Jump to content
Medicine as Science / 2. For a Sociology of Disciplinary Cultures
Medicine as Science / 2. For a Sociology of Disciplinary Cultures
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Page
1–11
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–11
Details
12–14
Acknowledgements
12–14
Details
15–42
1. Introduction: Science and Medicine – Two Cultures Lost in Translation?
15–42
Details
I. Towards a Historical Sociology of Medicine’s Disciplinary Identity
II. The Forgotten Disciplinary Identity of Medicine
III. Historical Semantics and Discourse Analysis – Theoretical Approach and Method
43–65
2. For a Sociology of Disciplinary Cultures
43–65
Details
I. Academic Knowledge and the Social Structure of Science
II. From the Culture of Science to Cultures of Research
III. The Emergence of Disciplinary Cultures in the Modern Research University
IV. Academic Tribes and Disciplinary Territories
V. Disciplines as Political Institutions
VI. Disciplinary Boundary and Identity Work
66–101
3. The Birth of a Modern Discipline – Medicine as Wissenschaft in German Romanticism
66–101
Details
I. Medicine Between Art and Learnedness – The Conceptual Background
II. The Institutional Environment in Prussia’s Capital
III. Johann Christian Reil’s Plan for Reforming Academic Medicine
IV. A Modern Division of Medical Labor
V. The New Physiology as Modern Medicine’s Scientific Culture
VI. The Function of Medicine as a Modern Academic Discipline
102–134
4. An Applied Science Between Laboratory and Clinic – Scientific Medicine in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Germany
102–134
Details
I. Medicine as an Exact Science – The Physiological Program
II. The Ideology of Methodology in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Germany
III. Rudolf Virchow’s Program of Scientific Medicine
a. The Science of Pathology
b. A Science of Therapy
135–159
5. The Laboratory and the Making of Clinical Science during the Progressive Era – Scientific Medicine in the USA
135–159
Details
I. German Ideals of Academic Medicine in the American Discourse
II. From Applied Science to the Pure Science of Clinical Medicine
III. Institutional Ambiguities of Medical and Biological Research
160–183
6. Constructing the Identity of a Late Modern Discipline – Biomedical Science and the Life Sciences in the Post-War United States
160–183
Details
I. The Birth of the Administrative Shorthand “Biomedical”
II. From “Allied” to “Underlying” Sciences
III. The Political Boundary Between Biomedical Science and the Life Sciences
IV. The Linear Legacy of Biomedicine
184–203
7. Averting Conceptual Crisis – Semantic Stabilization of a Disciplinary Identity in the Twenty-First Century
184–203
Details
I. Evidence-Based Medicine and the New Cultural Foundation of Clinical Practice
II. Shifting the Basis of Clinical Medicine Through Guidelines
III. Confirming the Linear Legacy with Translational Science
IV. The Character of Translation Practices
204–212
8. Conclusion – Biomedicine as Discipline and Integrational Category
204–212
Details
213–226
Bibliography
213–226
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY
Access
Medicine as Science , page 43 - 65
2. For a Sociology of Disciplinary Cultures
Autoren
Phillip H. Roth
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748931881-43
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-8750-0
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-3188-1
Chapter Preview
Share
Download PDF
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748931881-43
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
