Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’

Danijela Vrbljanac

doi:10.5771/1435-439X-2018-2-165

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- 143–144 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 143–144
- 145–164 Die Verflechtungsfalle des Europawahlrechts: Nationale Ratifikationen des geänderten EU-Direktwahlakts mit obligatorischer Sperrklausel und ihre rechtlichen Hürden Thomas Giegerich Thomas Giegerich 145–164
- 165–180 Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’ Danijela Vrbljanac Danijela Vrbljanac 165–180
- 181–216 Sterben dürfen und sterben lassen? Die Herrschaft über den eigenen Tod im Lichte der EMRK, des deutschen Rechts und des Unionsrechts Laura Katharina Woll Laura Katharina Woll 181–216
- 217–236 The Role of Trade Defence Instruments in EU Trade Agreements: Theory versus Practice Pieter Van Vaerenbergh Pieter Van Vaerenbergh 217–236
- 237–268 Von Demokratie und Freihandel: Die parlamentarischen Beteiligungsrechte am Abschluss von EU-Freihandelsabkommen im Mehrebenensystem David Preßlein David Preßlein 237–268
- 269–287 Gegenwärtige Effektivitätshindernisse der Kartellrechtsdurchsetzung durch die rechtliche Ausgestaltung der Kronzeugenregelungen im unionalen und deutschen Kartellrecht Maximilian Kaul Maximilian Kaul 269–287
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY Access

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien , page 165 - 180

Jurisdiction for Online Personality Rights Violations after the judgment ‘Bolagsupplysningen’

Autoren

Danijela Vrbljanac

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2018-2-165
- ISSN: 1435-439X
- ISSN online: 2942-3589
Abstract

This paper analyses the Brussels I bis rule on establishing special jurisdiction for violations of the personality rights on the internet in the light of the recent CJEU’s judgment in Bolagsupplysningen. The existing CJEU’s case law on determining jurisdiction in cases on personality rights established a principle according to which the injured party may commence the proceedings for the entire damage sustained before courts of the Member State in which the publisher’s establishment is and the courts of the Member State in which the injured party’s centre of interest is located. He or she can also sue before courts of every Member State in which the violating content is accessible but only for the portion of damage sustained in that Member State. However, Bolagsupplysningen limited these jurisdictional options. The paper focuses on jurisdictional grounds of injured party’s centre of interest and accessibility criterion underlying the mosaic principle which have been tackled with these new developments.
Share