27
denominate the former Russian provinces of Estonia, Livonia and Courland.40 Today,
the collective label of ‘Baltic States’ as the ‘Baltic Three’ is not always appreciated by
the concerning states themselves as it does not comply with their specific historical
consciousness and geopolitical self-identification.41
IV. Overview: The Geo-Political Terminology Used in this Study
As so many terminologies are in use to structure the region and denominate certain parts
of it, it seems important at this point, to clarify the terminology I am applying in the
course of this study.
Nordic Countries Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Iceland
Northern Europe European Russia, Northern Germany, Northern Poland,
Scandinavia, Baltic States
Scandinavia Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland
Scandinavian Baltic Sweden, Denmark and Finland
Baltic Sea States Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia,
Estonia, Russia, Finland
Baltic Sea Region Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, European Russia, Denmark,
Finland, Sweden, the German Länder of Berlin, Brandenburg,
Bremen, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Schleswig-Holstein,
Niedersachsen (Regierungsbezirk Lüneburg)42
Table 1: The Geo-Political Terminology Applied in this Study
B. Northern Europe – Some General Characteristics and Features
I. BSR Specificities and Sensitivities
In the last two decades, the geopolitical situation in the Baltic Sea area has changed
drastically. The most important break in recent BSR history was certainly the fall of the
east-west divide in 1989/90 – or as Sander called it – the “fall of the Baltic Wall”,
involving independence for the Baltic States, the reunification of Germany and the
conclusion of a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and Russia.43
As from a geostrategic point of view, the specific importance of the BSR has been
traditionally related to its unclear and therefore problematic Eastern delimitation.44
40 See MEDIJAINEN Eero: The Baltic Question in the Twentieth Century. Historiographic Aspects.
In: AMELANG James S./BEER Siegfried (eds): Public Power in Europe. Studies in Historical
Transformations. Pisa 2006, pp. 109-124, here p. 112.
41 See CAVE Andrew: Finding a Role in an Enlarged EU. In: Central Europe Review, Nr. 20. 22 May
2000. Online publication www.ce-review.org [26 November 2007]. See chapter “The Baltic States
and Baltic Unity – Imposition or Expedient?”, p. 67-.
42 This geographical definition of the BSR is also employed in the framework of EU structural
initiatives (e.g. INTERREG).
43 See SANDER Gordon: Off Centre. Baltic hands link across a troubled sea. In: Financial Times, 8
April 2000.
44 See DELLENBRANT Jan Åke: The Baltic Sea Co-operation. Visions and Realities. In:
BALDERSHEIM Harald/STÅHLBERG Krister (eds): Nordic Region-Building in a European
Perspective. Aldershot 1999, pp. 83-97, here p. 85.
Chapter Preview
References
Zusammenfassung
Seit 1989 ist es im Ostseeraum zu einer explosionsartigen Entstehung einer Vielzahl von regionalen Initiativen und Zusammenschlüssen gekommen. Der Ostseeraum weist bis heute eine europaweit einzigartig hohe Konzentration an kooperativen regionalen Strukturen auf. Diese bilden gemeinsam ein enges Netzwerk von Vereinigungen, die unter dem Überbegriff der "Ostseezusammenarbeit’ interagieren.
Diese Studie analysiert die Hintergründe dieses regionalen Phänomens oder so genannten „Ostsee-Rätsels“ auf Basis eines Vergleichs zwischen den Regionalpolitiken zweier staatlicher Schlüsselakteure, Schweden und Finnland, wobei der europäische Integrationsprozess als übergeordneter Bezugsrahmen für die Untersuchung dient.