Positive Fault Requirements in EU Criminal Law

Juho Rankinen

doi:10.5771/2193-5505-2016-2-117

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- 113–114 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 113–114
- 115–116 Editorial 115–116
- 117–227 Articles 117–227
  - 117–142 Positive Fault Requirements in EU Criminal Law Juho Rankinen Juho Rankinen 117–142
  - 143–160 The Last Imperative of Criminal Policy: Nullum Crimen Sine Confiscatione Vittorio Manes Vittorio Manes 143–160
  - 161–185 The Legality Principle: An Effective Way to Minimise the European Prosecutors’ Influence on Substantive Criminalisation? Marie-Lena Marstaller Marie-Lena Marstaller 161–185
  - 186–210 Belgium and the European Arrest Warrant: Is European Criminal Cooperation Under Pressure? Michaël Meysman Michaël Meysman 186–210
  - 211–227 Res Judicata in Criminal Matters and the European Courts – A Comparison Between Germany and Italy (Part II) Anne Schneider Anne Schneider 211–227
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

EuCLR European Criminal Law Review , page 117 - 142

Positive Fault Requirements in EU Criminal Law

Autoren

Juho Rankinen

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2016-2-117
- ISSN: 2191-7442
- ISSN online: 2193-5505
Abstract

This essay endeavours to illustrate the existing system of positive fault requirements in EU criminal law. The suggested model is based on the present EU legislation, including preparatory works, and the essential case law of the CJEU. Despite certain significant obscurities, the EU legislator seems to have generated a relatively consistent way of providing legislation, concerning positive fault requirements. The outcome may be characterized as a continental system with certain Anglo-Saxon nuances. The broader aim of this essay is to participate in the discussion about the general part of EU criminal law. In this respect, the essay highlights certain disconcerting criminal political progressions in the field of positive fault requirements in EU criminal law.
Share