Jump to content
When NGOs Fulfill State Obligations / 3. Beneficiaries’ Perspective: How NGO-State Relations Can Affect Social Rights
When NGOs Fulfill State Obligations / 3. Beneficiaries’ Perspective: How NGO-State Relations Can Affect Social Rights
Contents
Chapter
Expand
|
Collapse
Page
1–20
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
1–20
Details
21–41
1. Introduction
21–41
Details
42–80
2. Background: Social Development and NGOs in Africa
42–80
Details
2.1. Theory and Context
Details
2.1.1. Social Development in Theory and Law
Details
2.1.1.1. Development Theories
Details
2.1.1.2. Theories on Service Provision in Developing Countries
Details
2.1.2. Socio-Economic Context of African LDCs
Details
2.1.3. Defining Non-Governmental Organizations
Details
2.2. NGOs and Social Development
Details
2.2.1. Social Protection and the Role of NGOs in Africa
Details
2.2.2. NGOs in Sub-Saharan Africa
Details
2.2.2.1. History of Associational Life and Non-State Service Provision in Africa
Details
2.2.2.2. The Rise of Foreign-Backed NGOs
Details
2.2.2.3. Governments Restricting NGOs
Details
2.3. Conclusion
Details
81–134
3. Beneficiaries’ Perspective: How NGO-State Relations Can Affect Social Rights
81–134
Details
3.1. A Beneficiary-Centered Approach
Details
3.2. Social Rights of Beneficiaries
Details
3.2.1. The Human Rights Framework & General Problems with Social Rights
Details
3.2.2. International and Regional Protection for Social Rights
Details
3.2.2.1. The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Details
3.2.2.2. African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
Details
3.2.2.3. African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child
Details
3.2.3. Social Rights and their Normative Content
Details
3.2.4. Minimum Essential Levels of Social Rights
Details
3.3. NGO-Government Relations: How Things Can Go Wrong For Beneficiaries
Details
3.3.1. NGO-Government Relations
Details
3.3.1.1. Complications of the NGO-Government Relationship
Details
3.3.1.2. The Peculiarities of Regulating NGOs in Informal Security Regimes
Details
3.3.1.3. NSP-Government Relations can interfere with Social Rights
Details
3.3.2. Regulating Nonprofit Providers: Challenges and Pitfalls
Details
3.3.2.1. Irrationality, Corruption and Arbitrary Implementation
Details
3.3.2.2. Limited State Capacity to Implement Regulations
Details
3.3.2.3. Burdensome Rules and Noncompliance
Details
3.3.2.4. Inadequate Regulatory Oversight
Details
3.3.2.5. The Concurrence of Burdensome and Inadequate Rules
Details
3.4. Conclusion
Details
135–220
4. Classifying NGOs: Who Fulfills Social Rights, Who Fulfills State Obligations?
135–220
Details
4.1. Existing NGO Classifications in the Literature
Details
4.1.1. Classification Based on Relative Capacity
Details
4.1.2. Classification Based on Relative Function
Details
4.2. Deriving New Criteria from Social Rights Law
Details
4.2.1. Theoretical Framework
Details
4.2.1.1. Doctrinal Foundations: Recognizing Indirect or Implicit Duties
Details
4.2.1.2. Normative Foundations: The Principle of Subsidiarity
Details
4.2.1.2.1. As a Component of the ICESCR’s Overarching Purpose
Details
4.2.1.2.2. As Appropriate in the African Legal Context
Details
4.2.1.2.3. As Appropriate for the Regulation of NGOs
Details
4.2.2. General Social Rights Obligations of the State
Details
4.2.2.1. Duty to Fulfill Social Rights: Realizing Social Rights Through NGOs
Details
4.2.2.1.1. Appropriateness
Details
4.2.2.1.2. Essentiality as a Measure of Appropriateness
Details
4.2.2.1.3. Feasibility
Details
4.2.2.1.4. Maximizing Availability: Public Spending, Private Resources and Accepting Foreign Funding
Details
4.2.2.1.5. As Compared to State Duties under the African Human Rights Charter
Details
4.2.2.2. Duty to Respect Social Rights: Permitting Essential NGOs
Details
4.2.2.3. Duty to Protect Social Rights: Controlling Harmful NGOs
Details
4.2.2.4. Concluding Remarks
Details
4.2.3. Minimum Core Obligations
Details
4.2.3.1. ICESCR Recognizes Minimum Essential Levels
Details
4.2.3.2. The Contents of Core Obligations May Be Legally Determined
Details
4.2.3.3. Reconciling Core Obligations and Progressive Realization
Details
4.2.3.4. Core Obligations Set Priorities for Realizing ESC Rights
Details
4.2.3.5. Implications for the Legality of Restrictive NGO Laws
Details
4.3. A New Taxonomy for NGOs: Different Functional Type
Details
4.3.1. Non-Social NGOs, Duplicative NGOs & Inappropriate NGOs
Details
4.3.2. Supplemental NGOs & Substitutional NGOs
Details
4.3.3. Complementary NGOs
Details
4.4. Conclusion
Details
221–247
5. Regulating NGOs: Limits on and Duties of the State
221–247
Details
5.1. The Analytical Framework: Triangular Models for Social Rights
Details
5.2. The Three Legal Relations: State-NGO-Beneficiary
Details
5.2.1. The Beneficiary-to-State Relation
Details
5.2.2. The State-to-NGO Relation
Details
5.2.2.1. From Provisioning Relation to Enabling / Ensuring Relations
Details
5.2.2.2. From Admission to Fulfillment / Discharge of State Duties
Details
5.2.2.3. From Finance to Guarantee / Permit
Details
5.2.2.4. From Quality to Quality / Supervise
Details
5.2.3. The NGO-to-Beneficiary Relation
Details
5.3. Summary
Details
248–288
6. Evaluating NGO Laws: Unlawful Restrictions on Social Rights?
248–288
Details
6.1. Three Types of Restrictions: Obstructions, Derogations and Limitations
Details
6.2. The Permissibility of Limiting NGO-Provided Rights
Details
6.2.1. The Permissibility of Limiting ESC Rights in General
Details
6.2.1.1. Specific Limitations Clauses of the ICESCR: Article 13 (3) and (4)
Details
6.2.1.2. Permissibility of Limitations According to the African Charter
Details
6.2.2. Articles 4 and 5 Do Not Forbid the Limitation of NGO-Provided Rights
Details
6.2.3. Article 4 Can Be Used Analogously for NGO-Provided Rights
Details
6.2.4. Using Article 4 to Restrict Limitations on NGO-Provided Rights
Details
6.3. Permissibility of Obstructing the Realization of Rights by NGOs
Details
6.3.1. The Doctrine of Deliberately Retrogressive Measures
Details
6.3.2. Retrogressive Measures Should Meet the Criteria of Article 4
Details
6.4. Balancing Rights Claims: Beneficiaries, NGOs and the Rights of Others
Details
6.4.1. The Permissibility of Limiting ESC Rights to Protect the Rights of Others
Details
6.4.2. Balancing Competing Rights: Examples from the Courts of Uganda
Details
6.5. Conclusion
Details
289–305
7. Conclusion: NGO Regulations and Aid Efficacy
289–305
Details
306–316
8. References
306–316
Details
317–337
Bibliography
317–337
Details
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY
Access
When NGOs Fulfill State Obligations , page 81 - 134
3. Beneficiaries’ Perspective: How NGO-State Relations Can Affect Social Rights
Autoren
Jihan Kahssay
DOI
doi.org/10.5771/9783748906926-81
ISBN print: 978-3-8487-6576-8
ISBN online: 978-3-7489-0692-6
Chapter Preview
Chapter Preview
Share
Download PDF
Download citation
RIS
BibTeX
Copy DOI link
doi.org/10.5771/9783748906926-81
Share by email
Video schließen
Share by email Nomos eLibrary
Recipient*
Sender*
Message*
Your name
Send message
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.
