ed.) (2009a). Wissenswelten verbinden. Deutsche Außenpolitik für mehr Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung: Konferenzdokumentation. Edition Diplomatie. Berlin.
• Auswärtiges Amt (2009b, January 14). Wissenswelten verbinden. - Auftaktkonferenz zur Initiative Außenwissenschaftspolitik [Press release]. Berlin. Retrieved from https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/de/newsroom/090114-awp/212790
• Auswärtiges Amt (2011). Auswärtige Kultur- und Bildungspolitik in Zeiten der Globalisierung: Partner gewinnen, Werte vermitteln, Interessen vertreten. Berlin.
• Auswärtiges Amt (2012, October 26). Außenstaatssekretärin Haber eröffnet Deutsches Wissenschafts- und Innovationshaus in Neu Delhi [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2012/121026-StSH_DWIH.html
• Auswärtiges Amt (2013). 16. Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik 2011/2012. Berlin.
• Auswärtiges Amt (2014, February 14). 17. Bericht der Bundesregierung Auswärtige Kultur- und Bildungspolitik. Berlin. Retrieved from Auswärtiges Amt website: https://www.bundesrat.de/bv.html?id=0059-14
• Auswärtiges Amt (2015). 18. Bericht der Bundesregierung Auswärtige Kultur- und Bildungspolitik 2013 / 2014: Grenzen überbrücken – Werte teilen – Wissen schaffen – die Auswärtige Kultur- und Bildungspolitik in globaler Verantwortung. Berlin.
• Auswärtiges Amt (2016). 19. Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik: Kultur, Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kommunikation in globaler Verantwortung. Berlin.
• Auswärtiges Amt (2017). 20. Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik 2016: Menschen bewegen: Dialogräume schaffen Brücken bauen Perspektiven entwickeln. Berlin.
• Auswärtiges Amt (2019a). 21. Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik für das Jahr 2017: Zugang zu Kultur und Bildung: Kulturelle Freiräume schaffen und gestalten. Berlin. Retrieved from Auswärtiges Amt website: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blueprint/servlet/blob/2177718/893ae0d7033056d7f6ce7e51a61d42e0/akbp-bericht-2017-data.pdf
• Auswärtiges Amt (2019b). 22. Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik für das Jahr 2018: Europa stärken. Freiräume schützen. Innovationen fördern. Berlin.
• Auswärtiges Amt (2019c). Grundprinzipien deutscher Außenpolitik. Retrieved from https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/de/aussenpolitik/themen/grundprinzipien/216474#content_5
• Auswärtiges Amt (2020a). Wissenschaftsdiplomatie. Retrieved from https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/de/aussenpolitik/themen/kulturdialog/-/212804
• Auswärtiges Amt (2020b, October 9). 23. Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik für das Jahr 2019. Berlin.
• Auswärtiges Amt (December 2020c). Science Diplomacy. Berlin.
• Auswärtiges Amt (2021). 24. Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik für das Jahr 2020. Berlin.
• Axworthy, L. (2013). The Political Actors: President, Prime Minister, and Minister of Foreign Affairs. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (pp. 92–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ayebare Nyakato, R., & Kyora, S. (2015). A roadmap for the swissnex network. Retrieved from https://www.startupticker.ch/en/news/december-2015/a-roadmap-for-the-swissnex-network
• Babbie, E. (2004). The Practice of Social Research (10th edn.). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
• Bach, T., & Jann, W. (2010). Animals in the Administrative Zoo: Organizational Change and Agency autonomy in Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852310372448
• Bache, I. (2010). Partnership as an EU Policy Instrument: A Political History. West European Politics, 33(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903354080
• Badout, P.‑Y. (2011). Uncertain Instruments: The Computerization of Public Administration and Changes in Public Policy (1966–1975). Revue Française De Science Politique (English Edition), 61(1), 69–93.
• Bali, A. S., Capano, G., & Ramesh, M. (2019). Anticipating and designing for policy effectiveness. Policy and Society, 38(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1579502
• Ball, P. (2021). Science Is Political, and We Must Deal with It. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 12(27), 6336–6340. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02017
• Balzacq, T., Charillon, F., & Ramel, F. (eds.) (2019). The Sciences Po series in international relations and political economy. Global diplomacy: An introduction to Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bemelmans-Videc, M. L. (1998). Introduction. Policy Instrument Choice and Evaluation. In M. L. Bemelmans-Videc, R. C. Rist, & E. Vedung (eds.), Comparative policy analysis series. Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments and their Evaluation (pp. 1–18). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
• Bemelmans-Videc, M. L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. (eds.) (1998). Comparative policy analysis series. Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments and their Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
• Bendor, J., & Hammond, T. H. (1992). Rethinking Allison's Models. The American Political Science Review, 86(2), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964222
• Berg, L.‑P. (2010). Science Diplomacy Networks. In FDFA (ed.), Swiss Science Diplomacy (Politorbis – Zeitschrift zur Aussenpolitik No. 49, pp. 69–74). Bern: FDFA.
• Berkman, P. A., Lang, Michael, A., Walton, D. W., & Young, Oran, R. (eds.) (2011). Science Diplomacy: Antarctica, and the governance of international spaces. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
• Bertelsen, R. G. (2018). The Arctic as a Laboratory of Global Governance: The Case of Knowledge-Based Cooperation and Science Diplomacy. In M. Finger & L. Heininen (eds.), The Globalarctic Handbook (1st edn., pp. 251–267). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91995-9_15
• Bevir, M. (2006). How Narratives Explain. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 163–168). Armonk, NY u. a.: M. E. Sharpe.
• BMBF (2008). Deutschlands Rolle in der globalen Wissensgesellschaft stärken: Strategie der Bundesregierung zur Internationalisierung von Wissenschaft und Forschung. Bonn.
• BMBF (2014). Internationale Kooperation: Aktionsplan des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung. Berlin. Retrieved from BMBF website: https://www.bmbf.de/pub/Aktionsplan_Internationale_Kooperation.pdf
• BMBF (2017a). Internationalisierung von Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung: Strategie der Bundesregierung. Bonn.
• BMBF (Juni 2017b). Bericht der Bundesregierung zur internationalen Kooperation in Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung 2014–2016. Bonn.
• BMBF (2018). Bundesbericht Forschung und Innovation 2018: Forschungs- und innovationspolitische Ziele und Maßnahmen. Berlin.
• BMBF (2019). Bericht der Bundesregierung zur internationalen Kooperation in Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung 2017–2018. Bonn.
• BMBF (2020a). BMBF-Preis für Bildungs- und Wissenschaftsdiplomatie für laufende und abgeschlossene wissenschaftliche Projekte. Retrieved from https://www.nks-lebenswissenschaften.de/de/3188.php
• BMBF (2020b). Bundesbericht Forschung und Innovation 2020: Forschungs- und innovationspolitische Ziele und Maßnahmen. Berlin.
• BMBF (2021). Bericht der Bundesregierung zur internationalen Kooperation in Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung 2019–2020: Politische Kurzfassung. Bonn.
• Bogner, A., & Menz, W. (2001). „Deutungswissen“ und Interaktion: Zu Methodologie und Methodik des theoriegenerierenden Experteninterviews. Soziale Welt, 52, 477–500.
• Boon, W., & Edler, J. (2018). Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy014
• Borchardt, A., & Göthlich, S. E. (2009). Erkenntnisgewinnung durch Fallstudien. In S. Albers, D. Klapper, U. Konradt, A. Walter, & J. Wolf (eds.), Methodik der empirischen Forschung (3rd edn., 33-48). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
• Borgwardt, A. (ed.) (2009). Wissenschaftsaußenpolitik: Deutschland als Knotenpunkt im weltweiten Wissensnetzwerk; Konferenzbericht der Veranstaltung vom 13. November 2008 Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (1. Aufl.). Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
• Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
• Brand Finance (2020). Global Soft Power Index 2020: The world's most comprehensive research study on perceptions of soft power.
• Braun, D. (1993). Politische Steuerungsfähigkeit in intermediären Systemen am Beispiel der Forschungsförderung. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 34(2), 249–271.
• Braun, D., & Capano, G. (2010). Introductory Paper: The missing link – Policy Ideas and Policy Instruments (European Consortium for Political Research Workshop). Münster.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Bressers, H. T. A., & O'Toole, L. J. (1998). The Selection of Policy Instruments: a Network-based Perspective. Journal of Public Policy, 18(3), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X98000117
• Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing Organizations: The Example of Public Sector Reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600214003
• Bundesministerium der Finanzen (2020). Finanzbericht 2021: Stand und voraussichtliche Entwicklung der Finanzwirtschaft im gesamtwirtschaftlichen Zusammenhang. Berlin.
• Der Bundesrat (2015, September 30). swissnex Singapore schliesst die Türen, Bildungs- und Wissenschaftsbüro an Botschaft neu eröffnet [Press release]. Bern. Retrieved from https://www.admin.ch/gov/de/start/dokumentation/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-58932.html
• Bundesrechnungshof (2013). Auswärtiges Amt: Wissenschafts- und Innovationshäuser des Auswärtigen Amtes tragen sich weiterhin nicht selbst. In Bundesrechnungshof (ed.), Bemerkungen 2013 zur Haushalts- und Wirtschaftsführung des Bundes. Bonn,
• Burkhalter, D. (2010, October 28). Celebration of the 10-year anniversary of swissnex Boston – «Toward to the next decade of connecting the dots»: Cambridge (USA), 28.10.2010 – Allocution du Conseiller fédéral Didier Burkhalter – Seule la version orale fait foi. [Press release]. Bern. Retrieved from https://www.admin.ch/gov/fr/accueil/documentation/communiques.msg-id-36122.html
• Capano, G. (2018). Policy design spaces in reforming governance in higher education: the dynamics in Italy and the Netherlands. Higher Education, 75(4), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0158-5
• Capano, G. (2019). Reconceptualizing layering – From mode of institutional change to mode of institutional design: Types and outputs. Public Administration, 13, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12583
• Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568
• Capano, G., & Lippi, A. (2017). How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers’ choices. Policy Sciences, 50(2), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9267-8
• Capano, G., Pritoni, A., & Vicentini, G. (2019). Do policy instruments matter? Governments’ choice of policy mix and higher education performance in Western Europe. Journal of Public Policy, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X19000047
• Capoccia, G., & Keleman, D. R. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–369.
• Caporaso, J. A. (2007). The promises and pitfalls of an endogenous theory of institutional change: A comment. West European Politics, 30(2), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701239921
• Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.003
• Carosso, G. A., Ferreira, L. M. R., & Mostajo-Radji, M. A. (2019). Scientists as non-state actors of public diplomacy. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(11), 1129–1130. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0716-1
• Cassis, I. (2019, March 19). "The corals of Aqaba and the Red Sea, where science and diplomacy come together". Rede von Bundesrat Ignazio Cassis anlässlich der internationalen Konferenz zum Thema „Dialog zwischen Wissenschaft und Diplomatie“ [Press release]. Bern. Retrieved from https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/suche/suchresultat.html/content/eda/de/meta/speeches/2019/3/19/74380.html
• Chong, A. (2007). The Foreign Policy Potential of "Small State Soft Power" Information Strategies. Singapore: National University of Singapore.
• Chou, M.‑H., & Ulnicane, I. (2015). Introduction: New Horizons in the Europe of Knowledge. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 11(1), 4–15.
• Coleman, J. S. (2010). Grundlagen der Sozialtheorie: Band 1: Handlungen und Handlungssysteme (3rd edn.). Scientia Nova. München: Oldenbourg.
• Comtesse, X. (2000, January 26). Opinions. Un grand marché mondial de l'éducation se met en place. Le Temps. Retrieved from https://www.letemps.ch/opinions/opinions-un-grand-marche-mondial-leducation-se-met-place
• Comtesse, X. (2021). “swissnex was a breakthrough idea”. In Revealing the Dots: Eleven interviews with some of the most influential figures in swissnex’s 20-year history (pp. 6–9). Boston: Swissnex Boston.
• Constantinou, C. M., Kerr, P., & Sharp, P. (eds.) (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Constantinou, C. M., & Sharp, P. (2016). Theoretical Perspectives in Diplomacy. In C. M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, & P. Sharp (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy (pp. 13–27). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Cooper, A. F. (2013). The Changing Nature of Diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (pp. 35–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Cooper, A. F., Heine, J., & Thakur, R. (2013). Introduction: The Challenges of 21st-Century Diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (pp. 1–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Copeland, D. (2011). Science Diplomacy: What's It All About? (Policy Brief No. 13). Ottawa.
• Copeland, D. (2015). Science and diplomacy after Canada’s lost decade: Counting the costs, looking beyond.
• Cramer, K. C., & Hallonsten, O. (2020). Big science and research infrastructures in Europe. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Crawford, E., Shinn, T., & Sörlin, S. (1993). The Nationalization and Denationalization of the Sciences: An Introductory Essay. In E. Crawford, T. Shinn, & S. Sörlin (eds.), Sociology of the Sciences A Yearbook: Vol. 16. Denationalizing Science (Vol. 16, pp. 1–42). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1221-7_1
• Cremonini, L., Horlings, E., & Hessels, L. K. (2018). Different recipes for the same dish: Comparing policies for scientific excellence across different countries. Science and Public Policy, 45(2), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx062
• DAAD (2017, September 4). Gemeinsam und vernetzt international agieren [Press release]. Bonn. Retrieved from http://www.juraforum.de/wissenschaft/gemeinsam-und-vernetzt-international-agieren-602753
• DAAD (Juli 2018). Deutsche Wissenschafts- und Innovationshäuser: Jahresbericht 2017. Bonn. Retrieved from DAAD website: https://www.dwih-netzwerk.de/files/2018/08/DWIH-Jahresbericht-2017_D-E_komprimiert.pdf
• DAAD (2020, September 18). Neues Deutsches Wissenschafts- und Innovationshaus in San Francisco [Press release]. Bonn. Retrieved from https://www.daad.de/de/der-daad/kommunikation-publikationen/presse/pressemitteilungen/dwih-netzwerkerweiterung/
• DAAD (2022). Wissenschaft, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Hand in Hand für mehr Innovation (DUZ Magazin für Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft). Berlin.
• Darby, S. (2015). The Emperor's New Clothes — A Failure of Diplomacy in the Oil and Mining Sectors. In L. S. Davis & R. G. Patman (eds.), Science Diplomacy: New Day Or False Dawn?. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
• Davis, L. S., & Patman, R. G. (eds.) (2015). Science Diplomacy: New Day Or False Dawn? Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
• De Wit, H., & Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898
• De Wit, H., Hunter, F., Howard, L., & Egron-Polak, E. (2015). Internationalisation of Higher Education: Study. Brussels.
• Deutscher Bundestag (2010, March 4). Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Auswärtigen Kulturpolitik 2008/2009 (No. 17/970). Berlin.
• Deutscher Bundestag (2011, January 13). Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik 2009/2010 (No. 17/4413). Berlin.
• Deutscher Bundestag (2012, January 11). Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung: Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik 2010/2011. Retrieved from Bundesanzeiger Verlagsgesellschaft mbH website: http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/17/083/1708326.pdf
• Deutscher Bundestag (2013, June 25). Antrag: Deutschland in der globalen Wissensgesellschaft klar positionieren – Internationalisierung von Wissenschaft und Forschung weiter vorantreiben (No. Drucksache 17/14111). Berlin.
• Deutscher Bundestag (2017, March 16). 20. Bericht der Bundesregierung Auswärtige Kultur- und Bildungspolitik: Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung (Drucksache 18/11550).
• Deutscher Kulturrat e.V. (2018). Die dritte Säule: Beiträge zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik (Politik & Kultur No. 16). Berlin.
• Deutsches Wissenschafts- und Innovationshaus Moskau (2013). Deutsches Wissenschafts-und Innovationshaus (DWIH) Moskau 2010–2012. Moskau.
• Directorate-General of Global Affairs, Development and Partnerships (2013). Science Diplomacy for France: Report 2013.
• Dohjoka, N., Campbell, C. A., & Hill, B. (2017, March 17). Science Diplomacy in Arab Countries: The Need for a Paradigm Shift (Science & Diplomacy).
• Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121
• Dresing, T., & Pehl, T. (eds.) (2017). Praxisbuch Interview, Transkription & Analyse: Anleitungen und Regelsysteme für qualitativ Forschende (7th edn.). Marburg: Eigenverlag.
• Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E. (2002). Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
• Dufour, N. (2000a, April 14). La Suisse expérimente une nouvelle politique face à ses cerveaux expatriés. Le Temps. Retrieved from https://www.letemps.ch/suisse/suisse-experimente-une-nouvelle-politique-face-cerveaux-expatries
• Dufour, N. (2000b, October 12). A Nouvelle Economie, nouvelle diplomatie? Esquisse de réponse avec la Swiss House de Boston. Le Temps. Retrieved from https://www.letemps.ch/suisse/nouvelle-economie-nouvelle-diplomatie-esquisse-reponse-swiss-house-boston
• Dufour, N. (2000c, October 14). Quand une banque privée soutient la diplomatie suisse. Le Temps. Retrieved from https://www.letemps.ch/suisse/une-banque-privee-soutient-diplomatie-suisse
• Dusdal, J., & Powell, J. J. W. (2021). Benefits, Motivations, and Challenges of International Collaborative Research: A Sociology of Science Case Study. Science and Public Policy, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab010
• Dusdal, J., Zapp, M., Marques, M., & Powell, J. J. (2021). Higher Education Organizations as Strategic Actors in Networks: Institutional and Relational Perspectives Meet Social Network Analysis. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (eds.), Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (7th edn., pp. 55–73). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220210000007004
• DWIH-Netzwerk (2019). Objectives. Retrieved from https://www.dwih-netzwerk.de/en/who-we-are/objectives/
• DWIH-Netzwerk (2021). Organisation. Retrieved from https://www.dwih-netzwerk.de/de/ueber-uns/organisation/
• Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001
• Edler, J., Kuhlmann, S., & Stegmaier, P. (2010). Fragmentierung und Koordination – Governance der Wissenschafts- und Innovationspolitik in Deutschland. In M. Seckelmann, S. Lange, & T. Horstmann (eds.), Die Gemeinschaftsaufgaben von Bund und Ländern in der Wissenschafts- und Bildungspolitik: Analysen und Erfahrungen (pp. 169–194). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
• Eggenberger, C. (1986). Die Stiftung " Pro Helvetia" als Vermittlerin schweizerischer Kunst im Ausland. Zeitschrift Für Schweizerische Archäologie Und Kunstgeschichte, 43(4), 417–428.
• Egger, P. (2013). Vorwort. In Wissenschaftsdiplomatie: Die Schweiz vernetzt sich neu (Dossier: «Wissenschaftsdiplomatie» Ausgabe 1003, p. 54).
• Elken, M. (2015). Developing policy instruments for education in the EU: the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(6), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2015.1103795
• Embassy of Finland, Washington D.C. (2016, July 14). Nordic Cooperation in Silicon Valley [Press release]. Retrieved from https://finlandabroad.fi/web/usa/current-affairs/-/asset_publisher/h5w4iTUJhNne/content/nordic-cooperation-in-silicon-valley/384951
• Epping, E. (2018). Science and Innovation Centers – bringing a new dimension to the internationalization of higher education, research and innovation (CHEPS Blog). Enschede.
• Epping, E. (2020). Lifting the smokescreen of science diplomacy: comparing the political instrumentation of science and innovation centres. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00599-4
• Erler, G. (2008, November 13). Rede Staatsminister Gernot Erler bei der Konferenz der FES „Wissenschaftsaußenpolitik – Deutschland als Knotenpunkt im weltweiten Wissenschaftsnetz“ [Press release]. Berlin.
• European Commission (2004). Die Schweiz richtet Wissenschaftsaußenposten in den USA und in Asien ein. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/22940/de
• Fähnrich, B. (2013). Science Diplomacy: Strategische Kommunikation in der Auswärtigen Wissenschaftspolitik. Organisationskommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Fähnrich, B. (2015). Science diplomacy: Investigating the perspective of scholars on politics-science collaboration in international affairs. Public Understanding of Science, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515616552
• Fathi, D. (2012, June 5). Eine Roadmap zur Verdoppelung des Netzwerkes Swissnex: 12.3431 Postulat. Curia Vista – Die Geschäftsdatenbank.
• FDFA (2019). Die Schweiz in der Welt 2028: Bericht der Arbeitsgruppe «Aussenpolitische Vision Schweiz 2028». Bern.
• FDFA (2021). Bundesrat ernennt Sonderbeauftragten für Science Diplomacy. Retrieved from https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/das-eda/aktuell/newsuebersicht/2021/02/science-diplomacy.html
• Fedoroff, N. V. (2009). Science Diplomacy in the 21st century. Cell, 136(1), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.030
• Ferreira, G. G. C., & Oliveira, A. J. N. S. de (2020). From Science Diplomacy to Education Diplomacy: The Brazilian Case. Conjuntura Austral, 11(54), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.100750
• Fetscherin, M., & Marmier, P. (2010). Switzerland’s nation branding initiative to foster science and technology, higher education and innovation: A case study. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2010.6
• Fischer, T., & Möckli, D. (2016). The Limits of Compensation: Swiss Neutrality Policy in the Cold War. Journal of Cold War Studies, 18(4), 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1162/JCWS_a_00678
• Fleury, A., & Zala, S. (eds.) (2012). Wissenschaft und Aussenpolitik: Beiträge zur Tagung anlässlich des 50. Jubiläums der Schaffung des ersten Postens eines schweizerischen Wissenschaftsattachés. Quaderni di Dodis: Vol. 1. Bern: Diplomatische Dokumente der Schweiz: Diplomatische Dokumente der Schweiz. Retrieved from http://www.alexandria.admin.ch/bv001490427.pdf
• Flick, U. (2011). Triangulation: Eine Einführung (3rd edn.). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; Springer Fachmedien.
• Flick, U. (2018a). Doing Qualitative Data Collection – Charting the Routes. In U. Flick (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection (34–50). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Flick, U. (Ed.) (2018b). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection. Los Angeles: Sage.
• Flink, T. (2009). Aussenwissenschaftspolitik – ein neues Handlungsfeld? Forschung, Politik - Strategie - Management, 3+4, 69–78.
• Flink, T. (2020a). The Sensationalist Discourse of Science Diplomacy: A Critical Reflection. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10032
• Flink, T. (2020b). Wissenschaftsdiplomatie in der Europäischen Union: Praktiken und Perspektiven. Forschung, Politik - Strategie - Management, 1+2(2019), 5–11.
• Flink, T., & Rüffin, N. V. (2019). The current state of the art of science diplomacy. In W. Cranzler, S. Kuhlmann, & D. Simon (eds.), Handbook on Science and Public Policy (pp. 104–121). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Flink, T., & Schreiterer, U. (2010). Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches. Science and Public Policy, 37(9), 665–677. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X12778118264530;
• Forbes, W. H. (1957). The Role of Science Attachés. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 13(8), 274–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1957.11457578
• Fromm, N., & Raev, A. (2018). Contesting Contextual Forces of National Politics—Explaining German Transnational Education from a Policy Design Perspective. European Policy Analysis, 4(2), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1042
• Fumasoli, T., Barbato, G., & Turri, M. (2020). The determinants of university strategic positioning: a reappraisal of the organisation. Higher Education, 80(2), 305–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00481-6
• Fumasoli, T., & Lepori, B. (2011). Patterns of strategies in Swiss higher education institutions. Higher Education, 61(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9330-x
• Gabriel, J. (2003). The Price of Political Uniqueness: Swiss Foreign Policy in a Changing World Pages. In J. Gabriel & T. Fischer (eds.), Swiss Foreign Policy 1945–2002 (pp. 1–22). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Gauweiler, P. (2018). Auswärtige Kulturpolitik. Die dritte Säule der Außenpolitik. In O. Zimmermann & T. Geißler (eds.), Die dritte Säule: Beiträge zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik (Politik & Kultur No. 16, pp. 101–103). Berlin,
• Gerring, J. (2004). What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? The American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.
• Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
• Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2013). Life With and Without Coding: Two Methods for Early-Stage Data Analysis in Qualitative Research Aiming at Causal Explanations. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-14.2.1886
• Gläser, J., & Velarde, K. S. (2018). Changing Funding Arrangements and the Production of Scientific Knowledge: Introduction to the Special Issue. Minerva, 56(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9344-6
• Gluckmann, P. D., Turekian, V. C., Grimes, R. W., & Kishi, T. (2017). Science Diplomacy: A Pragmatic Perspective from the Inside (Science & Diplomacy No. 6 (4)).
• Goetschel, L., Bernath, M., & Schwarz, D. (2005). Swiss Foreign Policy: Foundations and Possibilities. New York: Routledge.
• Goodman, L. A. (2011). Comment: On Respondent-Driven Sampling and Snowball Sampling in Hard-to-Reach Populations and Snowball Sampling Not in Hard-to-Reach Populations. Sociological Methodology, 41(1), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01242.x
• Goodsite, M. E., Bertelsen, R. G., Pertoldi-Bianchi, S. C., Ren, J., van der Watt, L.‑M., & Johannsson, H. (2016). The role of science diplomacy: a historical development and international legal framework of arctic research stations under conditions of climate change, post-cold war geopolitics and globalization/power transition. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(4), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0329-6
• Gottlieb, T. (2019a). Innovation Centre Denmark – São Paulo: Research, Funding and Collaboration Opportunities – with Denmark.
• Gottlieb, T. (April 2019b). Innovation Centre Denmark. Retrieved from https://www.faubai.org.br/conf/presentation2019/Centres%20for%20research%20and%20innovation%20as%20platforms%20for%20sustainable%20cooperation%20between%20Europe%20and%20Brazil.pdf
• Götz, T. (2009). Vorwort: Wissenswelten verbinden. Deutsche Außenpolitik für mehr Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung. In Auswärtiges Amt (Chair), Wissenswelten verbinden. Auftaktkonferenz zur Initiative Außenwissenschaftspolitik, Berlin.
• Government of Spain (2016). Report on Science, Technology And Innovation Diplomacy.
• Graf, L. (2013). The Hybridization of Vocational Training and Higher Education in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Opladen [u.a.]: Budrich UniPress Ltd. https://doi.org/10.3224/86388043
• Gregory, B. (2008). Public Diplomacy: Sunrise of an Academic Field. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311723
• Griessen, T., & Braun, D. (2008). The political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies in Switzerland. Science and Public Policy, 35(4), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X310338;
• Gunn, A. (2017). Policy entrepreneurs and policy formulation. In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (eds.), Handbooks of research on public policy. Handbook of Policy Formulation (pp. 265–282). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Gupta, K. (2012). Comparative Public Policy: Using the Comparative Method to Advance Our Understanding of the Policy Process. The Policy Studies Journal, 40(S1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00443.x
• Haber, E. (2012, October 27). Staatssekretärin Haber zur Eröffnung des Deutschen Wissenschafts- und Innovations-hauses in New Delhi. DWIH, Neu Delhi. Retrieved from http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2012/121028-Haber-DWIH-Delhi.html
• Habicht, M. (1953). The Special Position of Switzerland in International Affairs. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944–), 29(4), 457–463. https://doi.org/10.2307/2606004
• Haelg, L., Sewerin, S., & Schmidt, T. S. (2020). The role of actors in the policy design process: introducing design coalitions to explain policy output. Policy Sciences, 53(2), 309–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09365-z
• Hajjar, D. P. (2016, June 27). Want to ease tensions in the Middle East? Science diplomacy can help. Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/markaz/2016/06/27/want-to-ease-tensions-in-the-middle-east-science-diplomacy-can-help/
• Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms (MPIFG Discussion Paper No. 6). Cologne.
• Halpern, C. (2008). EU-policy Instruments: To What Extent are they EU-specific? Comparison and transfer of European environmental policy instruments. In Efficient and Democratic Governance in the European Union (Connex Report Series, pp. 109–118). Mannheim,
• Halpern, C. (2010). Governing Despite its Instruments? Instrumentation in EU Environmental Policy. West European Politics, 33(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903354064
• Halpern, C., Jacquot, S., & Le Galès, P. (2008). A Mainstreaming: Analysis of a Policy Instrument (New Gov Policy Brief).
• Harmsen, R., & Powell, J. J. W. (2019). Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Luxembourg. In J. C. Shin & P. Teixera (eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions (pp. 1–5). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; Imprint: Springer.
• Harmsen, R., & Tupper, A. (2017). The Governance of Post‐Secondary Education Systems in British Columbia and Ontario: Path dependence and Provincial Policy. Canadian Public Administration, 60(3).
• Harnisch, S. (2013). German Foreign Policy: Gulliver's Travails in the 21st Century. In R. K. Beasley, J. Kaarbo, J. S. Lantis, & Snarr, Michel, T. (eds.), Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective: Domestic and International Influences on State Behavior (pp. 71–93). Sage Publications.
• Harnischfeger, H. (2007). Auswärtige Kulturpolitik. In S. Schmidt, G. Hellmann, & R. Wolf (eds.), Handbuch zur deutschen Aussenpolitik (1st edn., pp. 713–723). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90250-0_56
• Hassan, M., ter Meulen, V., McGrath, P. F., & Fears, R. (2015). Academies of Science as Key Instruments of Science Diplomacy. Science & Diplomacy. (4. No. 1 (March)).
• Hassel, A. (2015). Public Policy. In J. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 569–575). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.75029-X
• Heidenheimer, A. J. (1997). Disparate ladders: Why school and university policies differ in Germany, Japan and Switzerland. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
• Heidenheimer, A. J., Heclo, H., & Teich Adams, C. (2005). The politics of social choice. In H. J. Wiarda (ed.), Critical concepts in political science. Comparative politics: Volume VI Comparative Public Policy (Vol. 6, 13–36). London: Routledge.
• Helfferich, C. (2011). Die Qualität qualitativer Daten: Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews (4th edn.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften / Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92076-4
• Hellström, T., & Jacob, M. (2017). Policy instrument affordances: a framework for analysis. Policy Studies, 38(6), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1386442
• Héritier, A. (2012). Policy Effectiveness and Transparency in European Policy-Making. In E. Jones, A. Menon, & Weatherill (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (pp. 676–689). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199546282.013.0047
• Hertig, H.‑P. (2015). UNESCO science report: towards 2030.
• Hesse, J. J. (2010). Die Internationalisierung der Wissenschaftspolitik: Nationale Wissenschaftssysteme im Vergleich. Journal for Comparative Government and European Policy, 8(1), 89–128.
• Hofmänner, A. (2018). New International Science and Technology Policies: Key Issues and Questions in Switzerland: An exploratory study conducted on ­behalf of the Swiss Science Council SSC (No. ISBN 978-3-906113-54-8). Bern.
• Hood, C. (1983). The Tools of Government.: Public Policy and Politics (1st edn.). London: Macmillan.
• Hood, C. (2007). Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20(1), 127–144.
• Hood, C., & Margetts, H. (2007). The Tools of Government in the Digital Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hoornbeek, J. A., & Peters, B. G. (2017). Understanding policy problems: a refinement of past work. Policy and Society, 36(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361631
• Hornbostel, S. (2001). Third party funding of German universities. An indicator of research activity? Scientometrics, 50(3), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010566916697
• Hotz-Hart, B. (2012). Innovation Switzerland: A Particular Kind of Excellence. In J. Bauer, A. Lang, & V. Schneider (eds.), Innovation Policy and Governance in High-Tech Industries: The Complexity of Coordination (1st edn., pp. 127–154). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-50783
• House of Switzerland (2016). Swiss Pavilion EXPO 2017: call for projects. Retrieved from https://houseofswitzerland.org/de/headlines/swiss-pavilion-expo-2017-call-projects
• Howlett, M. (1991). Policy Instruments, Policy Styles, and Policy Implementation: National Approaches to Theories of Instrument Choice. Policy Studies Journal, 19(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1991.tb01878.x
• Howlett, M. (2000). Managing the "hollow state": procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration/Administration Publique Du Canada, 43(4), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2000.tb01152.x
• Howlett, M. (2004). Beyond Good and Evil in Policy Implementation: Instrument Mixes, Implementation Styles, and Second Generation Theories of Policy Instrument Choice. Policy and Society, 23(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(04)70030-2
• Howlett, M. (2005). What is a policy instrument? Tools, mixes, and implementation styles. In F. P. Eliadis, M. M. Hill, & M. Howlett (eds.), Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance (1st edn., 31–50). Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
• Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1
• Howlett, M. (2014a). From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0
• Howlett, M. (2014b). Policy Design: What, Who, How and Why? In C. Halpern, P. Lascoumes, & P. Le Galès (eds.), L'instrumentation de l'action publique: Controverses, résistances, effets (pp. 281–315). Paris: Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques.
• Howlett, M. (2018). The criteria for effective policy design: character and context in policy instrument choice. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11(3), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2017.1412284
• Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2014). Policy Design and Non-Design: Towards a Spectrum of Policy Formulation Types. Politics and Governance, 2(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v2i2.149
• Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2017). Policy design: From tools to patches. Canadian Public Administration, 60(1), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12209
• Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2015). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: the new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy & Politics, 43(2), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1332/147084414X13992869118596
• Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1993). Patterns of Policy Instrument Choice: Policy Styles, Policy Learning and the Privatization Experience. Review of Policy Research, 12(1–2), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1993.tb00505.x
• Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems (2nd edn.). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford Univ. Press.
• Huisman, J., & van der Wende, M. (eds.) (2005). ACA papers on international cooperation in education. On cooperation and Competition II: Institutional responses to Internationalisation, Europeanisation and Globalisation. Bonn: Lemmens.
• Hüther, O., & Krücken, G. (2016). Nested Organizational Fields: Isomorphism and Differentiation among European Universities. In E. Popp Berman & C. Paradeise (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Vol. 46. The University Under Pressure (Vol. 46, pp. 53–83). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20160000046003
• Jäger, T., Höse, A., & Oppermann, K. (eds.) (2011). Deutsche Außenpolitik: Sicherheit, Wohlfahrt, Institutionen und Normen (2nd edn.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93024-4
• Jenson, J., & Nagels, N. (2018). Social Policy Instruments in Motion. Conditional Cash Transfers from Mexico to Peru. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12275
• Jones, C. M. (2010). Bureaucratic Politics and Organizational Process Models. In Oxford Research Encyclopedias (ed.). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.2
• Jones, P. L. (2015). Track two diplomacy in theory and practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Jost, H. U. (2012). Wissenschaft auf Aussenposten. Eine Einführung zur Geschichte der Wissenschaftsattachés. In A. Fleury & S. Zala (eds.), Quaderni di Dodis: Vol. 1, Wissenschaft und Aussenpolitik: Beiträge zur Tagung anlässlich des 50. Jubiläums der Schaffung des ersten Postens eines schweizerischen Wissenschaftsattachés (pp. 15–20). Bern: Diplomatische Dokumente der Schweiz.
• Kaltofen, C., & Acuto, M. (2018). Science Diplomacy: Introduction to a Boundary Problem. Global Policy, 9 (53), 8–13.
• Kaltofen, C., Acuto, M., & Blackstock, J. (eds.) (2018). Science Diplomacy [Special issue]. Global Policy, 9(53). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
• Kaplan, K. (2011). International opportunities: The science of diplomacy. Nature, 470(7334), 425–427. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7334-425a
• Kassim, H., & Le Galès, P. (2010). Exploring Governance in a Multi-Level Polity: A Policy Instruments Approach. West European Politics, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903354031
• Keenan, M., Cutler, P., Marks, J., Meylan, R., Smith, C., & Koivisto, E. (2012). Orienting international science cooperation to meet global 'grand challenges'. Science and Public Policy, 39(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs019
• Keerawella, G. (2016). Symbiosis between science and diplomacy in changing paradigm in international affairs. Retrieved from http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=154034
• Kleiber, C. (2000). Going Global and Acting Locally. In X. L. Comtesse & C. von Arb (eds.), Swiss House for Advanced Research and Education (pp. 4–5). Boston: SHARE Boston.
• Kleiber, C. (2021). “We wanted to invent a new diplomacy”: Former Swiss State Secretary Charles Kleiber reflects on 20 years of swissnex, and imagines a future Switzerland that tackles global challenges head-on. In Revealing the Dots: Eleven interviews with some of the most influential figures in swissnex’s 20-year history (4–5). Boston: Swissnex Boston.
• Kluge, S. (2000). Empirisch begründete Typenbildung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1).
• Kosmützky, A. (2016). The Precision and Rigor of International Comparative Studies in Higher Education. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (eds.), Theory and Method in Higher Education Research. Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (2nd edn., Vol. 2, pp. 199–221). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220210000007004
• Kosmützky, A. (2019). Comparative Research, Higher Education. In J. C. Shin & P. Teixera (eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions (pp. 1–8). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; Imprint: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_175-1
• Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods & techniques (2nd rev. edn.). New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd. Publishers.
• Kowner, A. (1993). Kulturförderung in der Schweiz. In R. Strachwitz & S. Toepler (eds.), Kulturförderung: Mehr als Sponsoring (pp. 111–119). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85836-8_11
• Kristensen, G. K., & Ravn, M. N. (2015). The voices heard and the voices silenced: recruitment processes in qualitative interview studies. Qualitative Research, 15(6), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114567496
• Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the University into an Organizational Actor. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (eds.), Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change (pp. 241–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kuckartz, U. (2006). Zwischen Singularität und Allgemeingültigkeit: Typenbildung als qualitative Strategie der Verallgemeinerung. In K.-S. Rehberg (ed.), Soziale Ungleichheit, kulturelle Unterschiede: Verhandlungen des 32. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in München. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
• Kuhlmann, S. (2008). Forschungs- und Innovationssysteme im internationalen Wettbewerb. In G. Schütte (ed.), Wettlauf ums Wissen: Außenwirtschaftspolitik im Zeitalter der Wissensrevolution (1st edn., pp. 52–58). Berlin: Berlin Univ. Press.
• Kuhlmann, S., & Rip, A. (2018). Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy011
• Kwiek, M. (2021). The Globalization of Science: The Increasing Power of Individual Scientists. In P. Mattei, X. Dumay, E. Mangez, & J. Behrend (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Education and Globalization (pp. 1–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd edn.). Radical thinkers. London, New York: Verso.
• Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2004). Gouverner par les instruments (1st edn.). Sciences Po Gouvernance. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
• Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments—From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20(1), 1–21.
• Lascoumes, P., & Simard, L. (2011). Public Policy Seen Through the Prism of its Instruments: Introduction. Revue Française De Science Politique (English Edition), 61(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfspe.611.0001
• Le Galès, P. (2011). Policy Instruments and Governance. In M. Bevir (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Governance (pp. 142–159). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Le Galès, P. (2016). Performance measurement as a policy instrument. Policy Studies, 37(6), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2016.1213803
• Leese, M. (2018). Between a Carrot and a Stick: Science Diplomacy and Access to EU Research Funding. Global Policy, 9(2), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12546
• Legrand, T., & Stone, D. (2018). Science diplomacy and transnational governance impact. British Politics, 13(3), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-018-0082-z
• Leijten, J. (2017). Exploring the future of innovation diplomacy. European Journal of Futures Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-017-0122-8
• Lepori, B. (2008). Research in non-university higher education institutions. The case of the Swiss Universities of Applied Sciences. Higher Education, 56(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9088-y
• Lepori, B., & Fumasoli, T. (2010). Reshaping the Swiss Higher Education System: Governance Reforms and Fields Reconfigurations. Swiss Political Science Review, 16(4), 811–814.
• Lepori, B., Huisman, J., & Seeber, M. (2014). Convergence and differentiation processes in Swiss higher education: an empirical analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.647765
• Lepori, B., Seeber, M., & Bonaccorsi, A. (2015). Competition for talent. Country and organizational-level effects in the internationalization of European higher education institutions. Research Policy, 44(3), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.004
• Lequesne, C. (2020). Ministries of Foreign Affairs: A Crucial Institution Revisited. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10003
• Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1989). Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9(1), 35–58.
• Loftness, R. L. (1955). Why Science Attaches? The Scientific Monthly, 80(2), 124–127.
• Lombard, T. (2021). "The idea was to build bridges between science and business”. In Revealing the Dots: Eleven interviews with some of the most influential figures in swissnex’s 20-year history (pp. 16–18). Boston: Swissnex Boston.
• Lombard, T., & Odier, P. (2000). Building a Bridge. In X. L. Comtesse & C. von Arb (eds.), Swiss House for Advanced Research and Education (pp. 6–7). Boston: SHARE Boston.
• Lombard Odier (2011). Collaboration and Partnerships: the ‘swissnex’ Case. Geneva.
• Long, T. (2017). It’s not the size, it’s the relationship: from ‘small states’ to asymmetry. International Politics, 54(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0028-x
• Lord, K. M., & Turekian, V. C. (2007). Science and Society. Time for a New Era of Science Diplomacy. Science, 315(5813), 769–770. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139880
• Lord, K. M., & Turekian, V. C. (2009, May 5). The Science of Diplomacy. Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-science-of-diplomacy/
• Lubell, M. (2003). Collaborative Institutions, Belief-Systems, and Perceived Policy Effectiveness. Political Research Quarterly, 56(3), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600306
• Maasen, S., & Weingart, P. (eds.) (2005a). Sociology of the sciences: v. 24. Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making. Dordrecht, London: Springer. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/gb/ BLDSS
• Maasen, S., & Weingart, P. (2005b). What's New in Scientific Advice to Politics? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making. In S. Maasen & P. Weingart (eds.), Sociology of the sciences: v. 24. Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making (pp. 1–19). Dordrecht, London: Springer.
• Maaß, K.‑J. (2011). Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Auswärtigen Kulturpolitik. In T. Jäger, A. Höse, & K. Oppermann (eds.), Deutsche Außenpolitik: Sicherheit, Wohlfahrt, Institutionen und Normen (2nd edn., pp. 584–602). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
• Maaß, K.‑J. (2013). Werbung, Werte, Wettbewerb – wohin steuert die Auswärtige Kulturpolitik? Stuttgart.
• Maaß, K.‑J. (2015). Das deutsche Modell – Die Mittlerorganisationen. In K.-J. Maaß (ed.), Kultur und Außenpolitik: Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis (3rd edn., pp. 263–277). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
• Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (eds.) (2009). Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806414.003
• Mai, M. (2016). Regieren in der modernen Gesellschaft: Governance aus der Sicht der Ministerialbürokratie. Opladen [u.a.]: Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84740518
• Mansell, R. (2018). Science diplomacy and internet governance. In M. Marzouki & A. Calderaro (eds.), Global Internet Governance as a Diplomacy Issue. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham.
• Marmier, P. (2021). “We were seeding relationships that very often grew into successful partnerships”. In Revealing the Dots: Eleven interviews with some of the most influential figures in swissnex’s 20-year history (pp. 28–31). Boston: Swissnex Boston.
• Marmier, P., & Fetscherin, M. (2010). Case E: A Public–Private Partnership to Foster Science, Higher Education and Innovation – The Case of Switzerland with swissnex Boston. In F. Go & R. Govers (eds.), International Place Branding Yearbook 2010: Place Branding in the New Age of Innovation (pp. 97–109). Palgrave Macmillan London.
• Marques, M. (2018). Research Governance through public funding instruments: institutional change of educational research in the European Union and England 1984–2014 (Dissertation). University of Luxembourg.
• Marsh, D., & McConnell, A. (Eds.) (2008). Towards a Framework for Examining Policy Success.
• Max Dohner (2019, April 28). Hans Peter Hertig – Er bündelt dort, wo die Wege sich gabeln. St.Galler Tagblatt AG. Retrieved from https://www.tagblatt.ch/kultur/buch-buehne-kunst/er-bundelt-dort-wo-die-wege-sich-gabeln-ld.1359501
• Mayntz, R. (1996). Politik und Wissenschaft – ein Spannungsverhältnis. Retrieved from Spektrum der Wissenschaft Verlagsgesellschaft mbH website: https://www.spektrum.de/magazin/politik-und-wissenschaft-ein-spannungsverhaeltnis/823031
• Mayntz, R., & Scharpf, F. W. (1995). Der Ansatz des akteurszentrierten Institutionalismus. In R. Mayntz & F. W. Scharpf (eds.), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung (pp. 39–72). Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.
• Melchor, L. (2020). What Is a Science Diplomat? The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10026
• Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. In J. Melissen (ed.), Studies in diplomacy. The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations (pp. 3–27). Houndmills Basingstoke Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Menon, A., & Sedelmeier, U. (2010). Instruments and Intentionality: Civilian Crisis Management and Enlargement Conditionality in EU Security Policy. West European Politics, 33(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903354106
• Merton, R. K. (1974). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
• Mey, G., & Mruck, K. (2007). Qualitative Interviews. In G. Naderer & E. Balzer (eds.), Qualitative Marktforschung in Theorie und Praxis: Grundlagen, Methoden und Anwendungen (pp. 247–278). Wiesbaden: Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler / GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9262-8_13
• Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World Society and the Nation‐State. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181. https://doi.org/10.1086/231174
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
• Milkoreit, M. (2015). Science and Climate Change Diplomacy: Cognitive Limits and the Need to Reinvent Science Communication. In L. S. Davis & R. G. Patman (eds.), Science Diplomacy: New Day Or False Dawn? (pp. 109–131). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs Denmark (2021). Innovation Centre Denmark Tel Aviv: Advisory Board. Retrieved from https://israel.um.dk/en/innovation-centre/advisory-board-ii
• European Commission (01.06.15). The EU approach to science diplomacy [Press release]. Washington. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/2014-2019/moedas/announcements/eu-approach-science-diplomacy_en
• Moedas, C. (2016). Science Diplomacy in the European Union. Science & Diplomacy. (March). Retrieved from http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/perspective/2016/science-diplomacy-in-european-union
• Morgan, L. (2010, March 3). Letter to Mrs Maria Vamvakinou MP. Letter. Canberra.
• Moro-Martín, A. (2017). How dare you call us diplomats. Nature, 543(7645), 289. https://doi.org/10.1038/543289a
• Mosch, K. (2009). Deutsche Wissenschafts- und Innovationshäuser: Was das Goethe-Institut für die Kultur ist, sollen die DWIH für die Wissenschaft werden. Wissenschaftsmanagement. Zeitschrift Für Innovation, 15(6), 4–5.
• Moses, J. W., & Knutsen, T. (2001). Inside Out: Globalization and the Reorganization of Foreign Affairs Ministries. Cooperation and Conflict, 36(4), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/00108360121962506
• Mukherjee, I., & Bali, A. S. (2019). Policy effectiveness and capacity: two sides of the design coin. Policy Design and Practice, 2(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1632616
• Mukherjee, J. (2022, March 5). A price to pay: What science diplomacy means in wartime. Retrieved from https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20220304085448544
• Netzwerk Future (2019). Förderung von Bildung, Forschung und Innovation in den Jahren 2021-2024: Gemeinsames Positionspapier der Schweizer Hochschulen und der Institutionen der Forschungs- und Innovationsförderung. Bern.
• Newman, P. (2009). Methods for analyzing policy tools: the case of new planning instruments in the UK. Planum — the European Journal of Planning Online, 1–7.
• Nordic Innovation House (2021, August 13). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.nordicinnovationhouse.com/#about-nih
• Nye, J. S. (1990). Soft Power. Foreign Policy, 80, 153–171.
• Nye, J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699
• Ostrowski, D. (2010). Die Public Diplomacy der deutschen Auslandsvertretungen weltweit: Theorie und Praxis der deutschen Auslandsöffentlichkeitsarbeit (1st edn.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92263-8_3
• Oxford Research A/S (2015). Evaluation of the Danish Innovation Centres: For the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark and the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science.
• Oxford Research A/S (2020). Evaluation of the swissnex Network: Evaluation report by Oxford Research for the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI). Denmark.
• Özkaragöz Dogan, E. (2015). Science Diplomacy in the Global Age: Examples from Turkey and the World. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
• Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. (2012). The Problem of Emergence. In J. F. Padgett & W. W. Powell (eds.), The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (pp. 1–29). Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
• Pasternack, P., Maue, I., Hechler, D., Kolasinski, T., & Schulze, H. (2016). Die BFI-Policy-Arena in der Schweiz: Akteurskonstellation in der Bildungs-, Forschungs- und Innovationspolitik (1st edn.). Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung Halle-Wittenberg. Berlin: BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.
• Peters, B. G. (2005). The Problem of Policy Problems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 7(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980500319204
• Peters, B. G., Capano, G., Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., Chou, M.‑H., & Ravinet, P. (2018). Designing for Policy Effectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108555081
• Peters, B. G., & van Nispen, F. K. M. (eds.) (1998). New horizons in public policy. Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Association, 94(2), 251–267.
• Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, N.J., Oxford: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://swb.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=768545
• Powell, J. J. W. (2018). Higher Education and the Exponential Rise of Science: Competition and Collaboration. In R. A. Scott, M. Buchmann, & S. M. Kosslyn (eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable resource (pp. 1–17). New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772
• Powell, J. J. W. (2020). Comparative education in an age of competition and collaboration. Comparative Education, 56(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2019.1701248
• Powell, J. J. W., Baker, D., & Fernandez, F. (eds.) (2017). International perspectives on education and society: Vol. 33. The Century of Science: The Global Triumph of the Research University (1st edn.). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183–203). Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
• Powell, W. W., & Soppe, B. (2015). Boundaries and New Organization Forms. In J. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 768–772). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.73050-9
• Quevedo, F. (2013). The Importance of International Research Institutions for Science Diplomacy. Science & Diplomacy. (Vol. 2, No. 3 (September)).
• Raev, A. (2020). Transnationale Bildung im Wandel: Grenzüberschreitende Hochschulbildung ‚made in Germany‘ (1990–2016). Kultur und Außenpolitik: Vol. 1. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748920960
• Raev, A., & Minkman, E. (2020). Emotional policies: Introducing branding as a tool for science diplomacy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00617-5
• Rapley, T., & Rees, G. (2018). Collecting Documents as Data. In U. Flick (ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 548–565). Los Angeles: Sage.
• Ravinet, P. (2011). European Coordination alla bolognese.: Notes on the Instrumentation of the European Higher Education Area. Revue Française De Science Politique (English Edition), 61(1), 19–42.
• Reale, E., & Seeber, M. (2011). The transformation of steering and governance in Higher Education: funding and evaluation as policy instruments (Working Paper CNR-CERIS No. 2).
• Rist, R. C. (1998). Choosing the Right Policy Instrument at the Right Time: The Contextual Challenges of Selection and Implementation. In M. L. Bemelmans-Videc, R. C. Rist, & E. Vedung (eds.), Comparative policy analysis series. Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments and their Evaluation (pp. 156–171). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
• Rittmeyer, F., & Forster, N. (2013). High-Tech-Diplomat, übernehmen Sie! In Wissenschaftsdiplomatie: Die Schweiz vernetzt sich neu (Dossier: «Wissenschaftsdiplomatie» Ausgabe 1003, pp. 64–67).
• Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1991). Policy Entrepreneurs: Their Activity Structure and Function in the Policy Process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 1(2), 147–175. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1181732
• Roulston, K., & Choi, M. (2018). Qualitative Interviews. In U. Flick (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection (pp. 349–372). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• The Royal Society, & AAAS (2010). New frontiers in science diplomacy: Navigating the changing balance of power. London.
• Rüffin, N. V. (2018). Case Study Science and Innovation Diplomacy Agencies at the nexus of research, economics, and politics (Working Paper No. 2018/10). Berlin.
• Rüffin, N. V., & Schreiterer, U. (2017a). Case Study Science and technology agreements in the toolbox of science diplomacy: Effective instruments or insignificant add-ons? (EL-CSID Working Papers No. 6). Brussels.
• Rüffin, N. V., & Schreiterer, U. (2017b). Emerging Practices of Diplomacy for Science in Europe: Tensions and Potentials? Panel T05P06 Session 2 Challenges in Global Policy Making: The ‘Practice Turn’ in the New Diplomacy. Singapore.
• Ruffini, P.‑B. (2017). Science and diplomacy: A New Dimension of International Relations. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
• Ruffini, P.‑B. (2018). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Science-Diplomacy Nexus. Global Policy, 9 (53), 73–77.
• Ruffini, P.‑B. (2020a). Collaboration and Competition: The Twofold Logic of Science Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10028
• Ruffini, P.‑B. (2020b). Conceptualizing science diplomacy in the practitioner-driven literature: a critical review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00609-5
• Rungius, C. (2020). SESAME – a synchrotron light source in the Middle East: an international research infrastructure in the making. In M. Young, T. Flink, & E. Dall (eds.), Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project.
• Rungius, C., & Flink, T. (2020). Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00585-w
• Sabzalieva, E., Sá, C. M., Martinez, M., & Kachynska, N. (2021). Science Diplomacy Policy Processes in Comparative Perspective: The Use of Scientific Cooperation Agreements in Canada, India, Norway, and the UK. Minerva. (59), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09429-y
• Salamon, L. M. (2000). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance and the Tools of Public Policy Action: An Introduction. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28(5).
• Sartori, G. (1960). Der Begriff der "Wertefreiheit" in der politischen Wissenschaft. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 1(1), 12–22.
• Saurugger, S. (2014). The Changing Nature of Instruments: Why and how instruments of participation change in the European Union. In C. Halpern, P. Lascoumes, & P. Le Galès (eds.), L'instrumentation de l'action publique: Controverses, résistances, effets (pp. 317–341). Paris: Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques.
• SBF (2006). Jahresbericht 2006 über die Schweizer Häuser für wissenschaftlichen und technologischen Austausch. Bern.
• Schaffer, F. C. (2006). Ordinary Language Interviewing. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk, NY u. a.: M. E. Sharpe.
• Schaper, R. (2016, April 8). Frank-Walter Steinmeier: „Man muss das Gespräch vor Ort suchen“: Außenminister zur Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik. Der Tagesspiegel. Retrieved from https://www.tagesspiegel.de/kultur/aussenminister-zur-auswaertigen-kultur-und-bildungspolitik-frank-walter-steinmeier-man-muss-das-gespraech-vor-ort-suchen/13423998.html
• Schavan, A. (2010, February 19). Rede der Bundesministerin für Bildung und Forschung, Prof. Dr. Annette Schavan, MdB, anlässlich der Eröffnung des Deutschen Wissenschafts- und Innovationshauses, New York. Retrieved from http://www.annette-schavan.de/reden/mr20100219.pdf
• Schlegel, F., Jacot, O., & Fetscherin, M. (2011). Science diplomacy with swissnex China: A Swiss nation brand initiative. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 7(4), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2011.14
• Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools. The Journal of Politics, 52(2), 510–529.
• Schneider, G., Schiller, J., & Goethe, J. W. (2000). Goethe ist nicht überall. Eine empirische Analyse der Standortentscheidungen in der Auswärtigen Kulturpolitik. Zeitschrift Für Internationale Beziehungen, 7(1), 5–32.
• Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis. In U. Flick (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 170–183). Los Angeles: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n12
• Schultes, N. (2011). Deutsche Außenwirtschaftsförderung. In T. Jäger, A. Höse, & K. Oppermann (eds.), Deutsche Außenpolitik: Sicherheit, Wohlfahrt, Institutionen und Normen (2nd edn., pp. 349–369). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
• Schütte, G. (2006, April 12). Diplomatie der Forscher: Wenn Deutschland international mithalten will, braucht es eine Außenwissenschaftspolitik. Ein Plädoyer. Die Zeit.
• Schütte, G. (2007). Resümee: Außenwissenschaftspolitik – Wissenschaftsaußenpolitik: eine Querschnittsperspektive internationaler Politikgestaltung in modernen Wissensgesellschaften. In Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik & Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung (eds.), Außenwissenschaftspolitik-Wissenschaftsaußenpolitik: Arbeits- und Diskussionspapier 7/2007 (pp. 28–39). Bonn,
• Schütte, G. (ed.) (2008). Wettlauf ums Wissen: Außenwirtschaftspolitik im Zeitalter der Wissensrevolution (1. Aufl.). Berlin: Berlin Univ. Press.
• Schütte, G. (2009). Innovativ, sichtbar, glaubwürdig – Repräsentanzen der deutschen Wissenschaft im Ausland. In A. Borgwardt (ed.), Wissenschaftsaußenpolitik: Deutschland als Knotenpunkt im weltweiten Wissensnetzwerk; Konferenzbericht der Veranstaltung vom 13. November 2008 Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (1st edn., pp. 14–19). Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
• Schütte, G. (2010). Außenwissenschaftspolitik – Wissenschaft im globalen Wandel gestalten. In D. Simon, A. Knie, & S. Hornbostel (eds.), Handbuch Wissenschaftspolitik (pp. 151–161). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91993-5_11
• Schütte, G. (2022, March 31). Eiszeit für die Wissenschaft. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Retrieved from https://zeitung.faz.net/faz/politik/2022-03-31/e3d23c4a67bfaa46420d292ae6e188ce/?GEPC=s3
• Schweizer Bundesrat (2002, November 29). 02.089 Botschaft über die Förderung von Bildung, Forschung und Technologie in den Jahren 2004–2007 (No. 2002–1417). Bern.
• Schweizer Bundesrat (2007, January 24). 07.012 Botschaft über die Förderung von Bildung, Forschung und Innovation in den Jahren 2008–2011 (No. 2006-1630). Bern.
• Schweizer Bundesrat (2010, December 3). 10.109 Botschaft über die Förderung von Bildung, Forschung und Innovation im Jahr 2012. Bern.
• Schweizer Bundesrat (2012, February 22). 12.033 Botschaft über die Förderung von Bildung, Forschung und Innovation in den Jahren 2013–2016. Bern.
• Schweizer Bundesrat (2016, February 24). 16.025 Botschaft zur Förderung von Bildung, Forschung und Innovation in den Jahren 2017–2020 (No. 2015-2540). Bern.
• Schweizer Bundesrat (2018). Internationale Strategie der Schweiz im Bereich Bildung, Forschung und Innovation: Strategie des Bundesrates. Bern.
• Schweizer Bundesrat (2020a). Botschaft zur Förderung der Kultur in den Jahren 2021–2024: (Kulturbotschaft 2021-2024). Bern.
• Schweizer Bundesrat (2020b, February 26). 20.028 Botschaft Botschaft über die Förderung von Bildung, Forschung und Innovation in den Jahren 2021–2024. Bern.
• Schweizer Eidgenossenschaft (2010). Internationale Strategie der Schweiz im Bereich Bildung, Forschung und Innovation. Bern.
• Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations (2nd edn.). Foundations for organizational science. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd edn.). Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage Publications.
• Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
• Seeber, M. (2014). ERAWATCH Country Reports 2013: Switzerland (EUR – Scientific and Technical Research series No. EUR 26770 EN). Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2791/10268
• Sending, O. J., Pouliot, V., & Neumann, I. B. (2011). The future of diplomacy: Changing practices, evolving relationships. International Journal. (66 (3)), 527–542.
• SERI (2015a). Eine Roadmap für die Weiterentwicklung des swissnex Netzwerkes: Bilanz, Perspektiven und Leitlinien. Bern: Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation.
• SERI (2015b). Staatsrechnung – swissnex Netzwerk. Bern. Retrieved from SBFI website: http://annualreport.swissnex.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Financial-Statement_Jahresbericht_2016_D.pdf
• SERI (2016). swissnex Annual Report 2015. Bern. Retrieved from SERI website: http://annualreport15.swissnex.org/
• SERI (2017). swissnex Netzwerk: Jahresbericht 2016 – Highlights. Bern.
• SERI (2020). Bildung, Forschung und Innovation in der Schweiz: Chronologie. Bern.
• SHARE Boston (2000). Swiss House for Advanced Research and Education. Boston.
• Simm, C. (2021). The only constant at swissnex is change. In Revealing the Dots: Eleven interviews with some of the most influential figures in swissnex’s 20-year history (pp. 35–38). Boston: Swissnex Boston.
• Simon, D. [Dagmar], & Knie, A. (2010). Stabilität und Wandel des deutschen Wissenschaftssystems. In D. Simon, A. Knie, & S. Hornbostel (eds.), Handbuch Wissenschaftspolitik (pp. 26–33). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• SIN (2018). Science & Innovation Network (SIN). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/604011/SIN_Strategy_Mar_2017.docx
• Singer, O. (2003). Auswärtige Kulturpolitik in der Bundesrepublik: Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und institutionelle Entwicklung seit 1945 (No. WF X – 095/03).
• Skodvin, T. (1994). Structure and Agent in Leadership Diplomacy: Institutional design and leadership performance in the science-politics interface of climate change (1994:14).
• Skolnikoff, E. B. (2001). The political role of scientific cooperation. Technology in Society, 23(3), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00026-4
• Smelser, N. J. (2003). On Comparative Analysis, Interdisciplinarity and Internationalization in Sociology. International Sociology, 18(4), 643–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580903184001
• Smith III, F. L. (2014). Advancing science diplomacy: Indonesia and the US Naval Medical Research Unit. Social Studies of Science, 44(6), 825–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714535864
• Soss, J. (2006). Talking our way to meaningful explanations. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk, NY u. a.: M. E. Sharpe.
• Srugies, A. (2016). Competition or Cooperation? A comparative analysis of the public diplomacy of the European Union and selected member states (Dissertation). Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau.
• Stein, J. A. (2002). Globalisation, science, technology and policy. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), 402–408.
• Steinmeier, F.‑W. (2008a). Partner gewinnen und Potenziale nutzen – Warum sich Außenpolitik für die Wissenschaft einsetzt. In G. Schütte (ed.), Wettlauf ums Wissen: Außenwirtschaftspolitik im Zeitalter der Wissensrevolution (1st edn., pp. 28–30). Berlin: Berlin Univ. Press.
• Steinmeier, F.-W. (2008b, February 13). Rede vor dem Ausschuss für Kultur und Medien des Deutschen Bundestags [Press release]. Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2008/080213-SteinmeierKulturausschuss.html
• Steinmeier, F.-W. (2009, January 19). Rede zur Eröffnung der Auftaktkonferenz zur Initiative Außenwissenschaftspolitik [Press release]. Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/sid_6176B0B6F3F1114753AE1DD9BA614C37/DE/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2009/090119-BM-AWP.html
• Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, & Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung (2007). Außenwissenschaftspolitik-Wissenschaftsaußenpolitik: Arbeits- und Diskussionspapier 7/2007. Bonn.
• Stoll, M. (2018, April 15). Der Bund setzt auf Discount-Diplomaten: Wissenschaftsräte repräsentieren den Forschungsplatz Schweiz im Ausland – zu Kassierinnen-Löhnen. SonntagsZeitung, p. 10.
• Strasser, B. J. (2009). The Coproduction of Neutral Science and Neutral State in Cold War Europe: Switzerland and International Scientific Cooperation, 1951–69. Osiris, 24(1), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/605974
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (eds.), Beyond continuity: institutional change in advanced political economies (1–39). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
• Stucke, A. (2010). Staatliche Akteure in der Wissenschaftspolitik. In D. Simon, A. Knie, & S. Hornbostel (eds.), Handbuch Wissenschaftspolitik (pp. 363–376). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
• Swire, H. (2014, December 15). The UK, Brazil and Science Diplomacy [Press release]. Harwell Science Park. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-uk-brazil-and-science-diplomacy
• Swiss Federal Audit Office (2016, April 26). Wirtschaftlichkeitsprüfung des Aussennetzes für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation (Swissnex): Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation (EFK-15312). Bern.
• Swissinfo.ch (2000). Swiss House in Cambridge eingeweiht. Retrieved from https://www.swissinfo.ch/ger/swiss-house-in-cambridge-eingeweiht/1699438
• Swissinfo.ch (2001). Swiss House wins Massachusetts award. Retrieved from https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-house-wins-massachusetts-award/2318922
• Swissinfo.ch (2015, June 26). Swissnex to close Singapore office [Press release]. swissinfo.ch. Retrieved from https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/research-promotion_swissnex-to-close-singapore-office/41515588
• Swissnex (2016). ERI Network: Learn more about the swissnex network, its outposts, and the role of science and technology counsellors. Retrieved from https://www.swissnex.org/about/erinetwork/
• Swissnex (2017). Brief history of the swissnex Network: Formation and development of the Swiss science attachés network. Retrieved from https://www.swissnex.org/about/history/
• Swissnex (2019). Our Mission. Retrieved from https://www.swissnex.org/about/mission/
• Swissnex (2021a). Annual Report: We are Swissnex. Retrieved from https://annualreport.swissnex.org/
• Swissnex (2021b). Governance: Organization and structure. Retrieved from https://swissnex.org/about-us/governance
• Swissnex (2021c, April 13). Our mission – Swissnex. Retrieved from https://swissnex.org/about-us/mission
• Swissnex (2021d, August 2). Coming soon: Consulate of Switzerland in Osaka & 6th Swissnex location! Retrieved from https://swissnex.org/news/new-swissnex-location-japan
• Swissnex Boston and New York (2010, March 3). Ruth Dreifuss on swissnex Boston [Youtube]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4C6K0AdNFc
• Swissnex in Boston and New York (2022). Our Team – Swissnex in Boston and New York. Retrieved from https://swissnex.org/boston/about-us/our-team/
• ThinkSwiss (2010). The Swissnex Role Model: How Philanthropists and Government Worked Together for Switzerland.
• Thorhallsson, B., & Bailes, A. J. (2016). Small State Diplomacy. In C. M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, & P. Sharp (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy (294–307). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Turchetti, S. (2020). The (Science Diplomacy) Origins of the Cold War. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 50(4), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2020.50.4.411
• Turekian, V. C. (2018). The Evolution of Science Diplomacy. Global Policy, 9 (53), 5–7.
• Turekian, V. C., Macindoe, S., Copeland, D., Davis, L. S., Patman, R. G., & Pozza, M. (2015). The Emergence of Science Diplomacy. In L. S. Davis & R. G. Patman (eds.), Science Diplomacy: New Day Or False Dawn? (pp. 3–24). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
• Turekian, V. C., & Neureiter, N. (2012). Science and Diplomacy: The Past as Prologue. Science & Diplomacy, 1(1).
• Turekian, V. C., & Wang, T. C. (eds.) (2012). National Approaches to Science Diplomacy: An Education Resource [Special issue]. Science & Diplomacy. (March).
• UK Science & Innovation Network (2015). UK Science & Innovation Network Report.
• Ulnicane, I. (2021). Self-Organisation and Steering in International Research Collaborations. In K. Kastenhofer & S. Molyneux-Hodgson (eds.), Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook: volume 31. Community and identity in contemporary technosciences (Vol. 31, pp. 107–125). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8_5
• UNESCO (2021). SESAME. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/themes/science-sustainable-future/sesame#story
• Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9123-7
• Van den Besselaar, P., Hemlin, S., & van der Weijden, I. (2012). Collaboration and Competition in Research. Higher Education Policy, 25(3), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.16
• Van der Wende, M. C. (2001). Internationalisation policies: About new trends and contrasting paradigms. Higher Education Policy, 14(3), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(01)00018-6
• Van Langenhove, L. (2016). Global Science Diplomacy as a New Tool for Global Governance. Retrieved from https://media.wix.com/ugd/0bc3be_8d3a721735e84a1e8f40c6f949c7132d.pdf
• Van Langenhove, L. (2017). Tools for an EU Science Diplomacy. Brussels. https://doi.org/10.2777/911223
• Van Vught, F., & de Boer, H. (2015). Governance Models and Policy Instruments. In J. Huisman, H. de Boer, D. D. Dill, & M. Souto Otero (eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance (pp. 38–56). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45617-5_3
• Vlaamse Regering (2020). Science & Technology Offices Roadmap voorinternationale valorisatie van Vlaamse innovatie – Vlaanderen wereldwijd sterker op de kaart als innovatieve technologiegedreven regio. (No. VR 2020 1707 MED.0259/1BIS).
• Vogel, D., & Funck, B. J. (2018). Immer nur die zweitbeste Lösung? Protokolle als Dokumentationsmethode für qualitative Interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(1).
• Von Arb, C. (2004). SHARE – Diplomatie im Zeichen der Wissenschaft: Menschen verbinden, Innovationen fördern (BIOforum No. 7–8). Darmstadt.
• Von Arb, C. (2021). “Something new and different could emerge”. In Revealing the Dots: Eleven interviews with some of the most influential figures in swissnex’s 20-year history (pp. 25–27). Boston: Swissnex Boston.
• Wagner, C. S. (2002). Science and foreign policy: The elusive partnership: science and foreign policy. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), 409–417.
• Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network Structure, Self-organization, and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002
• Waldvogel, M., & Huang, J. (1999). Swiss House: The physical/virtual consulate of Switzerland.
• Wanat, C. L. (2008). Getting Past the Gatekeepers: Differences Between Access and Cooperation in Public School Research. Field Methods, 20(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X07313811
• Wang, J. (2006). Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.12.001
• Wang, T. C. (2013, June 27). The Evolution and Future of Science Diplomacy: A US Perspective, University of Tokyo. Retrieved from http://www3.grips.ac.jp/~gist/en/events/document/gistseminar_50.pdf
• Weigel, S. (2019). Transnationale Auswärtige Kulturpolitik – Jenseits der Nationalkultur: Voraussetzungen und Perspektiven der Verschränkung von Innen und Außen (ifa-Edition Kultur und Außenpolitik). Stuttgart: Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen.
• Weingart, P. (2018). Foreword. In New International Science and Technology Policies: Key Issues and Questions in Switzerland: An exploratory study conducted on behalf of the Swiss Science Council SSC (ISBN 978-3-906113-54-8, pp. 10–13). Bern: Swiss Science Council SSC.
• Weiss, C. (2005). Science, technology and international relations. Technology in Society, 27(3), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.004
• Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.
• Westerwelle, G. (2012a, February 14). Eröffnung des Deutschen Wissenschafts- und Innovationshauses São Paulo. DWIH São Paulo, São Paulo. Retrieved from http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2012/120214_BM_DWIZ.html?nn=608946
• Westerwelle, G. (2012b, November 13). Rede zur Eröffnung des Deutschen Wissenschaftszentrums in Kairo, Cairo. Retrieved from http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2012/121113-BM-DWZ-Kairo.html
• Whitley, R. (2008). Universities as strategic actors: limitations and variations. In L. Engwall & D. L. Weaire (eds.), Wenner-Gren international series: v. 84. The University in the Market: Proceedings from a symposium held in Stockholm, 1–3 November 2007. London: Portland Press.
• WIPO (2021). Global Innovation Index 2021: Tracking Innovation through the COVID-19 Crisis. Geneva.
• Witjes, N., & Sigl, L. (2015). Internationalization of STI. In A. Franzmann, A. Jansen, & P. Münte (eds.), Legitimizing Science: National and Global Public (1800–2010) (1st edn.). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
• Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science (New York, N.Y.), 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd edn.). Applied social research methods series: v. 5. Thousand Oaks, Calif., London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Zapp, M. (2022). Revisiting the Global Knowledge Economy: The Worldwide Expansion of Research and Development Personnel, 1980–2015. Minerva, 60, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09455-4
• Zito, A. R. (2018). Instrument constituencies and epistemic community theory. Policy and Society, 37(1), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1416929