Menschenrechte wider den Hunger

Steffen Kommer

doi:10.5771/9783845273945

Menschenrechte wider den Hunger

Das Recht auf Nahrung zwischen Wissenschaft, Politik und globalen Märkten

Reihe: Forum Umwelt-, Agrar- und Klimaschutzrecht

Band 7 1. Auflage 2016

CC-BY Vollzugriff

doi.org/10.5771/9783845273945
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-3007-0
ISBN online: 978-3-8452-7394-5
Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden

Jetzt lesen

Zusammenfassung

Welchen Beitrag kann das Recht auf Nahrung zur Überwindung der globalen Ernährungskrise leisten? Statt das Ziel einer hungerfreien Welt als Utopie abzutun, werden Menschenrechtsklagen als wirksame Instrumente beschrieben, um Diskurse über Ursachen von Nahrungsunsicherheit anzuregen und die Ergreifung notwendiger Anti-Hunger-Programme zu beschleunigen. Aufbauend auf der nationalen und internationalen Rechtsprechung zum „right to food“ werden drei Zugangsrechte entwickelt: das Recht auf soziale Fürsorge, das Recht auf ein ausreichendes Einkommen und das Recht auf Selbstversorgung.

Angesichts globaler Gefährdungslagen, die sich etwa in abrupt schwankenden Weltagrarpreisen sowie dem Klimawandel offenbaren, wird zudem eine transnationale Schutzdimension begründet. Die Bedeutung grenzüberschreitender Menschenrechtsdiskurse wird exemplarisch anhand von zwei Fallstudien zum Agrardumping und zur Förderung von Biokraftstoffen verdeutlicht.

Download PDF Jetzt lesen

Actionaid International (2012a): Fuel for though: Addressing the social impacts of EU biofuels policies, April.
(2012b): Biofuelling the global food crisis: why the EU must act at the G20.
(2010): Meals per gallon, the impact of industrial biofuels on people and global hunger. doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2010.146
(2005): Don´t Make Poverty. What the G8 Should Do to Make Poverty History. doi.org/10.1201/b13288-35
Ahmed, Tawhida & de Jesús Butler, Israel (2006): “The European Union and Human Rights: An International Law Perspective”. In: The European Journal of International Law Vol. 17, No. 4; S. 771-801. doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chl029
Alexy, Robert (1994): Theorie der Grundrechte, 1. Auflage, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Alston, Philip (1997): The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Manual on Human Rights Reporting, Under six major International Human Rights Instruments, Part II, HR/PUB/91/1 (Rev.1), Geneva: United Nations.
Alston, Philip (1997): The International Covenant on Economic (1987): “Out of the Abyss: the Challenges Confronting the new U.N. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights”. In: Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 3, S. 332-381.
Alston, Philip (1997): The International Covenant on Economic (1984): International Law and the Right to Food, in: ders. / Tomaševski (eds.), The Right to Food, Dordrecht: SIM, S. 8-68.Alston, Philip & Simma, Bruno (1987): “First Session of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights”. In: American Law Journal, Vol. 81, S. 747-756. doi.org/10.2307/2202031
Anseeuw, Ward / Boche, Mathieu / Breu, Thomas et al. (2012): Transnational Land Deals for Agriculture in the Global South, Analytical Report based on the Land Matrix, Number 1, The Land Matrix Partnership (CDE, CIRAD, GIGA, GIZ, ILC), abrufbar unter: <http://www.landcoalition.org/en/resources/transnational-land-deals-agriculture-global-south.>.
Aranha, Adriana (2010): Fome Zero: A Construção de uma Estratégia de Combate à Fome no Brasil, in: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome (ed.), Fome Zero. Uma História Brasileira, Brasília, Vol. 1, S. 74-95.
Auer, Claus (2010): “Global Partnership for Agriculture and Food Security: Actors, missions and achievements”. In: Rural 21 2010/05, S. 1-13.
Baffes John & de Gorter, Harry (2005): Experience with Decoupling Agricultural Support, in: Aksoy / Beghin (eds.), Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries, Washington D.C.: The World Bank, S. 75-90.
Bals, Christoph / Harmeling, Sven and Windfuhr, Michael (2008): Climate Change, Food Security and the Right to Food, Stuttgart: Diakonisches Werk der EKD e.V., abrufbar unter: <https://germanwatch.org/de/download/2798.pdf>.
Beuchelt, Tina D. & Virchow, Detlef (2012): “Food sovereignty or the human right to adequate food: which concept serves better as international development policy for global hunger and poverty reduction?”. In: Agriculture Human Values 29, S. 259-273. doi.org/10.1007/s10460-012-9355-0
Birchfield, Lauren & Corsi, Jessica (2010): “Between Starvation and Globalization: realizing the Right to Food in India”. In: Michigan Journal of International Law 31, S. 691-764.
Bittner, Claudia (2011): “Human Dignity as a Matter of Legislative Consistency in an Ideal World”. In: German Law Journal, Vol. 12, S. 1941-1960.
Bleckmann, Albert (1970): Begriff und Kriterien der innerstaatlichen Anwendbarkeit völkerrechtlicher Verträge, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Bowyer, Catherine (2010): Anticipated Indirect Land Use Change Associated with Expanded Use of Biofuels in the EU – An Analysis of Member State Performance, Institute for European Environmental Policy, abrufbar unter: <http://www.foeeurope.org/agrofuels/ILUC_report_November2010.pdf>.
Brenton, Paul & Ikezuki, Takako (2005): The Impact of Agricultural Trade Preferences, with particular Attention to the Least-Developed Countries, in: Aksoy/Beghin (eds.), Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries, Washington D.C.: The World Bank, S. 55-74.
Brot für die Welt, FIAN, Gegenströmung et al. (2011): Extraterritorial State Obligations. Parallel report in response to the 5th Periodic Report of the Federal Republic of Germany on the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, March, abrufbar unter: <http://www.institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PDF-Dateien/Pakte_Konventionen/ICESCR/icescr_state_report_germany_5_2008_parallel_EKD_FIAN_en.pdf.>.
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (2011): Wissenschaft, Politik und Verfassungsgericht, Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Bundeskartellamt (2014): Sektoruntersuchung Lebensmitteleinzelhandel, Bericht, September.
Bundeskartellamt (2012): Sektoruntersuchung Milch. Endbericht, Januar. doi.org/10.1142/S2010194512005181
Bundeskartellamt (2009): Sektoruntersuchung Milch. Zwischenbericht, Dezember.
Cafiero, Carlo (2012): What do we really know about food security? September, FAO Working Paper.
Choplin, Gérad / Strickner, Alexandra und Trouvé, Aurélie (2011): Ernährungssouveränität. Für eine andere Agrar- und Lebensmittelpolitik in Europa, Wien: Mandelbaum Verlag.
Cleveland, Sarah H. (2013): “Commentary on Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum. The Kiobel Presumption and Extraterritoriality”. In: 52 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 8, S. 8-27.
Cloots, Ann Sofie (2011): Biofuels and the Right to Food: An Uneasy Partnership, in: Cordes / de Schutter (eds.), Accounting for Hunger, Oxford-Portland: OR, Hart Publishing, S. 95-134.
Coomans, Fons (2011): “The Extraterritorial Scope of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Work of the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights”. In: Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 11, S. 1-35. doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngq055
Cordell, Dana (2010): The story of phosphorus: Sustainability implications of global phosphorus scarcity for food security, Linköping Studies in Arts and Science No. 509, Linköping: University Linköping, abrufbar unter: <http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A291760&dswid=1072>.
Cordes, Kaitlin Y. (2011): The Impact of Agribusiness Transnational Corporations on the Right to Food, in: dies. / de Schutter (eds.), Accounting for Hunger, Oxford-Portland: OR, Hart Publishing, S. 27-64.
Cororaton, Caesar B. &. Timilsina, Govinda R. (2012): Impacts of Large-Scale Expansion of Biofuels on Global Poverty and Income Distribution, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6078, abrufbar unter: <http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-6078>. doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6078
Cotula, Lorenzo (2014): Adressing Human Rights Aspects of “Land Grabbing”. European Union, EXPO/B/DROI/2014/06, abrufbar unter: <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2014/534984/EXPO_STU(2014)534984_EN.pdf.>.
Cotula, Lorenzo / Djiré, Moussa and Tenga, Ringo W. (2008): The Right to Food and Access to Natural Resources, Right to Food Studies, Rome: FAO, abrufbar unter: <http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/k8093e/k8093e.pdf.>.
Cotula, Lorenzo / Vermeulen, Sonja / Leonard, Rebeca and Keeley, James (2009): Land Grab or Development Opportunity? Agricultural Investment and International Land Deals in Africa, Rome: IIED/FAO/IFAD, abrufbar unter: <http://www.fao.org/3/a-ak241e.pdf.>.
Courtis, Christian & Sepúlveda, Magdalena (2009): “Are Extra-Territorial Obligations Reviewable under the Optional Protocol to the ICESCR?”. In: Nordisk Tidsskrift for Menneskerettigheter 27, Nr. 1, S. 54-63.
Cowan Schmidt, Margaret (2011): The Transformation of Food Retail and Marginalisation of Smallholder Farmers, in: Cordes / de Schutter (eds.), Accounting for Hunger, Oxford-Portland: OR, Hart Publishing, S. 65-94.
Craven, C. R. Matthew (2002): The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. A perspective on its development, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Craven, C. R. Matthew (2002): The International Covenant on Economic (1993): “The Domestic Application of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights”. In: Netherlands International Law Review, 40, S. 367-404. doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00009633
D´Àvila Lopes, Ana Maria & Mont´Alverne B. L., Martonio (2011): „Der Fall Raposa Serra Do Sol“. In: Verfassung und Recht in Übersee 3, S. 364-380. doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2011-3-364
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren, in: Gusy (Hrsg.), Grundrechtsmonitoring. Chancen und Grenzen außergerichtlichen Menschenrechtsschutzes, Baden-Baden: Nomos, S. 238-264. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
De Schutter, Olivier (2014): Final Report: The transformative potential of the right to food, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, 24 January, A/HRC/25/57.
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2013): Note on the Impacts of the EU Biofuels Policy on the Right to Food, Statement based upon letter sent to EU institutions, 16 April. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2011a): International Trade in Agriculture and the Right to Food, Cordes / ders. (eds.), Accounting for Hunger, Oxford-Portland OR, Hart Publishing, S. 137-192.
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2011b): Mission to Madagascar. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, A/HRC/19/59/Add.4, 26 December. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2011c) Guiding principles on human rights impact assessments of trade and investment agreements, A/HRC/19/59/Add.5, 19 December. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2010d): Addressing Concentration in Food Supply Chains. The Role of Competition Law in Tackling the Abuse of Buyer Power. Briefing Note 03, December. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2010a): Missão ao Brasil. Relatório do Relator Especial sobre o direito à alimentação, A/HRC/13/33/Add.6. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2010b): Report on Access to land and security of tenure, Special Rapporteur on the right to food, August, A/65/281. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2010c): “The Emerging Human Right to Land”, In: International Community Law Review, Vol. 12, Issue 3, S. 303-334.
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2009a): Agribusiness and the right to food, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, 22 December, A/HRC/13/33. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2009b): Mission to the World Trade Organization, February, A/HRC/10/5/Add.2. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2009c): International Trade in Agriculture and the Right to Food, Occasional Paper, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Geneva. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2009d): Large-scale Land Acquisitions and Leases: A Set of Minimum Principles and Measures to Address the Human Rights Challenge. A Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, A/HRC/13/33/Add.2, 28 December. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
Davy, Ulrike (2011): Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren (2008): Building Resilience: A Human Rights Framework for World Food and Nutrition Security. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, A/HRC/9/23, September. doi.org/10.5771/9783845230337-238
De Schutter, Olivier / Eide, Asbjorn and Khalfan, Ashfaq et al. (2012): “Commentary to the Maastricht Principles”. In: Human Rights Quartely 34, S. 1084–1169.
Deininger, Klaus & Byerlee, Derek et al. (2011): Rising Global Interest in Farmland: can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits?, Washington DC: The World Bank, abrufbar unter: <http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978-0-8213-8591-3>. doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8591-3
Dennis, Michael J. & Stewart, David P. (2004): “Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Should There be an International Complaints Mechanism to Adjudicate the Rights to Food, Water, Housing, and Health?“. In: The American Society of International Law 98, S. 462-515. doi.org/10.2307/3181641
Diop, Demba / Blanco, Maria / Flammini, Alessandro et al. (2013): Assessing the Impact of Biofuels Production on Developing Countries from the Point of View of Policy, AETS publication, February, abrufbar unter: <http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/assessing-impact-biofuels-production-developing-countries-point-view-policy-coherence-development_en>.
Dowell-Jones, Mary (2004): Contextualizing the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: assessing the economic deficit, International studies in human rights, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Duchstein, Michael (2010): Das internationale Benchmarkingverfahren und seine Bedeutung für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz, Springer: Berlin. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12018-3_5
Eckardt, Felix & Hyla, Anna (2010): „Menschenrechte, Welthandel und das Recht auf Nahrung“. In: Zeitschrift für Menschenrechte 4, Nr. 2, S. 73-97.
Ecofys, Frauenhofer, BBH, EGG, Winrock International (2012): Renewable Energy Progress and Biofuels Sustainability, Report prepared for the European Commission, Tender No. ENER/C1/463-2011-Lot2, abrufbar unter: <http://www.etrera2020.eu/library/35-energy/renewable-energy/63-renewable-energy-progress-and-biofuels-sustainability.html>.
Econexus (2007): Call for an Immediate Moratorium on EU Incentives for Agrofuels, EU imports of Agrofuels and Agroenergy Monocultures, abrufbar unter: <http://www.econexus.info/call-immediate-moratorium-eu-incentives-agrofuels-eu-imports-agrofuels-and-eu-agroenergy-monocultur-0>.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food, Hospes / Hadiprayitno (eds.), Governing food security. Law, politics and the right to food, Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, S. 105-135.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2008): The Right to Food and the Impact of Liquid Biofuels (Agrofuels), FAO Right to Food Studies, Rome: FAO.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (1987): The Right to Food as a Human Right, E/CN.4/Sub.2/1987/23.
EuropAfrica (2011): (Bio)Fuelling Injustice? Europe’s responsibility to counter climate change without provoking land grabbing and compounding food insecurity in Africa, abrufbar unter: <http://www.europafrica.info/en/publications/biofueling-injustice>.
Europäisches Parlament (2008): Stellungnahme des Ausschusses für Umweltfragen, Volksgesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, v. 15. Juli, 2008/0016 (COD).
European Commission (2014a): State of play on the sustainability of solid and gaseous biomass used for electricity, heating and cooling in the EU, Brussels, 28.7.2014, SWD(2014) 259 final, Annex 1 (S. 28).
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2014b): A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 up to 2030, Brussels, SWD(2014) 15 final.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2013a), Bericht der EU über Politikkohärenz im Interesse der Entwicklung, 31.10, SWD (2013) 456 final, S. 125.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2013b): Fortschrittsbericht „Erneuerbare Energien“, Brüssel, v. 27.3.2013, COM(2013) 175 final.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2013c): Evolution of the sugar imports in the European Union from LDC and ACP countries, v. 31.05, COM(2013) 323 final.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2012a): Renewable Energy: A Major Player in the European Energy Market, communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions, June.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2012b): Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/70/EC and Directive 2009/28/EC, SWD(2012) 343 final.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2012c): Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment, 17 October, SWB(2012) 343final.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2011a): From farm to fork statistics, Eurostat Pocketbocks.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2011b): Recent progress in developing renewable energy sources, Brussels, SEC(2011) 130 final.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2011c): Impact Assessment, Annex 12 - The Common Agricultural Policy towards and Development, SEC(2011) 1153 final/2, 20. October.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2008): Annex of the Impact Assessment: Document accompanying the Package of Implementation measures for the EU’s objectives on climate change and renewable energy for 2020, SEC(2008) 85, VOL. II, 143.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2007): The impact of a minimum 10% obligation for biofuel use in the EU-27 in 2020 on agricultural markets, 30 April, AGRI G-2/WM D(2007).
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2006): Biofuels in the European Union: A Vision for 2030 and Beyond, Final Report of the Biofuels Research Advisory Council.
Europäischer Rechnungshof (2010): Hat die Zuckermarktreform ihre wichtigsten Ziele erreicht? Sonderbericht Nr. 6, Luxemburg, abrufbar unter: <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_ECA-10-30_de.htm.>.
Eurostat (2015): Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics, 2014 edition, abrufbar unter: <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/de/web/products-statistical-books/-/KS-FK-14-001>.
Eide, Asbjørn (2010): State obligations for human rights: the case of the right to food (2012): Agriculture, fishery and forestry statistics, Main results – 2010-11, abrufbar unter: <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/de/web/products-pocketbooks/-/KS-FK-12-001>.
Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst und Brot für die Welt (2013): Die Reform der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik der Europäischen Union, Lobbybrief 3: Verhinderung von Dumping, abrufbar unter: <http://www.meine-landwirtschaft.de/>.
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Food and Agriculture Organization (2014): Crop Prospects and Food Situation, No. 2, July.
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2013): Statistical Yearbook: World Food and Agriculture. doi.org/10.1093/0198296754.001.0001
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2012a): The State of Food Insecurity in the World, Technical note FAO methodology to estimate the prevalence of Undernourishment, Rome, October.
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2012b): Statistical Yearbook: World Food and Agriculture doi.org/10.1093/0198296754.001.0001
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2011a): State of Food and Agriculture: Women in agriculture. Closing the Gender Gap for Development, Rome.
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2011b): Save and Grow. A policymaker’s guide to the sustainable intensification of smallholder crop production. Rome.
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2011c): The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture (SOLAW) – Managing systems at risk, Rome and Earthscan, London.
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2011d), Agricultural Import Surges in Developing Countries. Analytical framework and insights from case studies, Rome,
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2010): The State of Food Insecurity in the World, Addressing food insecurity in protracted crises, Rome.
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2008a): The Right to Food and Indigenous Peoples, Joint Brief, Rome and New York. doi.org/10.1093/0198296754.001.0001
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2008b): The State of Food Insecurity in the World: High food prices and food security – threats and opportunities, Rome.
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2007a): Climate Change and Food Security: A Framework Document, Rome.
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2007b): Right to Food: Lessons learned in Brazil. doi.org/10.1093/0198296754.001.0001
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2006a): Fact Sheet Food Security, June, FAO Policy Brief, Issue 2. doi.org/10.1093/0198296754.001.0001
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2006b): Prospects for food, nutrition, Interim report. doi.org/10.1093/0198296754.001.0001
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2006c): Brief on Import Surges – Issues, October. doi.org/10.1093/0198296754.001.0001
Fabre, Cécile (2000): Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the decent life (2003), Trade Reforms and Food Security: Conceptualizing the Linkages. doi.org/10.1093/0198296754.001.0001
Fabre, Cécile (2000