Jump to content
Conventionality Control of Domestic Law / Permanent Court of International Justice / International Court of Justice
Conventionality Control of Domestic Law / Permanent Court of International Justice / International Court of Justice
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Page
1–16
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–16
Details
17–38
Introduction
17–38
17–27
1. Research Problems
17–27
Details
A. Systemic Human Rights Violations Caused by Unconventionality of Domestic Law
Details
B. Conventionality Control of Domestic Law
Details
28–38
2. Research Materials and Frameworks
28–38
Details
A. International and Constitutional Adjudications in Europe and Latin America
Details
B. Conventionality Control Parameters and Powers
Details
39–104
Part I Constitutionalised International Adjudication
39–104
39–70
Chapter 1 Interpretation of Conventionality Control Parameters
39–70
Details
1. Relationship between Regional Conventions and Universal Standards
Details
A. Evolutionary Interpretation of Regional Conventions
Details
(i) Evolutionary Interpretation of Living Instruments
Details
(ii) Regional Consensus
Details
B. Interpreting Regional Conventions Through Universal Standards
Details
(i) Evolutionary Interpretation through Universal Standards
Details
(ii) Universal Consensus
Details
2. Pro Homine Principle’s International Functions for Conventionality Control
Details
A. Unified Interpretation of Conventionality Control Parameters
Details
(i) Unification through Interpretative Rules
Details
(ii) Unification by Prioritising Most Favourable Standards
Details
B. Diversified Interpretation of Conventionality Control Parameters
Details
(i) Diversification through Interpretative Rules
Details
(ii) Diversification by Prioritising Most Favourble Standards
Details
71–104
Chapter 2 International Distribution of Conventionality Control Powers
71–104
Details
1. Relationship between Regional and Domestic Courts
Details
A. Distributing Powers for Domestic Courts
Details
(i) Negative Subsidiarity for Allocating Powers to Domestic Courts
Details
(ii) Granting Margin of Appreciation to Domestic Courts
Details
B. Distributing Powers to Regional Courts
Details
(i) Positive Subsidiarity for Allocating Powers to Regional Courts
Details
(ii) Restricting Margin of Appreciation by Regional Courts
Details
2. International Centralisation and Decentralisation of Conventionality Control Powers
Details
A. Centralising Conventionality Control Powers to Regional Courts
Details
(i) Prescribing Remedies for Systemic Violations
Details
(ii) Identifying Organs Responsible for Systemic Violations
Details
B. Decentralising Conventionality Control Powers to Domestic Courts
Details
(i) Margin of Appreciation in Conventionality Control
Details
(ii) Deference to Domestic Margin of Appreciation
Details
105–208
Part II Internationalised Constitutional Adjudication
105–208
105–154
Chapter 1 Application of Conventionality Control Parameters
105–154
Details
1. Relationship between Regional Conventions and National Constitutions
Details
A. Supremacy of Regional Conventions over National Constitutions
Details
(i) Incorporating Regional Conventions through National Constitutions
Details
(ii) Regional Courts Decisions in National Constitutions
Details
B. Supremacy of National Constitutions over Regional Conventions
Details
(i) Consubstantial Constitutional Contestations against Regional Conventions
Details
(ii) Sovereigntist Constitutional Contestations against Regional Conventions
Details
2. Pro Homine Principle’s Domestic Functions for Conventionality Control
Details
A. Unified Application of Conventionality Control Parameters
Details
(i) Sword Function for Regional Conventions against National Constitutions
Details
(ii) Relativising Absolute Protections of Constitutional Rights by Regional Conventions
Details
B. Diversified Application of Conventionality Control Parameters
Details
(i) Shield Function for National Constitutions against Regional Conventions
Details
(ii) Relativising Absolute Protections of Conventional Rights by National Constitutions
Details
155–194
Chapter 2 Domestic Distribution of Conventionality Control Powers
155–194
Details
1. Relationship between Constitutional and Ordinary Courts
Details
A. Power Distribution for Ordinary Courts
Details
(i) Consistent Interpretation of Legislation with National Constitutions
Details
(ii) Disapplication of Legislation Inconsistent with Community Law
Details
B. Power Distribution to Constitutional Courts
Details
(i) Individual Complaint Procedures
Details
(ii) Rules Prioritising Constitutional Procedures over Community Law Procedures
Details
2. Domestic Centralisation and Decentralisation of Conventionality Control Powers
Details
A. Decentralising Conventionality Control Powers to Ordinary Courts
Details
(i) Disapplying Legislation Incompatible with Regional Conventions
Details
(ii) Interpreting Legislation in Consistency with Regional Conventions
Details
B. Centralising Conventionality Control Powers to Constitutional Courts
Details
(i) Democracy: Balancing Individual Autonomy and Public Autonomy
Details
(ii) Legal Certainty: Balancing Predictability and Acceptability
Details
195–208
Conclusion
195–208
Details
1. Reconstructing Pyramid
Details
A. Pyramid Model: Closedness, Formalism and State-Centrism
Details
B. Reconciling Constitutionalism and Legal Pluralism Beyond the State
Details
2. Constructing a Trapezium
Details
A. Trapezium Model: Openness, Substantivism and Human-centrism
Details
B. Uni/Diversified Parameters and De/Centralised Powers of Conventionality Control
Details
209–252
Bibliography
209–252
209–209
Permanent Court of International Justice / International Court of Justice
209–209
Details
209–209
Human Rights Committee
209–209
Details
210–213
Council of Europe
210–213
Details
[Judgments, Decisions and Opinions of the European Court of Human Rights]
Details
[Others]
Details
214–218
Organization of American States
214–218
Details
[Advisory Opinion of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Series A)]
Details
[Judgements of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Series C)]
Details
[Others]
Details
219–219
Court of Justice of the European Union
219–219
Details
219–223
National Practices
219–223
Details
[Argentine]
Details
[Austria]
Details
[Belgium]
Details
[Bolivia]
Details
[Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Details
[Brasil]
Details
[Chile]
Details
[Colombia]
Details
[Costa Rica]
Details
[Dominican Republic]
Details
[Ecudador]
Details
[El Salvador]
Details
[Germany]
Details
[France]
Details
[Honduras]
Details
[Hungary]
Details
[Italy]
Details
[Malawi]
Details
[Mexico]
Details
[Peru]
Details
[Poland]
Details
[Russia]
Details
[South Africa]
Details
[Spain]
Details
[The Netherlands]
Details
[The United Kingdom]
Details
[Uruguay]
Details
[Venezuela]
Details
224–224
Miscellaneous
224–224
Details
225–252
Literature
225–252
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY
Access
Conventionality Control of Domestic Law , page 209 - 209
Permanent Court of International Justice / International Court of Justice
Autoren
Yota Negishi
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748929833-209
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-8562-9
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-2983-3
Chapter Preview
Chapter Preview
Share
Current chapter
Complete document
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748929833-209
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
