Jump to content
The Law between Objectivity and Power / § 16 The Citizenship Duality
The Law between Objectivity and Power / § 16 The Citizenship Duality
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Authors
Page
1–16
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–16
Details
19–98
Part 1: Introduction
19–98
§ 1 Ways of Thinking about Objectivity
Philip M. Bender
Philip M. Bender
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Productional and Applicational Objectivity
Details
1. Productional objectivity
Details
a. The irrelevance of positivism
Details
b. Three modes of achieving objectivity
Details
aa. Observational mode of thought
Details
bb. Deontological mode of thought
Details
cc. Consequentialist mode of thought
Details
c. Three modes of dealing with subjectivity
Details
aa. Decisionist mode of thought
Details
bb. Procedural mode of thought
Details
cc. Critical mode of thought
Details
d. Parallels in private lawmaking
Details
aa. Objectivist approaches to contract law
Details
bb. Subjectivist approaches to contract law
Details
cc. The objectivist dimension of private autonomy in heteronomous lawmaking
Details
2. Applicational objectivity
Details
a. Subjectivity and objectivity in interpretation
Details
b. Permutations of objectivity and subjectivity in adjudication
Details
aa. Productional subjectivity and applicational objectivity (‘Subjectivists’)
Details
bb. Productional objectivity and applicational objectivity (‘Objectivists’)
Details
cc. Productional subjectivity and applicational subjectivity (‘full nihilists’)
Details
dd. Productional objectivity and applicational subjectivity (‘partial nihilists’)
Details
c. Parallels in private lawmaking
Details
III. Why and How to Think about Objectivity
Details
1. Relativity of legitimacy
Details
a. The meaning of legitimacy and its connection to objectivity
Details
b. The criterion of legitimacy and its connection to objectivity
Details
c. A field-specific approach
Details
aa. Field-specificity and empirical legitimacy
Details
bb. Field-specificity and normative legitimacy
Details
2. Constitutional Pragmatism
Details
a. The Pragmatic leg of Constitutional Pragmatism
Details
aa. Three core aspects of philosophical Pragmatism
Details
bb. The different perspective of pragmatic adjudication
Details
b. The constitutional leg of Constitutional Pragmatism
Details
aa. Pragmatism and the constitution intertwined
Details
bb. Epistemological statements of the constitution
Details
(1) Epistemological statements on the productional level
Details
(2) Epistemological statements on the applicational level
Details
IV. Structural Objectivity
Details
1. Structuralism
Details
2. Developing the notion of structural objectivity
Details
a. Distinctness
Details
b. Unconsciousness and necessity
Details
c. Relations
Details
aa. Form and substance: bundle-structures I
Details
bb. Substance and substance: bundle-structures II
Details
cc. Thought-structures
Details
dd. Reception-structures
Details
3. Parallels in private lawmaking
Details
4. Why to think about structural objectivity
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
101–144
Part 2: Objectivity and Legal Interpretation
101–144
101–110
§ 2 Subjectivism, Objectivism, and Intuitionism in Legal Reasoning: Avoiding the Pseudos
Hans Christoph Grigoleit
Hans Christoph Grigoleit
101–110
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Underlying Contextual Assumptions
Details
1. Distinguishing reference points of subjectivism, objectivism, and intuitionism
Details
2. The postulate of methodical accuracy – avoiding ‘pseudo-subjectivism’
Details
III. Subjectivism vs Objectivism in Private Law: Referring Legal Solutions to the Parties’ Intentions
Details
IV. Dealing with ‘Authoritative’ Legal Sources – The Legislator’s Intention vs Objectivism
Details
1. General perspective: dependence of the legislator’s intention on fairness and reason
Details
2. Details: why the legislator’s intention depends upon objective standards
Details
a. The personal soft spot
Details
b. The lingual soft spot
Details
c. The dynamic dimension soft spot
Details
3. Impossibility of complete legislative pre-determination by ‘authoritative’ legal sources
Details
4. The legitimacy of correcting the legislator’s intention on the application/court level
Details
V. Objectivism vs Intuitionism (Psychologism, Ideologism, Historicism etc)
Details
1. Tendency to overstate the uncertainty issue
Details
2. Intersubjective reliability as ‘first degree objectivity’ of legal reasoning
Details
3. Framing intuition as ‘second degree objectivity’ of legal reasoning
Details
111–144
§ 3 Historical Arguments, Dynamic Interpretation, and Objectivity: Reconciling Three Conflicting Concepts in Legal Reasoning
Franz Bauer
Franz Bauer
111–144
Details
I. Conceptual Clarifications
Details
1. Historical arguments
Details
2. Dynamic interpretation
Details
3. Objectivity
Details
II. Historical Arguments and Objectivity
Details
1. The problem of objectivity
Details
2. The practical problem: the availability of historical evidence
Details
3. Theoretical problems: will and form
Details
4. Objectivity attenuated
Details
III. Dynamic Interpretation and Objectivity
Details
IV. Historical Arguments and Dynamic Interpretation
Details
1. The impermissibility of ‘direct’ historical argumentation
Details
2. Meaning and purpose: two types of legislative intent
Details
3. The interplay between different legislative intentions
Details
a. Multiple purposes and the presumption in favour of meaning
Details
b. Interconnected purposes and the presumption in favour of the lower level
Details
4. The dynamic potential of historical arguments
Details
a. Specific purposes
Details
b. Supplementary purposes
Details
c. Dynamic interpretation beyond historical arguments
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
147–192
Part 3: Objectivity and Constitutional Law
147–192
147–162
§ 4 The Law between Objectivity and Power from the Perspective of Constitutional Adjudication
Peter M. Huber
Peter M. Huber
147–162
Details
I. The Judiciary between the Rule of Law and Democracy
Details
1. Historical overview
Details
2. Two pillars of the Constitution
Details
a. General observations
Details
b. The judiciary between rule of law and democracy
Details
II. Jurisprudence and Power
Details
1. General remarks
Details
2. The Bundesverfassungsgericht and Power
Details
III. Objectivity and Dogmatics
Details
1. Dogmatics as a tool to reduce judicial power
Details
2. Constitutional adjudication, special techniques, and case law
Details
IV. The Bundesverfassungsgericht as a Constitutional Organ
Details
163–192
§ 5 Conceptual and Jurisprudential Foundations of the Debate on Interpretive Methodology in Constitutional Law: An Argument for More Analytical Rigor
Daniel Wolff
Daniel Wolff
163–192
Details
I. Introduction
Details
1. Preliminary no 1: why we should care
Details
2. Preliminary no 2: some assumptions
Details
3. Preliminary no 3: a brief summary of today’s originalism
Details
II. Conceptual Clarifications: Theories of Law, Theories of Interpretation, and Theories of Adjudication
Details
III. Jurisprudential Reflections: Originalism is Not and Cannot be a Combination of Legal Positivism and Formalism
Details
1. Legal positivism
Details
2. Legal formalism
Details
a. The core of the theory: decision-making (only) according to rules
Details
b. The three key claims of formalism
Details
3. The case against the compatibility of legal positivism with formalism
Details
4. Conclusion
Details
IV. Reconstructing the Great Methodological Debate with the Help of the Conceptual Distinctions and Jurisprudential Insights Identified
Details
1. Theories of constitutional law: what does American constitutional law consist of?
Details
2. Theories of legal interpretation: how to determine the content of American constitutional law?
Details
3. Theories of adjudication: how must courts resolve constitutional disputes?
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
195–270
Part 4: Objectivity and Private Law
195–270
195–222
§ 6 The Role for Remedial Discretion in Private Law Adjudication
Ben Köhler
Ben Köhler
195–222
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Remedies, Discretion, and System-building: Some Classifications
Details
III. ‘Remedial’ Discretion: Some Comparative Observations
Details
1. Remedial discretion in English law
Details
a. Remedial discretion in equitable remedies
Details
b. Statutory discretion
Details
c. Remedial constructive trusts and ‘discretionary remedialism’
Details
2. Remedial discretion in German law
Details
a. No theory of remedial discretion in private law (yet)
Details
b. Contract concretisation and adaptation
Details
c. Good faith
Details
d. The quantification of damages
Details
3. Comparison
Details
IV. Some Remarks on the Merits of Remedial Discretion
Details
1. The uneasy case for remedial discretion
Details
2. Unfettered power? Remedial discretion and the rule of law
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
223–250
§ 7 The Essential-Matters Doctrine (Wesentlichkeitsdoktrin) in Private Law: A Constitutional Limit to Judicial Development of the Law?
Victor Jouannaud
Victor Jouannaud
223–250
Details
I. Judicial Development of the Law as a Constitutional Problem – General Aspects
Details
II. Constitutional Principles Preserving the Primacy of the Legislature – Focus on the Essential-Matters Doctrine (Wesentlichkeitsdoktrin)
Details
1. Development of the requirement of a statutory provision (Vorbehalt des Gesetzes)
Details
2. Constitutional basis of the requirement of a statutory provision as developed under the Federal Constitutional Court’s essential-matters doctrine
Details
3. Characteristics of the Federal Constitutional Court’s essential-matters doctrine
Details
4. Institutional extension of the essential-matters doctrine – application to the judiciary
Details
III. Applicability of the Essential-Matters Doctrine to Private Law Adjudication?
Details
1. Ambiguous position of the Federal Constitutional Court
Details
a. Differentiation based on the parties to the dispute
Details
b. Change of position? – Application to constellations opposing private individuals
Details
2. Reservations regarding an application of the doctrine in private law in legal scholarship
Details
a. Judges duty to adjudicate in civil disputes
Details
b. The conciliatory character of private law
Details
3. Differentiating approach based on distinct functions of private law
Details
a. Different functions of private law
Details
b. Regulatory use of private law
Details
aa. Regulation and fundamental rights
Details
bb. Regulation and democratic legitimacy – who defines the common good?
Details
c. The functions of balancing interests and of providing infrastructure
Details
IV. Conclusion
Details
251–270
§ 8 Private International Law between Objectivity and Power
Andreas Engel
Andreas Engel
251–270
Details
I. Introduction: Private International Law, Objectivity, and Power
Details
II. A Sketch of the European and US Approaches to International Cases
Details
1. European private international law
Details
2. US approaches to international cases
Details
a. Federal law
Details
b. State law
Details
III. Developments in Europe
Details
1. Public policy exception
Details
2. Overriding mandatory provisions
Details
IV. Developments in the US
Details
1. Federal law
Details
2. State law: Draft Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws
Details
V. Conclusion: Comparative Remarks
Details
273–314
Part 5: Objectivity and Criminal Law
273–314
273–296
§ 9 Algorithmic Crime Control between Risk, Objectivity, and Power
Lucia Sommerer
Lucia Sommerer
273–296
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Objectivity – Algorithms as a Neutral Tool?
Details
1. Sources of lack of objectivity
Details
2. Is algorithmic lack of objectivity superior to human lack of objectivity?
Details
III. Power – Algorithms as Man-Made Artefacts
Details
1. Concealing controversy
Details
2. Risk as a non-objective category
Details
a. Man-made definitions of risk
Details
b. Uneven distribution of risks
Details
c. Tolerated risks
Details
IV. Powershift
Details
1. Away from the public eye – undemocratic decision-making
Details
2. Away from law enforcement officials – de-skilling
Details
3. Away from the courts – limited legal scrutiny due to complexity
Details
4. From tool to authority figure – algorithmic thoughtlessness
Details
5. From the logic of the law to the logic of algorithms – ‘machine logic’
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
297–314
§ 10 Innocence: A Presumption, a Principle, and a Status
Martín D. Haissiner
Martín D. Haissiner
297–314
Details
I. Introduction to the Concept of Innocence
Details
II. An Epistemological Presumption
Details
III. An Axiological Principle
Details
IV. A Protected Status
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
317–368
Part 6: Objectivity and International Arbitration
317–368
317–340
§ 11 Stateless Justice: The Evolutionary Character of International Arbitration
Fabio Núñez del Prado
Fabio Núñez del Prado
317–340
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Arbitration as a Spontaneous Order
Details
III. Why Is It Important to Understand International Arbitration as a Spontaneous Order?
Details
1. Disappointing experience: the elimination of the recourse of annulment in Belgium in 1985
Details
2. Successful experience: the recognition of the non-signatory theories in the Peruvian Law of Arbitration in 2014
Details
IV. The Evolutionary Character of Consent and Arbitrability
Details
1. The spontaneous evolution of the concept of consent
Details
2. The spontaneous evolution of the concept of arbitrability: towards universal arbitrability
Details
a. The original criterion of arbitrability: economic nature or similar concepts
Details
b. The expansion of arbitrability: broad interpretation of the general criterion
Details
c. Concrete examples of extended arbitrability
Details
d. Towards universal arbitrability
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
341–368
§ 12 International Arbitration as a Project of World Order: Reimagining the Legal Foundations of International Arbitration
Santiago Oñate
Santiago Oñate
341–368
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Existing Theoretical Approaches to the Arbitral Legal Order
Details
1. The localist approach
Details
2. The pluralist approach
Details
3. The autonomous order approach
Details
III. The World Order Approach
Details
IV. Further Conceptualization of Arbitration as a Project of the World Order
Details
1. Projects and systems (Kahn)
Details
2. Dédoublement fonctionnel (Scelle)
Details
3. Transnational legal process (Jessup and Koh)
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
371–424
Part 7: Objectivity and Interdisciplinary Perspectives of Economics and Literature
371–424
371–404
§ 13 Economic Analysis of Law: Inherent Component of the Legal System
Peter Zickgraf
Peter Zickgraf
371–404
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Positive vs. Normative Economic Analysis of Law
Details
III. Economic Analysis and the Legislative Process
Details
IV. Economic Analysis and Adjudication
Details
1. Interpretation of the law
Details
a. Subjective-teleological interpretation
Details
aa. Positive Economic Analysis
Details
bb. Normative Economic Analysis
Details
b. Objective-teleological interpretation
Details
aa. Positive Economic Analysis
Details
bb. Normative Economic Analysis
Details
(1) Existing interpretation of the statutory rule in case law and legal scholarship
Details
(2) Non-existent interpretation of the statutory rule in case law and legal scholarship
Details
(3) Absence of legal principles
Details
2. Enhancement of the law
Details
a. Legal principles
Details
aa. General features of legal principles
Details
bb. Two ways of establishing legal principles: inference through induction and traceability to the idea of law
Details
b. Efficiency as a legal principle
Details
aa. Inductive Inference
Details
(1) Positive law
Details
(2) Legal precedent
Details
bb. Traceability to the idea of law
Details
c. Efficiency as the normative basis of an enhancement of the law
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
405–424
§ 14 From the Furies to ‘Off with Their Heads’: The Complex Inter-Relation between Law and Power in the Legal-Literary Canon
Emilia Jocelyn-Holt
Emilia Jocelyn-Holt
405–424
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. The Oresteia: Law as the Institutionalization of Power
Details
III. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland: Law as the Language of Power
Details
IV. The Trial: Law as the Instrument of Power
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
427–477
Part 8: Structural Objectivity
427–477
427–448
§ 15 Metaphors Lawyers Live by: Cognitive Linguistics and the Challenge for Pursuing Objectivity in Legal Reasoning
Jan-Erik Schirmer
Jan-Erik Schirmer
427–448
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Dieselgate in German Courts
Details
1. Three judgments, two and a half opinions, one issue
Details
2. Core question: burden of proof
Details
III. Cognitive Metaphor Theory
Details
1. Metaphorical feedback-effect
Details
2. Some empirical evidence
Details
IV. Dieselgate Metaphors: Of People and Networks
Details
1. Personification metaphor
Details
a. The corporation is a different person
Details
b. The inner structure stays hidden
Details
2. Network metaphor
Details
a. The corporation is a network
Details
b. The inner structure is revealed
Details
V. How to Deal with Metaphors?
Details
1. Come to stay
Details
2. Metaphors matter
Details
449–477
§ 16 The Citizenship Duality
Alvin Padilla-Babilonia
Alvin Padilla-Babilonia
449–477
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Citizenship as a Source of Rights and Full Membership
Details
1. Historical foundations
Details
2. Social and legal scholarship
Details
3. Challenges to citizenship as a source of rights and full membership
Details
a. Non-exclusiveness
Details
b. Not enough
Details
III. Citizenship as Instrument of Power
Details
1. Historical foundations
Details
2. Social and legal scholarship
Details
3. Mapping citizenship law as an instrument of power
Details
4. Challenges to citizenship as an instrument of power
Details
a. Reclaiming citizenship
Details
b. Instrumental turn of citizenship
Details
IV. Indigenous Peoples and Territorians
Details
1. Indigenous peoples
Details
2. Territorians
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY-SA
Access
The Law between Objectivity and Power , page 449 - 477
§ 16 The Citizenship Duality
Autoren
Alvin Padilla-Babilonia
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748927211-449
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-8334-2
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-2721-1
Chapter Preview
Chapter Preview
Share
Download PDF
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748927211-449
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
