„To be or not to be?“ Das Spitzenkandidatenprinzip in der Europawahl 2019 und zukünftige Szenarien

Yvonne Nasshoven

doi:10.5771/0720-5120-2019-4-280

Inhalt
- Kapitel Ausklappen | EinklappenAutorenSeiten
- 245–246 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 245–246
- 247–320 AUFSÄTZE 247–320
  - 247–261 Von der Entgrenzung zur Eingrenzung: Krise und Wandel der europäischen Integration Frank Schimmelfennig Frank Schimmelfennig 247–261
  - 262–279 Rivalität mit System? Zehn Jahre institutioneller Wettbewerb zwischen Europäischem Parlament und Europäischem Rat Johannes Müller Gómez, Wulf Reiners Johannes Müller Gómez, Wulf Reiners 262–279
  - 280–296 „To be or not to be?“ Das Spitzenkandidatenprinzip in der Europawahl 2019 und zukünftige Szenarien Yvonne Nasshoven Yvonne Nasshoven 280–296
  - 297–320 Die EU-Zentralasienstrategie 2019 – mehr Handlungsrahmen als strategisches Dokument Katrin Böttger, Yvonne Braun, Julian Plottka Katrin Böttger, Yvonne Braun, Julian Plottka 297–320
- 321–328 FORUM 321–328
  - „Let’s archive!“ Die Dokumentation internetbasierter Daten als neue Herausforderung für die europäische Integrationsforschung Daniel Göler, Florence Reiter Daniel Göler, Florence Reiter
- 329–335 TAGUNGEN 329–335
  - Deutschland in Europa: Hegemon oder ehrlicher Makler? Erik Brandes Erik Brandes
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
Vollzugriff

integration , Seite 280 - 296

„To be or not to be?“ Das Spitzenkandidatenprinzip in der Europawahl 2019 und zukünftige Szenarien

Autoren

Yvonne Nasshoven

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2019-4-280
- ISSN print: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 2941-8895
Zusammenfassung

This contribution examines the process of appointing the President of the European Commission in the aftermath of the European elections 2019. It analyses the interests of the players involved and mirrors these against the backdrop of patterns of earlier nominations. In addition, the article reflects on consequences for the political system of the European Union as a whole, especially with regard to the role of European political parties. The contribution finally develops possible scenarios for future appointments: In general, these could take cooperative or competing formats. In case of furthering supranational elements transnational lists could be used in combination with the “Spitzenkandidaten process”. This would still require a “saut qualitatif” by the European party families.

Abstract

This contribution examines the process of appointing the President of the European Commission in the aftermath of the European elections 2019. It analyses the interests of the players involved and mirrors these against the backdrop of patterns of earlier nominations. In addition, the article reflects on consequences for the political system of the European Union as a whole, especially with regard to the role of European political parties. The contribution finally develops possible scenarios for future appointments: In general, these could take cooperative or competing formats. In case of furthering supranational elements transnational lists could be used in combination with the “Spitzenkandidaten process”. This would still require a “saut qualitatif” by the European party families.
Teilen