Potenziale einer österreichisch-deutschen Zusammenarbeit in der intergouvernementalen Europapolitik

Zekije Bajrami; Livia Puglisi; Lea Stallbaum; Michael Stellwag; Julian Plottka

doi:10.5771/0720-5120-2020-3-186

Zekije Bajrami, Livia Puglisi, Lea Stallbaum, Michael Stellwag, Julian Plottka, Potenziale einer österreichisch-deutschen Zusammenarbeit in der intergouvernementalen Europapolitik in:

integration , Seite 186 - 205

Alle Ausgaben: integration

integration Jahrgang 43 (2020) Heft 3

Kein Zugriff

doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-3-186
ISSN print: 0720-5120
ISSN online: 0720-5120
Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden

Download Zitation

Zusammenfassung

Hochrangige Autoren aus Wissenschaft und Praxis analysieren die Entwicklung der europäischen Integration aus Sicht der Politik- und Rechtswissenschaft und verwandter Disziplinen. Die Zeitschrift bietet durch wissenschaftliche Aufsätze und Diskussionsforen grundlegende Analysen und Debattenbeiträge zur Europapolitik sowie Tagungsberichte und Literaturbesprechungen.

Homepage: www.integration.nomos.de

Abstract

Renowned scholars and practitioners discuss current issues of European integration in the areas of political science, law and related fields of research in integration. This journal contains three categories of articles: academic contributions and fundamental analyses of European policy, conference reports and literature reviews.

Website: www.integration.nomos.de

Kapitel Ausklappen | EinklappenAutorenSeiten
167–168 Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 167–168
169–205 AUFSÄTZE 169–205
- 169–185 Besteuerung digitaler Unternehmen – die schwierige Suche nach einem europäischen Ansatz Daniel Klein, Christopher Ludwig, Christoph Spengel Daniel Klein, Christopher Ludwig, Christoph Spengel 169–185
- 186–205 Potenziale einer österreichisch-deutschen Zusammenarbeit in der intergouvernementalen Europapolitik Zekije Bajrami, Livia Puglisi, Lea Stallbaum, Michael Stellwag, Julian Plottka Zekije Bajrami, Livia Puglisi, Lea Stallbaum, Michael Stellwag, Julian Plottka 186–205
206–230 WIEDERABDRUCK 206–230
- Kann Europa gelingen? Vorhaben und Chancen der deutschen Ratspräsidentschaft Daniel Göler, Mathias Jopp Daniel Göler, Mathias Jopp
231–244 FORUM 231–244
- Die Konferenz zur Zukunft Europas zwischen „Konvent 2.0“ und „Intergouvernementalismus 3.0“: Warum Europa diese Chance zur Reform nutzen muss Julian Plottka Julian Plottka
245–254 TAGUNGEN 245–254
- Gemeinsam die Zukunft Europas gestalten: Herausforderungen für die deutsche EU-Ratspräsidentschaft im Schatten der COVID-19-Pandemie Vittoria Meißner Vittoria Meißner

Kein Zugriff

integration , Seite 167 - 168

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis

DOI

doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-3-167
ISSN print: 0720-5120
ISSN online: 0720-5120
Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden

Kapitelvorschau

Vollzugriff

integration , Seite 169 - 185

Besteuerung digitaler Unternehmen – die schwierige Suche nach einem europäischen Ansatz

Autoren

DOI

doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-3-169
ISSN print: 0720-5120
ISSN online: 0720-5120
Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden

Abstract

In March 2018, the European Commission introduced two Directive proposals to target tax challenges in the era of digitalization. The first Directive proposal suggests to introduce a digital services tax of 3 percent on gross revenues from digital services as an interim measure. The second one proposes as a long-term solution to extend the permanent establishment concept to create a virtual permanent establishment if a corporation has a “significant digital presence” in a country. So far, a lack of consensus among the member states of the European Union has made successful legislation on the European level unlikely. Despite the absence of an intra-community agreement, several member states have implemented the Directive proposal of a digital services tax with various adaptions unilaterally. These actions contradict the efforts to develop agreeable tax reforms on a multilateral level. The article at hand critically evaluates the current European reform proposals.

Download PDF Jetzt lesen

Kein Zugriff

integration , Seite 186 - 205

Potenziale einer österreichisch-deutschen Zusammenarbeit in der intergouvernementalen Europapolitik

Autoren

DOI

doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-3-186
ISSN print: 0720-5120
ISSN online: 0720-5120
Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden

Abstract

In an increasingly intergovernmental European Union (EU), minilateral formations can reduce the complexity of EU decision-making. However, block formation can also complicate it. Therefore, bilateral diplomacy has to build bridges between these formations. Against this backdrop, the article examines to what extent an Austro-German cooperation can act as such a bridge between the Franco-German couple and the “frugal four”, the “Visegrád Four” and maybe in the future the Western Balkans. To this end, both the orientation of Austrian and German EU policy as well as concrete government positions on the “European Green Deal”, the multiannual financial framework, the defence union, the enlargement policy towards the Western Balkans and institutional reforms are examined. Austro-German cooperation offers opportunities for concrete initiatives on shared interests, such as the rule of law mechanism, as well as potentials for compromise in other policy areas, such as the multiannual financial framework.

Kein Zugriff

integration , Seite 206 - 230

Kann Europa gelingen? Vorhaben und Chancen der deutschen Ratspräsidentschaft

Autoren

DOI

doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-3-206
ISSN print: 0720-5120
ISSN online: 0720-5120
Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden

Kapitelvorschau

Kein Zugriff

integration , Seite 231 - 244

Die Konferenz zur Zukunft Europas zwischen „Konvent 2.0“ und „Intergouvernementalismus 3.0“: Warum Europa diese Chance zur Reform nutzen muss

Autoren

DOI

doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-3-231
ISSN print: 0720-5120
ISSN online: 0720-5120
Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden

Abstract

Three months after the initially scheduled start of the Conference on the Future of Europe (CoFoE) its design remains unclear. While the European Parliament proposed a rather ambitious concept of a “European Convention 2.0”, the European Council seeks additional legitimacy for its Strategic Agenda, excluding the possibility of treaty reforms. However, not all national governments seem to be convinced that such an “Intergovernmentalism 3.0” legitimised by participative democracy is a good idea. In between these two positions, the European Commission seeks to water down Ursula von der Leyen’s bid to the European Parliament. Comparing the opportunities and risks entailed in these three concepts of the CoFoE, the article argues for an open process, which neither pushes for nor excludes treaty reform. If citizens and civil society support such a constitutional momentum, it is about time to address the numerous reform needs and to end the further procrastination of treaty reforms.

Kein Zugriff

integration , Seite 245 - 254

Gemeinsam die Zukunft Europas gestalten: Herausforderungen für die deutsche EU-Ratspräsidentschaft im Schatten der COVID-19-Pandemie

Autoren

DOI

doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-3-245
ISSN print: 0720-5120
ISSN online: 0720-5120
Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden

Kapitelvorschau

Abstract

In an increasingly intergovernmental European Union (EU), minilateral formations can reduce the complexity of EU decision-making. However, block formation can also complicate it. Therefore, bilateral diplomacy has to build bridges between these formations. Against this backdrop, the article examines to what extent an Austro-German cooperation can act as such a bridge between the Franco-German couple and the “frugal four”, the “Visegrád Four” and maybe in the future the Western Balkans. To this end, both the orientation of Austrian and German EU policy as well as concrete government positions on the “European Green Deal”, the multiannual financial framework, the defence union, the enlargement policy towards the Western Balkans and institutional reforms are examined. Austro-German cooperation offers opportunities for concrete initiatives on shared interests, such as the rule of law mechanism, as well as potentials for compromise in other policy areas, such as the multiannual financial framework.

Durchsuchen Sie das Werk

Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein