Jump to content
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities / VII. Conclusion
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities / VII. Conclusion
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Page
1–4
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–4
Details
5–6
Foreword
5–6
Details
7–18
Acknowledgements
7–18
Details
19–24
List of Abbreviations
19–24
Details
25–34
I. Introduction
25–34
Details
1. Introduction to the subject of investigation
2. Research questions
3. Research Design
3.1 Research Gaps
3.2 Conceptual Framework
3.3 Analytical Framework
4. Structure of the Researchwork
35–94
II. Development of Analytical Framework
35–94
Details
1. Conceptualisation of Governance
1.1 Multi-level Governance
1.1.1 TYPE I MLG
1.1.2 TYPE II MLG
1.2 Federal and Unitary Systems
1.2.1 Federal systems
1.2.2 Unitary Systems
2. Conceptualisation of Legal Systems
2.1 Legal Systems
2.1.1 Civil Law Legal Systems
2.2 The Reception and Execution of International Law
2.2.1 The Reception of International Law
2.2.2 The Execution of International Law at the Domestic Level
3. MLG and CPRD Implementation
3.1 CPRD Monitoring at the International Level
3.2 EU Disability Framework
3.2.1 EU Primary Law
3.2.2 EU Secondary Law
3.2.3 European Disability Strategies
3.2.4 The CPRD Conclusion by the EU
3.3 CPRD Implementation at the National Level
3.3.1 CPRD Implementation at the Sub-National Level
3.3.2 Focal Points
3.3.3 Coordination Mechanisms
3.3.4 National Human Rights Institutions
3.3.4.1 Independence and Legal Status
3.3.4.2 Composition
A. Pluralist representation
B. Adequate infrastructure
C. Method of appointment/dismissal
3.3.4.3 Mandate, Competence and Responsibilities
A. Promotion Competence
B. Protection Competence
C. Monitoring Competence
3.3.4.4 Methods of Operation
A. System of multi-level NHRIs/MFs
B. Multi-level cooperation with state and non-state bodies
3.3.5 Organized Interests
3.3.5.1 Types of Organized Interests
3.3.5.2 DPO Types in the LMG Framework
95–124
III. Research Methodology
95–124
Details
1. The comparative method in political analysis
1.1 Method of congruence
1.2 Method of Systematic Process Analysis
2. Case Study approach
2.1 Case Selection
2.2 Choice of Representative Case
3. MSSD and MDSD
3.1 Most Similar Systems Design
3.2 Most Different Systems Design
3.3 Application within this Research Work
4. Methods of data Collection and Analysis
4.1 Documentation Analysis
4.2 Expert Interviews
4.2.1 Application of systematizing expert interviews
4.2.2 Technical Details
125–210
IV. State Actors and National Implementation
125–210
Details
1. Structure of states and their constitutional organs
1.1 Federal Republic of Germany
1.1.1 Federal Level Constitutional Organs
1.1.1.1 Structure and resources of federal Focal Point
1.1.1.2 Structure and resources of federal-level Coordination Mechanism
1.1.2 Länder-level constitutional organs
1.1.2.1 Structure and resources of Länder-level Focal Points
1.1.2.2 Structure and resources of Länder-level Coordination Mechanisms
1.2 Federal Republic of Austria
1.2.1 Federal Level Constitutional Organs
1.2.1.1 Structure and resources of Austrian federal Focal Point and Coordination Mechanism
1.2.2 Länder-level constitutional organs
1.2.2.1 Länder-level Focal Points and Coordination Mechanisms
1.3 Kingdom of Denmark
1.3.1 Structure and resources of Danish Focal Point and Coordination Mechanism
2. Division of Legislative and Executive Competencies
2.1 Federal Republic of Germany
2.1.1 Exclusive legislative competencies
2.1.2 Concurrent legislative competencies
2.2 Federal Republic of Austria
2.3 Kingdom of Denmark
3. Incorporation and application of International Law in the domestic legal system
3.1 Federal Republic of Germany
3.2 Federal Republic of Austria
3.3 Kingdom of Denmark
4. CPRD Ratification, Incorporation and Application
4.1 Federal Republic of Germany
4.1.1 Ratification and legal status
4.1.2 CPRD incorporation and application in the policy fields under the legislative powers of federation
4.1.2.1 Responsibilities of the federal Focal Point and Coordination Mechanism
4.1.2.2 Legislative Action
4.1.2.3 Consideration by the Courts
4.1.3 CPRD incorporation and application in the policy fields under the legislative powers of federal states
4.1.3.1 Responsibilities of Focal Points and Coordination Mechanisms
4.1.3.2 Legislative action and concideration by the courts in the field of cultural rights
4.1.3.2.1 Reasonable educational accommodations
4.1.3.2.2 Accessible schools
4.2 Federal Republic of Austria
4.2.1 Ratification, legal status and consideration by the courts
4.2.2 Responsibilities of Focal Point/Coordination Mechanisms and legislative actions
4.3 Kingdom of Denmark
4.3.1 Ratification, legal status and concideration by the courts
4.3.2 Responsibilities of Danish Focal Point/Coordination Mechanism and legislative actions
5. Comparative evaluation
5.1 Effective restructuring
5.2 Adequate resources
5.3 Horizontal and vertical coordination
5.4 Democratic control and accountability
5.5 Multi-level equity of implementation
211–270
V. National Monitoring Mechanisms
211–270
Details
1. Structure of National Monitoring Mechanisms
1.1 German National Monitoring Body
1.1.1 Legal status and system
1.1.2 Pluralist representation and the method of appointment/dismissal
1.2 Austrian Monitoring Framework
1.1.1 Legal status and system
1.2.2 Pluralist representation and the method of appointment/dismissal
1.2.2.1 Federal Monitoring Committee
1.2.2.2 Provincial Monitoring Committeess
1.3 Danish Monitoring Framework
1.3.1 Legal status and System
1.3.2 Pluralist representation and method of appointment/dismissal
1.3.2.1 Danish Institute of Human Rights
1.3.2.2 Danish Parliamentary Ombudsman
1.3.2.3 Danish Disability Council
2. Resources of National Monitoring Mechanisms
2.1 German National Monitoring Body
2.2 Austrian Monitoring Framework
2.3 Danish Monitoring Framework
3. Mandate of National Monitoring Mechanisms
3.1 German National Monitoring Body
3.1.1 Promotion
3.1.2 Monitoring
3.1.3 Protection
3.1.4 Multi-level Cooperation with state and non-state bodies
3.2 Austrian Monitoring Framework
3.2.1 Promotion
3.2.2 Monitoring
3.2.3 Protection
3.2.4 Multi-Level Cooperation
3.3 Danish Monitoring Framework
3.3.1 Promotion
3.3.2 Monitoring
3.3.3 Protection
3.3.4 Multi-level cooperation with state and non-state bodies
4. Comparative Evaluation
4.1 Legal Status
4.2 Multi-level competence
4.3 Broad Mandate
4.3.1 Promotion mandate
4.3.2 Monitoring mandate
4.3.3 Protection mandate
4.4 Inclusive composition and independence
4.4.1 Non-state actors
4.4.2 State actors
4.5 Appointment and dismissal
4.6 Adequate infrastructure
4.7 Accessibility
4.8 Cooperation at the vertical and horizontal governmental levels
271–380
VI. Organizations of DPs
271–380
Details
1. Structures of DPOS
1.1 Structure of German DPOs
1.1.1 Legal Framework and Governing Configuration
1.1.2 Types of Disability Organizations
A. Individual organizations
B. Collective representation
1.1.3 Multi-level representation
1.2 Structure of Austrian DPOs
1.2.1 Legal Framework and Governing Configuration
1.2.2 Types of Disability Organizations
A. Individual Organizations
B. Collective Representation
1.2.3 Multi-Level Representation
1.3 Structure of Danish DPOS
1.3.1 Legal framework and governing configuration
1.3.2 Types of Disability organizations
A. Individual Organizations
B. Colective Representation
1.3.3 Multi-Level Representation
2. Resources of DPOS
2.1 Resources of German DPOs
2.2 Resources of Austrian DPOs
2.3 Resources of Danish DPOS
3. Aims and Actions of DPOS
3.1 Aims and Actions of German DPOs
3.1.1 Promoting the rights of DPs in decision-making processes
3.1.1.1 Participation in Advisory Bodies
3.1.1.2 Participation at decision-making processes of executive organs
3.1.1.3 Participation at legislative processes of parliaments
3.1.2 Monitoring the implementation of the rights of DPs
3.1.3 Protecting the rights of DPs
3.2 Aims and Actions of Austrian DPOs
3.2.1 Promoting the rights of DPs in legislative processes
3.2.1.1 Participation in Advisory Bodies
3.2.1.2 Participation at decision-making processes of executive organs
3.2.1.3 Participation at legislative processes of parliaments
3.2.2 Monitoring the implementation of the rights of DPs
3.2.3 Protecting the rights of DPs
3.3 Aims and Actions of Danish DPOS
3.3.1 Promoting the rights of DPs in legislative processes
3.3.1.1 Participation in advisory bodies
3.3.1.2 Participation at decision-making processes of executive organs
3.3.1.3 Participation at legislative processes of parliament
3.3.2 Monitoring the implementation of the rights of DPs
3.3.3 Protecting the rights of DPs
4. Comparative Evaluation
4.1 Multi-level structural configuration of DPOs
4.2 Resources of DPOs in multi-level prospective
4.3 Vertical and horizontal level political participation of DPOs
4.4 DPO Involvement in monitoring activities
4.5 Alternative instruments of influence
4.5.1 Awareness Raising Activities
4.5.2 Collective Legal Action
381–386
VII. Conclusion
381–386
Details
1. How is the CPRD incorporated in the domestic law and how can this type of incorporation affect the implementation of the Convention?
2. How are the actors under the Art. 33 CPRD financed?
2.1 FPs and CMs
2.2 National Monitoring Frameworks
2.3 Organizations of DPs
3. How is the interplay within and between the actors under the Art. 33 CPRD organized and what are the roles of these actors in the implementation process of the Convention at the vertical and horizo...
387–438
Bibliography
387–438
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY
Access
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , page 381 - 386
VII. Conclusion
Autoren
Lilit Grigoryan
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748941651-381
ISBN print: 978-3-7560-1034-9
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-4165-1
Share
Download PDF
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748941651-381
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
