Jump to content
The Making of iCourts / The Making of iCourts
The Making of iCourts / The Making of iCourts
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Authors
Page
1–8
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–8
Details
11–44
I. Introduction
11–44
11–40
The Making of iCourts
Henrik Stampe Lund, Henrik Palmer Olsen
Henrik Stampe Lund, Henrik Palmer Olsen
11–40
Details
iCourts: The Making of a New Agenda for Legal research
Details
Introduction – iCourts as an international research hub
Details
Introduction
Details
The Landscape is Changing
Details
The Blue Sky: Basic Research with a bottom up agenda
Details
Embracing visitors
Details
The pre-history of iCourts:
Details
From Idea to Project: The First contours of iCourts
Details
41–44
iCourts as a workshop – an impressionistic hand sketch
Henrik Stampe Lund
Henrik Stampe Lund
41–44
Details
47–248
II. Contributions from visiting professors
47–248
47–90
A Taxonomy of International Rule of Law Institutions
Cesare P.R. Romano
Cesare P.R. Romano
47–90
Details
1. Classification, Typology and Taxonomy
Details
A. Domain: International Governmental Organizations
Details
B. Kingdom: International Rule of Law Bodies and Procedures
Details
C. Class: Adjudicative Means
Details
D. Class: Non-Adjudicative Means
Details
E. Orders of International Courts and Tribunals, Arbitral Tribunals and International Claims and Compensations Bodies
Details
F. Families of International Courts and Tribunals
Details
2. Conclusions
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
Details
91–134
Coping with crisis: whither the variable geometry in the jurisprudence of the european court of human rights
Başak Çali
Başak Çali
91–134
Details
INTRODUCTION
Details
I. A CONVENTION EUROPE THAT NO LONGER IS
Details
A. FRACTURES AMONGST WESTERN EUROPEAN FOUNDERS: THE UNITED KINGDOM IN THE LEAD
Details
B. THE NEW EUROPE: RISE OF REVERSE TRANSITIONS AND ILLIBERAL DEMOCRACIES
Details
II. COPING WITH THE FRACTURED CONVENTION ACQUIS
Details
A. LETTING GOOD FAITH INTERPRETERS BE
Details
B. TURN TO BAD FAITH JURISPRUDENCE
Details
III. WHITHER THE VARIABLE GEOMETRY IN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS SUBSTANTIVE CASE LAW?
Details
IV. CONCLUSION
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
135–152
EU Law Classics in the Making: Methodological Notes on Grands arrêts at the European Court of Justice
Antoine Vauchez
Antoine Vauchez
135–152
Details
Searching (for) cases
Details
Landmark cases as a genre
Details
The Matthew Effect
Details
EU Law’s Conception of Wealth and Worth
Details
From caseload to case law: the politics of jurisprudence
Details
Investigating Hermeneutic Spaces
Details
A Plea for “Thick Description”
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
153–176
Prosecutorial strategies and opening statements
Ron Levi, Sara Dezalay, Michael Amiraslani
Ron Levi, Sara Dezalay, Michael Amiraslani
153–176
Details
Justifying international prosecutions from the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg through to the International Criminal Court
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Prosecutorial discourse as practice: studying repertoires, stability, innovation, and change in international legal fields
Details
III. Prosecutorial opening statements: legal innovation in unsettled times
Details
IV. The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg: hedging across topics and across time
Details
V. The International Criminal Court: investing in technicality and law as an unhedged bet
Details
VI. Conclusion
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
177–210
Theorizing the Judicialization of International Relations
Karen J. Alter, Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Laurence R. Helfer
Karen J. Alter, Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Laurence R. Helfer
177–210
Details
Judicializing Politics: A Trend (with an End?)
Details
Scope Conditions for Judicialized Politics
Details
Phases of Judicialized Politics
Details
Politics between and across the Four Phases
Details
When Judicialized Politics Matter
Details
Conclusion
Details
References
Details
Our iCourts experience
Details
211–224
The Rise of the Neo-Hobbesian Age: Thirty Years Since the Fall of the Berlin Wall
Achilles Skordas
Achilles Skordas
211–224
Details
I. The Age
Details
II. Conflicts and Normative Projects
Details
III. Destiny
Details
IV. Project 1: Mother Earth
Details
V. Project 2: Cosmos
Details
VI. The New Tale of Two Utopias
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
225–248
Emergence of network effects and predictability in the judicial system
Enys Mones, Piotr Sapieżyński, Simon Thordal, Henrik Palmer Olsen, Sune Lehmann
Enys Mones, Piotr Sapieżyński, Simon Thordal, Henrik Palmer Olsen, Sune Lehmann
225–248
Details
Results
Details
Link prediction.
Details
How the model identifies individual cases.
Details
Evolution of feature importances.
Details
Interpreting model errors.
Details
Discussion
Details
Importance of understanding empirical patterns of case law usage.
Details
Applications.
Details
Risks and limitations.
Details
Conclusion.
Details
Model.
Details
Predictability.
Details
Acknowledgements
Details
Author contributions
Details
Competing interest
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
251–374
III. Contributions from Guest researchers
251–374
251–284
Translating Ambiguity
Karen McAuliffe
Karen McAuliffe
251–284
Details
INTRODUCTION
Details
WHAT CAN INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH BRING TO THE STUDY OF EU LAW?
Details
The Need to Consider Language
Details
METHODOLOGY
Details
MULTI-LAYERED LINGUISTIC CULTURAL COMPROMISES IN EU LAW?
Details
Linguistic Cultural Compromises in Drafting
Details
Linguistic Cultural Compromises in Translation
Details
CONCLUSION
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
285–322
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: mapping resistance against a young court
Tom Gerald Daly, Micha Wiebusch
Tom Gerald Daly, Micha Wiebusch
285–322
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. Forms and patterns of resistance
Details
3. The context of resistance against the African Court
Details
4. Development of the court: forms and patterns of resistance
Details
4.1 Resistance and ambivalence reflected in the Court’s design
Details
4.2 Resistance hampering the Court’s development: key actors
Details
4.2.1 National governments
Details
4.2.2 National courts
Details
4.2.3 NGOs
Details
5 Development of the Court’s case-law
Details
5.1 Overview of the Court’s case-law
Details
5.2 Resistance against the Court’s case-law
Details
5.2.1 Tanzania
Details
5.2.2 Rwanda
Details
6 Conclusion
Details
References
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
323–330
Cambodians await crucial tribunal finding into 1970s brutal Khmer Rouge regime
Rachel Hughes, Christoph Sperfeldt, Maria Elander
Rachel Hughes, Christoph Sperfeldt, Maria Elander
323–330
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
331–356
Ruling through the International Criminal Court’s rules: legalized hegemony, sovereign (in)equality, and the Al Bashir Case
Luisa Giannini, Roberto Vilchez Yamato, Claudia Alvarenga Marconi
Luisa Giannini, Roberto Vilchez Yamato, Claudia Alvarenga Marconi
331–356
Details
Introduction
Details
From international rules to the ruling of the international
Details
The Al Bashir Case: (re)reading the relationship between the ICC and the UNSC
Details
The Al Bashir Case, Sovereign (In)equality, and Ruling through Rules
Details
Conclusion
Details
Acknowledgments:
Details
References
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
357–374
Extraterritoriality reconsidered: functional boundaries as repositories of jurisdiction
Ezgi Yildiz
Ezgi Yildiz
357–374
Details
Introduction
Details
The European Court of Human Rights and the principle of territoriality
Details
The Court’s view on jurisdiction and extraterritoriality
Details
The spatial control model: effective control over territory
Details
The personal control model: the state agent authority and control
Details
The turn to functional jurisdiction
Details
‘It all makes sense now!’ Jaloud v. the Netherlands
Details
Conclusion
Details
Bibliography
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
377–488
IV. Contributions from former staff members
377–488
377–406
In the CJEU Judges Trust: A New Approach in the Judicial Construction of Europe
Juan A. Mayoral
Juan A. Mayoral
377–406
Details
Trust as an alternative for cooperating with the CJEU
Details
A Theory of Judicial Trust in the CJEU
Details
a) The CJEU as a guidance provider
Details
b) The CJEU as a mediator in multilevel legal orders
Details
c) Knowledge and experience with EU law
Details
d) Trust in domestic judicial institutions
Details
e) Support for the EU
Details
In the CJEU national judges trust: An empirical assessment
Details
Conclusions
Details
References
Details
APPENDIX:
Details
Survey procedure
Details
Variables
Details
Statistical results:
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
407–440
Unidentified Legal Object: Conceptualising the European Union in International Law
Jed Odermatt
Jed Odermatt
407–440
Details
I. Introduction: What is the European Union?
Details
A. Divergent Approaches
Details
II. Conceptualizing the EU in International Law: Four Models
Details
A. The Union’s Self-Perception: A ‘New Legal Order’
Details
1. The EU as sui generis
Details
2. Opinion 2/13 and the New Legal Order Narrative
Details
B. The EU as a ‘Self-contained Regime’
Details
1. The Brexit Debate
Details
C. The EU as a Regional Economic Integration Organization (REIO)
Details
1. REIOs Before the International Law Commission
Details
D. The EU as a (Classic) International Organization
Details
III. Theorizing the EU’s International Legal Character
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
Details
441–470
The Uneven Impact of International Human Rights Law in Africa’s Subregional Courts
Solomon Ebobrah
Solomon Ebobrah
441–470
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. The Legitimising Role of Human Rights in International Relations: An African Anxiety?
Details
3. Human Rights in the Mandates of the Subregional Courts
Details
3.1 Human Rights in the Treaty Framework of the East African Court of Justice
Details
3.2 Human Rights in the Treaty Framework of the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African State
Details
4. The Varying Application of International Human Rights Law by Africa’s Subregional Courts
Details
4.1 International Human Rights in the Practice of the EACJ
Details
4.2 International Human Rights in the Practice of the ECCJ
Details
4.2.1 Expanding ratione personae
Details
4.2.2 Overriding Domestic Obstacles to Human Rights Adjudication
Details
4.2.3 International Human Rights Law as Justification for ECCJ Decisions
Details
5. Conclusion
Details
My iCourts experience
Details
471–488
Territorial Disputes by Proxy: The Indirect Involvement of International Courts in the Mega-politics of Territory
Salvatore Caserta, Pola Cebulak
Salvatore Caserta, Pola Cebulak
471–488
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Territorial Disputes by Proxy And The Mega-politics of Territory
Details
III. Commercial and Institutional Territorial Disputes by Proxy in The Practice of Regional Economic Courts
Details
A. The Mega-politics of Territory in The Practice of The Central American Court of Justice
Details
IV. Right-Based And Institutional Territorial Disputes by Proxy in The Practice of The European Court of Human Rights
Details
V. Conclusions
Details
Our iCourts experience
Details
489–632
V. Appendix I-VII
489–632
Details
Appendix I: iCourts Publication List: 2012-2021
Details
Working papers
Details
Appendix II: Publication List for Center Director Mikael Rask Madsen 2012-2021
Details
Working papers
Details
Appendix III: iCourts Staff List – 2012
Details
Appendix IV: iCourts Staff List - 2021
Details
Appendix V: Visiting Researchers 2012-2021
Details
Appendix VI: Hyperlink to iCourts Working Papers Series
Details
Appendix VII: Principal Investigator Projects at iCourts
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY-NC-ND
Access
The Making of iCourts , page 11 - 40
The Making of iCourts
Autoren
Henrik Stampe Lund
Henrik Palmer Olsen
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748927884-11
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-8412-7
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-2788-4
Chapter Preview
Chapter Preview
Share
Current chapter
Complete document
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748927884-11
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
