Jump to content
International Judicial Legitimacy / In the name of the European Union, the Member States and/or the European citizens?
International Judicial Legitimacy / In the name of the European Union, the Member States and/or the European citizens?
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Authors
Page
1–8
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–8
Details
9–18
Introduction
Prof. Hélène Ruiz Fabri, Dr André Nunes Chaib
Prof. Hélène Ruiz Fabri, Dr André Nunes Chaib
9–18
Details
The central issues at stake
Details
The structure of the book
Details
19–44
Democratic Legitimacy and Non-Majoritarian Institutions: Reflections on the Functional and Democratic Legitimacy of International Adjudicative Bodies and Independent Regulatory Agencies
Alain Zamaria
Alain Zamaria
19–44
Details
Introduction
Details
I. Domestic Analogy and the Legitimacy of International Adjudicative Bodies
Details
A. Domestic Analogy and the International Order
Details
From Analogy to Utopia?
Details
The Legitimacy of International Institutions
Details
B. Democratic Legitimacy and the Demos
Details
A European Agenda
Details
The promotion of the ius publicum europaeum
Details
An unachievable common project?
Details
II. Proposals to Legitimize International Adjudicative Bodies – A Disorder of Orders?
Details
A. Constitutionalist approaches
Details
B. Multilayered governance approaches
Details
The global administrative law project
Details
The public law theory and global projects
Details
III. The Democratic Legitimacy of Independent Regulatory Agencies
Details
A. The institutional design of regulatory agencies
Details
Non-identified political objects
Details
The rise of the unelected
Details
Regulatory agencies in Europe
Details
Regulatory agencies in the US
Details
B. Output and Input Legitimacy of Regulatory Agencies
Details
The output legitimacy of regulatory agencies
Details
The delegation of public authority
Details
The independence of non-majoritarian institutions
Details
Procedural accountability: the road to input legitimacy
Details
Legitimacy through impartiality and transparency
Details
Democratic legitimacy beyond the state
Details
Conclusion
Details
45–70
In Nobody's Name: A Checks and Balances Approach to International Judicial Independence
Aida Torres Pérez
Aida Torres Pérez
45–70
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. From the National to the International Judiciary
Details
A. The Pervasiveness of State Consent
Details
1. The origin and the design of ICs
Details
2. Compulsory jurisdiction
Details
3. Enforcement and compliance
Details
B. The Isolation and Diversity of ICs
Details
C. Separation of Powers
Details
III. From Judicial Independence to Interdependence
Details
A. Why Interdependence?
Details
B. Interdependence between Whom?
Details
1. State governments
Details
2. International political institutions
Details
3. Domestic courts
Details
4. International courts
Details
IV. Concluding remarks
Details
71–90
Not in the Name of the “Other”: The Democratic Concept of International Adjudication through the Looking Glass
Parvathi Menon
Parvathi Menon
71–90
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Europe vis-à-vis the Rest: Democracy and Its Discontents in International Adjudication
Details
A. Democratic Inclusion and Exclusion
Details
B. Who is the Fairest of Them All? The Legitimating Force of Impartiality and Independence
Details
III. Conclusion: The Road to Inequality is Paved with Democratic Intentions
Details
91–108
Courtspeak: A Method to Read the Argumentative Structure Employed by the International Court of Justice in its Judgments and Advisory Opinions
Lorenzo Gasbarri
Lorenzo Gasbarri
91–108
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. The Motivation
Details
III. The Fabula and the Syuzhet
Details
IV. The Hero
Details
V. The Voice
Details
VI. The Theme
Details
VII. Conclusion
Details
109–128
International Public Authority in Perspective: Comparing the Roles of Courts and International Organizations in Democratizing International Law
André Nunes Chaib
André Nunes Chaib
109–128
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Conceptualizing Authority for International Institutions
Details
III. Democracy as Public Value for International Institutions
Details
IV. The Role of International Institutions in Democratizing the International Public
Details
A. The Potential for International Institutions to Create Public and Democratic Generalities
Details
B. The Potential of International Courts
Details
C. The Potential of International Organizations
Details
Conclusion
Details
129–146
The Dispute Settlement Function of the International Court of Justice in Croatia v. Serbia
Cecily Rose
Cecily Rose
129–146
Details
1. Introduction
Details
2. The Court’s Jurisdictional Rulings in Croatia v Serbia
Details
3. A Critique of the Court’s Treatment of the Issue of Succession to Responsibility
Details
a. The Court’s Sequencing of the Issues in Contention
Details
b. The Court’s Treatment of the Monetary Gold Principle
Details
4. The Court as Fact-Finder
Details
5. Conclusion
Details
147–168
The Public Authority of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
Lan Ngoc Nguyen
Lan Ngoc Nguyen
147–168
Details
I. Introdruction
Details
II. ITLOS’ Exercise Of Public Authority
Details
1. Prompt release proceedings
Details
2. Provisional measures
Details
3. Contentious cases
Details
a. Virginia G
Details
b. Bangladesh/Myanmar
Details
4. Advisory opinion
Details
III. Conclusion
Details
169–202
Not in My Name! Claudia Pechstein and the Post-Consensual Foundations of the Court of Arbitration for Sport
Antoine Duval
Antoine Duval
169–202
Details
I. Not in my name! Why CAS does not speak in the name of Claudia Pechstein
Details
A. Free consent as foundation for the CAS
Details
1. The roots of the consensual myth
Details
2. Keeping the consensual myth alive: The legal strategies of the CAS and the SFT
Details
B. The Pechstein case: Endpoint for the consensual myth?
Details
1. The mounting realist critique: This is not a consensual arbitration
Details
a. The realism of the doctrine
Details
b. The confession of the SFT in the Cañas case
Details
2. The Pechstein rulings: Consent, or no consent? That is the question
Details
a. The ruling of the LG München: Not in Claudia Pechstein’s name!
Details
b. The ruling of the OLG München: Forced CAS arbitration as an abuse of ISU’s monopoly
Details
c. The ruling of the BGH: Saving the consensual foundations of the CAS
Details
II. Speaking in the name of (…)?
Details
A. In the name of… the States
Details
B. In the name of…efficiency
Details
C. In the name of… proximity
Details
D. In the name of… equality
Details
III. Conclusion: Democratize the CAS!
Details
203–226
Re-Imagined Communities: The WTO Appellate Body and the Communitization of WTO Law
Geraldo Vidigal
Geraldo Vidigal
203–226
Details
I. Introduction
Details
II. Society and Community in the WTO Regime
Details
A. Society, Community and International Institutions
Details
B. Communitarian Institutions in the WTO Agreements
Details
C. Communitarian Institutions and Bilateral Enforcement
Details
III. The Appellate Body and the Establishment of a WTO Community
Details
A. The Prospect of a Trade-Focused Community
Details
B. From Trade Regime to Text Regime: The Appellate Body’s Intervention in US – Shrimp and Beyond
Details
C. Legitimate Non-Trade Values beyond the Four Corners: the Delegation of Authority and the Voices of the International Community
Details
D. Delegated Authority and the Voice of the International Community
Details
IV. The Promise and Threats of Communitization
Details
A. Communitization as a Legitimacy-Enhancing Approach
Details
B. The Communitization of Interpretations
Details
C. Communitization and the Challenge of Value-Laden Regionalism
Details
V. Conclusion
Details
227–248
The Democracy We Want: Standards of Review and Democratic Embeddedness at the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Rene Urueña
Rene Urueña
227–248
Details
1. Standard of review and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights:
Details
2. Gelman and the no-deference standard
Details
3. Regional democracy, political embeddedness, and the Inter-American community of human rights practice:
Details
4. Conclusion: Good faith in standard of review definition
Details
249–270
In the name of the European Union, the Member States and/or the European citizens?
Freya Clausen
Freya Clausen
249–270
Details
I. Institutional and functional legitimacy
Details
A. The judges: judicial independence and composition of the Court
Details
B. The functions of the Court
Details
II. Procedural legitimacy
Details
III. Legitimacy through sound and reasoned decisions
Details
271–300
In the Name of the European Club of Liberal Democracies: On the Identity, Mandate and National Buffering of the ECtHR's Case Law
Armin von Bogdandy, Laura Hering
Armin von Bogdandy, Laura Hering
271–300
Details
I. Agenda
Details
II. The Democratic Legitimacy of the ECtHR
Details
A. The Issue
Details
B. The Club of Liberal Democracies
Details
III. The Mandate to Protect the Democratic Rule of Law
Details
A. The Development of the Mandate
Details
B. The Mandate in Times of Crises
Details
1. Court Authority in Times of Crises
Details
2. Limits of the Case Law on State of Emergency
Details
3. Core Rights
Details
4. The Abuse of Rights
Details
5. The Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies
Details
6. The Procedural Margin of Appreciation
Details
IV. Do the Bundesverfassungsgericht and the Corte Costituzionale frustrate the pursuit of this mandate?
Details
A. Domestic Buffering of the ECtHR’s Authority
Details
B. Legitimacy through Control
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY-NC-ND
Access
International Judicial Legitimacy , page 249 - 270
In the name of the European Union, the Member States and/or the European citizens?
Autoren
Freya Clausen
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748908661-249
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-6762-5
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-0866-1
Chapter Preview
Chapter Preview
Share
Download PDF
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748908661-249
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
