Zwischen Soft Security und Show of Force: Zur Streitkräftepräsenz der Anrainerstaaten in der Arktis

Golo Bartsch

doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2015-3-19

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- 1–35 DIE ARKTIS: REGIONALE KOOPERATION ODER KONFLIKT? 1–35
  - 1–6 Die Mär vom Kalten Krieg. Wie geopolitische Paradigmen in den internationalen Beziehungen im Arktisraum (re)produziert werden Sebastian Knecht Sebastian Knecht 1–6
  - 7–11 Die Europäische Union und die Arktis. Status quo und Handlungsperspektiven Tobias Etzold, Stefan Steinicke Tobias Etzold, Stefan Steinicke 7–11
  - 12–18 Die Zukunft arktischer Öl- und Gasressourcen – internationale Einflussfaktoren arktischer Energieressourcenentwicklung Kathrin Keil Kathrin Keil 12–18
  - 19–22 Zwischen Soft Security und Show of Force: Zur Streitkräftepräsenz der Anrainerstaaten in der Arktis Golo Bartsch Golo Bartsch 19–22
  - 23–29 Sicherheitspolitik im Arktischen Rat? Lieber nicht! Christoph Humrich Christoph Humrich 23–29
  - 30–35 The Role of China in Emerging Arctic Security Discourses Marc Lanteigne Marc Lanteigne 30–35
- 36–41 BEITRÄGE AUS SICHERHEITSPOLITIK UND FRIEDENSFORSCHUNG 36–41
  - Wie groß sind die Erfolgsaussichten der Russland-Sanktionen? Viljar Veebel, Raul Markus Viljar Veebel, Raul Markus
- 41–42 NEUERSCHEINUNGEN 41–42
- 42–42 ANNOTATIONEN 42–42
- 43–52 BESPRECHUNGEN 43–52
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

S&F Sicherheit und Frieden , page 19 - 22

Zwischen Soft Security und Show of Force: Zur Streitkräftepräsenz der Anrainerstaaten in der Arktis

Autoren

Golo Bartsch

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2015-3-19
- ISSN: 0175-274X
- ISSN online: 0175-274x
Zusammenfassung

The initial „Arctic hype“ from 2007 onwards had already calmed down for a while. But with the Ukraine crisis of 2014, the military situation in the High North has once again become an element of rather anxious public debate. Even before relations between Russia and NATO worsened, the coastal states had started to again increase their military presence in the region. Is the “Arctic arms race” on again, as it was during the Cold War? The increase in capacities in the North is not a conclusive evidence of directly imminent military confrontation, but can be explained in a more differentiated manner with a view on the spatial and political conditions of the region. Even as there is more military presence, the risk of outbreak of armed conflict remains very low.

Abstract

The initial „Arctic hype“ from 2007 onwards had already calmed down for a while. But with the Ukraine crisis of 2014, the military situation in the High North has once again become an element of rather anxious public debate. Even before relations between Russia and NATO worsened, the coastal states had started to again increase their military presence in the region. Is the “Arctic arms race” on again, as it was during the Cold War? The increase in capacities in the North is not a conclusive evidence of directly imminent military confrontation, but can be explained in a more differentiated manner with a view on the spatial and political conditions of the region. Even as there is more military presence, the risk of outbreak of armed conflict remains very low.
Share