Die litauische Ratspräsidentschaft 2013: klein und effektiv

Ramūnas Vilpišauskas; Bruno Vandecasteele

doi:10.5771/0720-5120-2014-2-123

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- 95–151 Aufsätze 95–151
  - 95–108 Auf dem sicherheitspolitischen Auge blind: Die EU-Außenpolitik angesichts der Ukraine-Krise: Zustand und Entwicklungsoptionen Katrin Böttger Katrin Böttger 95–108
  - 109–122 Die italienische Ratspräsidentschaft 2014: Ambitionen und Schwerpunkte unter schwierigen Bedingungen Gianni Bonvicini, Ferdinando Nelli Feroci Gianni Bonvicini, Ferdinando Nelli Feroci 109–122
  - 123–137 Die litauische Ratspräsidentschaft 2013: klein und effektiv Ramūnas Vilpišauskas, Bruno Vandecasteele Ramūnas Vilpišauskas, Bruno Vandecasteele 123–137
  - 138–151 Vertragsentwicklung und Differenzierung in der europäischen Integration. Nationale Identität, staatliche Autonomie und die Entstehung einer Kern-Peripherie-Struktur in der Europäischen Union Thomas Winzen, Frank Schimmelfennig Thomas Winzen, Frank Schimmelfennig 138–151
- 152–171 Forum 152–171
  - 152–160 Die Europawahl 2014 und das Konzept der Spitzenkandidaten – ein Kommentar Daniel Göler, Mathias Jopp Daniel Göler, Mathias Jopp 152–160
  - 161–171 Über Europa. Betrachtungen zur aktuellen Situation und zur Zukunft der Europäischen Union José Manuel Durão Barroso José Manuel Durão Barroso 161–171
- 172–200 Arbeitskreis Europäische Integration 172–200
  - 172–191 Die Geschichte der deutschen Europawissenschaften im Arbeitskreis Europäische Integration Frédéric Krumbein Frédéric Krumbein 172–191
  - 192–200 Vielfalt ohne Einheit Frédéric Krumbein Frédéric Krumbein 192–200
- 201–202 Abstracts 201–202
  - Abstracts
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

integration , page 123 - 137

Die litauische Ratspräsidentschaft 2013: klein und effektiv

Autoren

Ramūnas Vilpišauskas Bruno Vandecasteele

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2014-2-123
- ISSN: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 2941-8895
Zusammenfassung

The Lithuanian Presidency of the Council of the EU in 2013 took place in a challenging period with two main deadlines: to finish as much legislative work as possible before the European elections, and to adopt the legislation required for the next Multiannual Financial Framework. This article begins with reviewing the preparatory process and the main priorities of the Lithuanian Presidency. Subsequently, it highlights three main achievements of this Presidency: the progress in the establishment of a banking union, the conclusion of the Multiannual Financial Framework and the EU’s relations with the Eastern Partnership countries. It then discusses the different roles played by Lithuania as a chair of the Council depending on national preferences, specific dossiers and stakeholders and decision-making rules. These roles include the general role of administrator, mediator in financial issues and political leader in relations with the Eastern Partnership countries. The paper concludes with several reflections on the potential long-term effects resulting from the Presidency on Lithuania’s administration and the country’s role in the EU.

Abstract

The Lithuanian Presidency of the Council of the EU in 2013 took place in a challenging period with two main deadlines: to finish as much legislative work as possible before the European elections, and to adopt the legislation required for the next Multiannual Financial Framework. This article begins with reviewing the preparatory process and the main priorities of the Lithuanian Presidency. Subsequently, it highlights three main achievements of this Presidency: the progress in the establishment of a banking union, the conclusion of the Multiannual Financial Framework and the EU’s relations with the Eastern Partnership countries. It then discusses the different roles played by Lithuania as a chair of the Council depending on national preferences, specific dossiers and stakeholders and decision-making rules. These roles include the general role of administrator, mediator in financial issues and political leader in relations with the Eastern Partnership countries. The paper concludes with several reflections on the potential long-term effects resulting from the Presidency on Lithuania’s administration and the country’s role in the EU.
Share