@article{2015:geiel:dialogorie,
title = {Dialogorientierte Beteiligungsverfahren: Wirkungsvolle oder sinnlose Innovationen? Das Beispiel Bürgerhaushalt},
year = {2015},
note = {The search for effective and legitimate will-formation and
decision-making is one of the main topics of political science .
Currently dialogue-oriented procedures of citizen-involve- ment are
often regarded as hope for the future - or as useless
‘window-dressing’ . The exam- ple ‘participatory budgeting in
Germany’ studied here proves that dialogue-oriented citi-
zen-involvement can be regarded both as useful and as useless -
depending on the criteria . From the perspective of democratic theory
as well as from the views of different actors in- volved in the
practice of participatory budgeting a preliminary framework for
analysis is discussed . The aim is not to provide a conclusive
evaluation of such procedures, but to provide a clarification,
refinement and advancement of a set of criteria . Such an advanced,
multidimensional set of criteria will enable future research to create
a ‘big picture evalua- tion’ by means of combining the currently
very fragmented evaluations with their incon- sistent criteria .
[ZParl, vol . 46, no . 1, pp . 151 - 165]},
journal = {ZParl Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen},
pages = {151--165},
author = {Geißel, Brigitte and Neunecker, Martina and Kolleck, Alma},
volume = {46},
number = {1}
}