Selbstreflexiver Frieden – selbstreflexive Sicherheit?

Sabine Jaberg

doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2017-4-169

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- I–IV Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis I–IV
- 163–201 THEMENSCHWERPUNKT 163–201
  - 163–168 Selbstreflexivität – Begriff und Programm Gertrud Brücher Gertrud Brücher 163–168
  - 169–173 Selbstreflexiver Frieden – selbstreflexive Sicherheit? Sabine Jaberg Sabine Jaberg 169–173
  - 174–178 Friedensforschung als reflexive Wissenschaft Christoph Weller Christoph Weller 174–178
  - 179–184 Deutschland und das Gewaltverbot Michael Bothe Michael Bothe 179–184
  - 185–190 Die Bedeutung von Selbstreflexivität in der Rüstungsexportpolitik für die deutsche Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik Jan Grebe Jan Grebe 185–190
  - 191–195 Neoliberalismus und Unfrieden – eine Kritik der Wirtschafts- und Handelspolitik der EU Werner Ruf Werner Ruf 191–195
  - 196–201 Von Selbstreflexion zu Hegemonieselbstkritik Claudia Brunner Claudia Brunner 196–201
- 202–202 DOKUMENTATION 202–202
  - Nachruf für Reinhard Mutz
- 203–204 NEUERSCHEINUNGEN 203–204
- 204–207 BESPRECHUNGEN 204–207
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

S&F Sicherheit und Frieden , page 169 - 173

Selbstreflexiver Frieden – selbstreflexive Sicherheit?

Autoren

Sabine Jaberg

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2017-4-169
- ISSN: 0175-274X
- ISSN online: 0175-274x
Zusammenfassung

Peace and security are more or less synonyms. This opinion is often heard, but not true. Firstly, the history of concepts differs. Secondly, their immanent grammar or logic works contrarily: Peace is a social and inclusive idea that implies symmetrical patterns of relation, whereas security is an asocial and exclusive idea that tends to asymmetrical patterns of relation. Peace limits the ambitions of an actor, security does not. Peace excludes, security includes violent means as normal instruments. Therefore, people striving for peace will develop another epistemic attitude than people struggling for security. Usually, peace is more disposed to self-reflexivity than security is. But peace can lose its reflexive character, especially where it ends, whereas security can gain a reflexive moment, especially where existential problems cannot be solved without it. Nevertheless, the difference between both categories remains important: Peace prepares the way to self-reflexivity much better than security ever could.

Abstract

Peace and security are more or less synonyms. This opinion is often heard, but not true. Firstly, the history of concepts differs. Secondly, their immanent grammar or logic works contrarily: Peace is a social and inclusive idea that implies symmetrical patterns of relation, whereas security is an asocial and exclusive idea that tends to asymmetrical patterns of relation. Peace limits the ambitions of an actor, security does not. Peace excludes, security includes violent means as normal instruments. Therefore, people striving for peace will develop another epistemic attitude than people struggling for security. Usually, peace is more disposed to self-reflexivity than security is. But peace can lose its reflexive character, especially where it ends, whereas security can gain a reflexive moment, especially where existential problems cannot be solved without it. Nevertheless, the difference between both categories remains important: Peace prepares the way to self-reflexivity much better than security ever could.
Share