Jump to content
Reparation in Transitional Justice / Conclusion – Pushing the Limits of the Law
Reparation in Transitional Justice / Conclusion – Pushing the Limits of the Law
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Page
1–26
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–26
Details
27–42
Introduction – The Limits of the Law
27–42
Details
A. The Modesty of the Law
B. Delimitation of the Topic
C. Terminology
D. Outline
43–84
Chapter 1 – The International Law on Reparation
43–84
Details
A. The Existence of a Right to Reparation
I. International Human Rights Law
II. International Humanitarian Law
III. International Criminal Law
B. Beneficiaries of the Right to Reparation
I. Direct Survivors
II. Indirect Survivors
III. Survivors of Violations Committed by Non-State Actors
C. Content of the Right to Reparation
I. Restitution
II. Compensation
III. Satisfaction
IV. Rehabilitation
V. Guarantees of Non-Repetition
VI. The Relation Between the Different Forms of Reparation
VII. Collective Reparation
D. Limits of the Right to Reparation
E. The Theoretical Foundation of the International Law on Reparation
F. Summary: The International Law on Reparation
85–202
Chapter 2 – Case Studies
85–202
Details
A. Introduction
I. Case Selection
II. Methodological Reflections
B. Sierra Leone
I. The History of Sierra Leone’s Internal Conflict
II. Human Rights Violations and Harms in the Conflict
III. Sierra Leone’s Transitional Justice Effort
IV. Sierra Leone’s Reparation Effort
1. The Recommendations of the Sierra Leone Truth and Reconciliation Commission
a. Framework
b. Reparation Recommendations
2. Implementation
a. Initiation and Registration
b. Interim-Relief
c. Rehabilitation Grants
d. Additional Measures
3. Challenges and Criticism
C. Colombia
I. The History of the Colombian Conflict
II. Human Rights Violations and Harms in the Conflict
III. Colombia’s Transitional Justice Effort
IV. Colombia’s Reparation Effort
1. Eligibility
2. Registration
3. The Individual Route
a. Restitution
b. Compensation
c. Rehabilitation
d. Satisfaction
e. Guarantees of Non-Repetition
4. The Collective Route
5. Challenges and Criticism
D. The International Criminal Court
I. Comparability and Methodology
II. The Reparation System of the International Criminal Court
III. The Reparation Programs of the International Criminal Court
1. General Principles
2. The Lubanga Reparation Program
a. Case and Harm
b. Reparation Efforts
aa. Program Entry
bb. Symbolic Reparation
cc. Service-Based Reparation
3. The Katanga Reparation Program
a. Case and Harm
b. Reparation Efforts
aa. Eligibility
bb. Reparation Measures
cc. Intake
4. The Al Mahdi Reparation Program
a. Case and Harm
b. Reparation Efforts
aa. Intake
bb. Individual Reparation
cc. Collective Reparation
5. The Ntaganda Reparation Program
a. Case and Harm
b. Reparation Efforts
aa. Intake
bb. Reparation Measures
IV. Critique and Challenges
E. Summary: Common Differences
I. A Different Goal
II. A Different Structure
1. Administrative vs. Judicial Reparation
2. Categorization and Generalization
III. Intake
1. Eligibility
2. Access
IV. Different Content
F. Conclusion
203–242
Chapter 3 – Theoretical Framework
203–242
Details
A. Defining Transitional Justice
I. Justice
II. Transition
1. The Erosion of Trust
a. Horizontal Trust
b. Vertical Trust
2. Restoring Trust
III. Conclusion: A Vague Definition of Transitional Justice
IV. Challenges
B. The Role(s) of Reparation in Transitional Justice
I. The Deontological and Instrumental Role of Reparation
II. The Relationship Between the Roles
III. Summary: The Purposes of Reparation in Transitional Justice
C. The Instrumental Role of Reparation
I. The Theoretical Basis: Symbolic Interactionism
II. The Role of the State in the Symbolic Interactionist Framework
1. Objects of State Communication
2. Content of State Communication
III. The Role of Reparation in the Symbolic Interactionist Framework
1. Reparation’s Message
2. Reparation’s Influence
IV. Summary
V. Challenges
D. Summary: The Purposes of Reparation in Transitional Justice
243–356
Chapter 4 – A Normative Framework for Reparation in Transitional Justice
243–356
Details
A. Introduction: What Tool to Use?
I. Seeking New Standards
II. Necessity and State of Emergency
III. The Limits of Interpretation
B. Interpretation and Transitional Justice: Methodological Aspects
I. Object and Purpose: The Transformative Goal of Reparation
II. Normative Environment
1. Systemic Integration
2. Resolving Normative Conflict
a. Limiting the Right to Reparation
b. The Role of Balancing
c. Inviolable Cores?
d. Summary
III. Discretion and Deference
IV. Summary: A Tripartite Approach
C. Survivor Eligibility
I. Excluding Rights
II. Excluding Persons
1. Survivor-Perpetrators
2. Indirect Survivors
III. Excluding Dates
IV. A Necessary Restriction?
V. A Restriction Based on State Practice?
VI. Conclusion: An Illegal Bottleneck
D. Intake
I. Outreach
II. Evidence
III. Removing Barriers
E. Content of Reparation Programs
I. Defending Full Reparation
II. Input: Setting the Financial Scope of the Program
1. Raising Resources
2. Enlisting External Support
a. Funding the Program
b. Running the Program
3. Efficiency: Seeking Synergies
4. Broad Balancing
a. Time
b. The Right to Reparation
c. Competing Rights and Interests
aa. Positive Human Rights Obligations
bb. Negative Human Rights Obligations
cc. State Interests
5. Summary
6. Challenges
III. Distribution: Breaking Down the Scope of the Program
IV. Output: Devising Adequate Reparation Measures
1. Applying Full Reparation in Transitional Justice
2. The Residual Function of Satisfaction
a. Defining Satisfaction
b. Satisfaction’s Role in Transitional Justice
3. Summary
4. Challenges
F. Procedure
I. Prioritization
II. Participation
III. Due Process
G. Structure
I. An Obligation to Create a Special Mechanism?
II. The Role of the Judiciary
1. The Relationship Between Special Reparation Mechanisms and the National Judiciary
2. Standards for Adjudication
a. Business as Usual: Tort Standards
b. Keeping up With the Times: Transitional Justice Standards
III. Summary
H. The End
I. Application Deadlines
II. End-Dates
I. Summary: A Normative Framework for Reparation in Transitional Justice
357–366
Conclusion – Pushing the Limits of the Law
357–366
Details
A. A True Observation
B. A Justified Suspicion?
C. Abandoning the Law?
D. One More (and Last) Time: The Limits of the Law
E. Overcoming the Blind Spots of Transitional Justice
F. Overcoming the Limits of the Law: Survivor Participation
G. In the end…
367–370
Table of Legislation and Treaties
367–370
Details
371–392
Table of Cases
371–392
Details
393–394
Table of Interviews
393–394
Details
395–443
Bibliography
395–443
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY
Access
Reparation in Transitional Justice , page 357 - 366
Conclusion – Pushing the Limits of the Law
Autoren
Fin-Jasper Langmack
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748938828-357
ISBN print: 978-3-7560-0526-0
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-3882-8
Share
Download PDF
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748938828-357
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
