Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice

Daniela Schlütz; Wiebke Möhring

doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2018-1-31

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- I–II Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis I–II
- 1–6 EDITORIAL 1–6
  - Editorial Juliana Raupp, Anne Bartsch, Klaus Kamps, Christoph Neuberger, Andreas M. Scheu Juliana Raupp, Anne Bartsch, Klaus Kamps, Christoph Neuberger, Andreas M. Scheu
- 7–88 FULL PAPER 7–88
  - 7–30 100 years communication study in Europe: Karl Bücher’s impact on the discipline’s reflexive project Thomas Wiedemann, Michael Meyen, Iván Lacasa-Mas Thomas Wiedemann, Michael Meyen, Iván Lacasa-Mas 7–30
  - 31–58 Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice Daniela Schlütz, Wiebke Möhring Daniela Schlütz, Wiebke Möhring 31–58
  - 59–88 Does consistency matter? Perception and persuasiveness of value appeals in populist communication Dominique S. Wirz Dominique S. Wirz 59–88
- 89–128 EXTENDED PAPER 89–128
  - Zwischen Gratwanderung und „Verpapstung“ eines Landesvaters. Die Presseberichterstattung über die Landtagswahlen in Rheinland-Pfalz und Baden-Württemberg 2016 – im Vergleich zu 2011 Jürgen Wilke, Melanie Leidecker-Sandmann Jürgen Wilke, Melanie Leidecker-Sandmann
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
CC-BY Access

SCM Studies in Communication and Media , page 31 - 58

Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice

Autoren

Daniela Schlütz Wiebke Möhring

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-1-31
- ISSN: 2192-4007
- ISSN online: 2192-4007
Abstract

Good research practice faces both ethical and methodological challenges that cannot always be met at the same time. The paper systematically relates research ethics to methodological issues discussing potential dilemmas. It sheds light on predicaments regarding every step of the standardized research process from study design to population and sampling, recruiting and refusal conversion, data collection and analysis as well as publication. We aim at increasing awareness of these dilemmas and encouraging scientific debate about possible solutions. We propose to make use of the rhetorical, case-based approach to research by McKee and Porter (2009) to meet this aim.
Share