Much Ado About Something? The PIF Directive Proposal and its Impact on the Italian Legal System

Giovanni F. Perilongo

doi:10.5771/2193-5505-2016-3-265

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- 229–230 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 229–230
- 231–233 Editorial Luigi Foffani Luigi Foffani 231–233
- 234–307 Articles 234–307
  - 234–264 Collateral Sanctions for Offenders and Ex-offenders – Contrasts between the United States of America and Nordic European Countries José Luis Díez-Ripollés José Luis Díez-Ripollés 234–264
  - 265–283 Much Ado About Something? The PIF Directive Proposal and its Impact on the Italian Legal System Giovanni F. Perilongo Giovanni F. Perilongo 265–283
  - 284–307 Potential Remedies for Violation of the Right to Counsel in Criminal Proceedings: Article 12 of the Directive 2013/48/EU (22 October2013) and its Output in National Legislation Anneli Soo Anneli Soo 284–307
- 308–329 Varia 308–329
  - 308–320 The Transfer of Sentenced Persons Between European Countries and the Protection of the Right to Family Life: A Comment on Serce v Romania (Application no. 35049/08) (30 June 2015) Jamil Ddamulira Mujuzi Jamil Ddamulira Mujuzi 308–320
  - 321–329 Case Note on Nemtsov v. Russia with Particular Focus on the Misuse of State Power: The European Court of Human Rights at a Crossroads Martin Eibach Martin Eibach 321–329
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

EuCLR European Criminal Law Review , page 265 - 283

Much Ado About Something? The PIF Directive Proposal and its Impact on the Italian Legal System

Autoren

Giovanni F. Perilongo

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2016-3-265
- ISSN: 2191-7442
- ISSN online: 2193-5505
Abstract

The essay analyses and compares the supranational and the Italian legal frameworks on the protection of the financial interests of the EU, with a view to investigating the significance of the developments in this field for the Italian criminal justice system. After an historical overview of the evolution of EU frauds and fraud-related offences, the article analyses the 2012 PIF Directive Proposal, providing a state of play of the current negotiations. The author then examines the Italian legal framework on EU frauds: the study covers the discipline provided for by both the Penal Code and by complementary legislation, in order to point out the provisions that could be concerned by the new harmonised criminal law instrument. The final paragraph focuses on the different criminal policies pursued by the national and supranational legislators in the contrast to tax frauds.
Share