Jump to content
Digitization and the Law / Hacking the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, Dangers, and Legal Responses
Digitization and the Law / Hacking the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, Dangers, and Legal Responses
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Authors
Page
1–8
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–8
Details
9–20
Introduction: Digitization and the Law – a European Perspective
Eric Hilgendorf
Eric Hilgendorf
9–20
Details
I. New Technologies and their Convergence
II. The Digital Revolution and the Law
(1) New Tools and Methodologies in the Law
(2) Application of the Law: Can it Accommodate the Change?
(3) Legal Policy
(4) From Programming to the Algorithmization of the Law
(5) New Ways of Disseminating and Consuming Legal Content
(6) The Consequences of Digitization for the Perception, Acceptance and Functioning of the Law
(7) Societal and Political Consequences
III. Summary and Outlook
21–40
Hacking the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, Dangers, and Legal Responses
Sara Sun Beale, Peter Berris
Sara Sun Beale, Peter Berris
21–40
Details
Introduction
I. Threats and Vulnerabilities
A. How the IoT has been hacked
B. Other ways the IoT could be hacked
II. Why is the IoT so insecure and vulnerable to hacking?
III. The Internet of Things and the Current Legal Regime
A. Scenario one: hacking with the intention of controlling an object
1. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
2. Other laws
B. Scenario two: botnets
IV. Improving the Security of the IoT
A. The Standards Approach
B. Agency Regulation
C. Legalizing Strikebacks
V. Conclusion
41–56
Robotics and Criminal Law. Negligence, Diffusion of Liability and Electronic Personhood
Susanne Beck
Susanne Beck
41–56
Details
1. The Current Development of Robotics from a Legal Perspective
2. Legal Questions – Overview
2.1. Public Law: Controlling the Risks
2.2. Civil Law: Liability for Damages
2.3. Criminal Law: Responsibility for the Robot`s Action?
3. Focus: Robotics and Criminal Law
4. Responsibility – Challenged by Robotics?
5. Potential Legal Solutions and Their Consequences for Concepts
6. Conclusion: What are we discussing?
57–90
The dilemma of autonomous driving: Reflections on the moral and legal treatment of automatic collision avoidance systems
Eric Hilgendorf
Eric Hilgendorf
57–90
Details
Introduction
I. Automated driving and the law
II. Ethical and legal guidelines as well as a proposed solution
1. “Setting off” human lives vs. a humane orientation in the law
2. A proposed solution: Degrees of wrong
3. Use of deadly force in especially grave emergency situations involving or not involving risk communities
III. The quantification of human life in current applicable law
IV. Special problems
1. The probability of being injured
2. Self-protection measures
3. Actions and omissions
V. The liability of manufacturers of collision avoidance systems
1. Exclusion of liability using the concept of “accepted risk”
2. Counterarguments
3. Passenger protection
4. What risks should be considered “accepted” risks?
VI. Closing remarks
91–110
Criminalizing attacks against information systems in the EU and the impact of the European legal instruments on the Greek legal order
Maria Kaiafa-Gbandi
Maria Kaiafa-Gbandi
91–110
Details
1. Introduction
2. The European and international institutional framework concerning attacks against information systems
2.1. A comparative survey of a complex framework
2.2. The reasons for the E.U. directive and the core questions arising in a comparative context
2.3. A comparative survey of the criminal law rules on attacks against information systems on a European and international level
2.3.1. An initial approach
2.3.2. Proscribed types of conduct
2.3.3. Criminal sanctions
2.3.4. Assessing the E.U. policy on criminalizing attacks against information systems in a comparative context
3. The EU directive on attacks against information systems and the Greek legal order: points of convergence and some pertinent problems
4. Instead of a conclusion
111–126
The U.S. Supreme Court’s First Amendment refusal to protect children regarding sexually explicit speech on the Internet
Mark S. Kende
Mark S. Kende
111–126
Details
1. Intoduction
2. Background
3. Reno v. ACLU
4. Ashcroft v. ACLU II
5. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
6. Recent Developments
a. Elonis v. United States
b. Packingham v. North Carolina
7. Conclusion
127–140
Trust: Privacy in the Digital Age
Ari Ezra Waldman
Ari Ezra Waldman
127–140
Details
Introduction
I. A New Way of Looking at Privacy
II. Applying Privacy-As-Trust: A Case Study
A. The Current Approach: Notice and Choice
B. A New Approach: Trust
Conclusion
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY
Access
Digitization and the Law , page 21 - 40
Hacking the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, Dangers, and Legal Responses
Autoren
Sara Sun Beale
Peter Berris
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783845289304-21
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-4700-9
ISBN online: 978-3-8452-8930-4
Chapter Preview
Share
Current chapter
Complete document
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783845289304-21
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
