Die Europäische Union und die Arktis. Status quo und Handlungsperspektiven

Tobias Etzold; Stefan Steinicke

doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2015-3-7

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1–35 DIE ARKTIS: REGIONALE KOOPERATION ODER KONFLIKT? 1–35
  - 1–6 Die Mär vom Kalten Krieg. Wie geopolitische Paradigmen in den internationalen Beziehungen im Arktisraum (re)produziert werden Sebastian Knecht Sebastian Knecht 1–6
  - 7–11 Die Europäische Union und die Arktis. Status quo und Handlungsperspektiven Tobias Etzold, Stefan Steinicke Tobias Etzold, Stefan Steinicke 7–11
  - 12–18 Die Zukunft arktischer Öl- und Gasressourcen – internationale Einflussfaktoren arktischer Energieressourcenentwicklung Kathrin Keil Kathrin Keil 12–18
  - 19–22 Zwischen Soft Security und Show of Force: Zur Streitkräftepräsenz der Anrainerstaaten in der Arktis Golo Bartsch Golo Bartsch 19–22
  - 23–29 Sicherheitspolitik im Arktischen Rat? Lieber nicht! Christoph Humrich Christoph Humrich 23–29
  - 30–35 The Role of China in Emerging Arctic Security Discourses Marc Lanteigne Marc Lanteigne 30–35
- 36–41 BEITRÄGE AUS SICHERHEITSPOLITIK UND FRIEDENSFORSCHUNG 36–41
  - Wie groß sind die Erfolgsaussichten der Russland-Sanktionen? Viljar Veebel, Raul Markus Viljar Veebel, Raul Markus
- 41–42 NEUERSCHEINUNGEN 41–42
- 42–42 ANNOTATIONEN 42–42
- 43–52 BESPRECHUNGEN 43–52
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

S&F Sicherheit und Frieden , page 7 - 11

Die Europäische Union und die Arktis. Status quo und Handlungsperspektiven

Autoren

Tobias Etzold Stefan Steinicke

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2015-3-7
- ISSN: 0175-274X
- ISSN online: 0175-274x
Zusammenfassung

For several years now the EU has tried to strengthen its Arctic profile beyond its existing polar research activities. This attempt manifests itself in a number of official Arctic-related documents outlining the EU’s interests and political goals in the region, and the application to become a permanent observer in the Arctic Council (AC). Both approaches have to be questioned, however, as the EU’s Arctic profile was in practice only marginally enhanced in recent years. Thus, two questions have to be answered: (1) Why did the EU not succeed in developing a more pronounced Arctic profile? (2) What kind of alternative or complementary courses of action exist to support or increase the EU’s Arctic engagement?

Abstract

For several years now the EU has tried to strengthen its Arctic profile beyond its existing polar research activities. This attempt manifests itself in a number of official Arctic-related documents outlining the EU’s interests and political goals in the region, and the application to become a permanent observer in the Arctic Council (AC). Both approaches have to be questioned, however, as the EU’s Arctic profile was in practice only marginally enhanced in recent years. Thus, two questions have to be answered: (1) Why did the EU not succeed in developing a more pronounced Arctic profile? (2) What kind of alternative or complementary courses of action exist to support or increase the EU’s Arctic engagement?
Share