- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-2
- ISSN print: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 0720-5120
- Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden
Zusammenfassung
Hochrangige Autoren aus Wissenschaft und Praxis analysieren die Entwicklung der europäischen Integration aus Sicht der Politik- und Rechtswissenschaft und verwandter Disziplinen. Die Zeitschrift bietet durch wissenschaftliche Aufsätze und Diskussionsforen grundlegende Analysen und Debattenbeiträge zur Europapolitik sowie Tagungsberichte und Literaturbesprechungen.
Homepage: www.integration.nomos.de
Abstract
Renowned scholars and practitioners discuss current issues of European integration in the areas of political science, law and related fields of research in integration. This journal contains three categories of articles: academic contributions and fundamental analyses of European policy, conference reports and literature reviews.
Website: www.integration.nomos.de
- 85–135 AUFSÄTZE 85–135
- 85–100 Die „Methode Barnier“ – Lehren aus der Verhandlungsführung der EU beim Brexit Nicolai von Ondarza Nicolai von Ondarza 85–100
- 121–135 Rechtliche Lösungen für politische Konflikte? Rechtsstaatsbezogene Vertragsverletzungsverfahren gegen Ungarn Sonja Priebus, Lisa H. Anders Sonja Priebus, Lisa H. Anders 121–135
- 136–160 FORUM 136–160
- 136–143 Europaskeptizismus und die Zukunft Europas. Ansichten aus den Hauptstädten Michael Kaeding, Johannes Pollak, Paul Schmidt Michael Kaeding, Johannes Pollak, Paul Schmidt 136–143
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-2-I
- ISSN print: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 0720-5120
- Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden
Kapitelvorschau
Die „Methode Barnier“ – Lehren aus der Verhandlungsführung der EU beim Brexit
Autoren
DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-2-85
- ISSN print: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 0720-5120
- Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden
Abstract
The Brexit negotiations constituted unchartered political and institutional territory for the European Union (EU). This analysis shows how a new institutional approach enabled the EU-27 to present an unusually united front. The “Barnier method” is characterised by five elements: a strong political mandate from the European Council, a single EU negotiator based in the European Commission in the person of Michel Barnier, very close coordination with the Member States and the European Parliament, and a high degree of transparency. Lessons can also be drawn from this for the next phase of the Brexit negotiations and the EU’s relations with other third countries.
Die Währungsunion benötigt eine Fiskalunion – aber welche? Eine Analyse der Euro-Reformblockade
Autoren
DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-2-101
- ISSN print: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 0720-5120
- Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden
Abstract
Although the euro area looks back at a phase of comprehensive reforms, its fiscal institutions still lack a consistent shape. The article analyses how the competition between two distinct models of a European Fiscal Union (EFU) has created the current reform deadlock. This is the struggle between a centralised EFU with its broad arsenal of new European fiscal instruments that stress the idea of mutual insurance on the one hand, and a decentralised EFU that puts the emphasis on market discipline through sovereign insolvency procedures and national fiscal self-responsibility on the other hand. The article identifies the main camps on both sides of the controversy: The European Commission together with the European Central Bank and high-debt Member States favour a centralised EFU; low-debt Member States such as the countries of the Hanseatic League and Germany push towards a decentralised EFU. This conflict explains why currently substantial Commission euro area reform initiatives are either watered down or completely fail in the Eurogroup. Reform packages that combine key elements of both models could solve the dilemma. However, Member States increasingly lack the mutual trust that is indispensable to achieve such a grand bargain. The new severe economic and fiscal crisis that is caused by the COVID-19 pandemic might now speed up the decisions on the final outline of the EFU.
Rechtliche Lösungen für politische Konflikte? Rechtsstaatsbezogene Vertragsverletzungsverfahren gegen Ungarn
Autoren
DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-2-121
- ISSN print: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 0720-5120
- Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden
Abstract
Recently, there has been a renewed interest in infringement procedures as a tool against dismantling the rule of law and democracy in Member States of the European Union (EU). Against this background, this article analyses all seven rule of law-related infringement procedures against Hungary since 2010. It examines how the European Commission justified the opening of the procedures and how the Hungarian government reacted legally and in its public communications. While it has been suggested that infringement procedures would lead to a miscategorisation of rule of law problems, this contribution shows that in the majority of cases, the Commission made clear references to democracy and the rule of law. Nevertheless, the procedures could not dissuade the Hungarian government from its controversial reforms, nor were they able to depoliticise the conflicts over EU foundational values.
Europaskeptizismus und die Zukunft Europas. Ansichten aus den Hauptstädten
Autoren
DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-2-136
- ISSN print: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 0720-5120
- Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden
Abstract
Based on a new anthology on the future of Europe in the light of Euroscepticism, this article examines how the increasing prominence of Eurosceptic and nationalist parties is affecting the thinking of mainstream parties, their representatives in the European Parliament and the future of European integration. The publication of the anthology is timed to coincide with the strategic vision of the European Council, the Council, the Commission and the Parliament as well as with the next phase of the negotiations on the future relations between the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom and the Conference on the Future of Europe. It maps and analyses 39 national perspectives from all EU Member States as well as from neighbouring European countries and potential candidate countries.
„The beginning of a new chapter“? Eine Einordnung der neuen EU-Gleichstellungsstrategie 2020-2025
Autoren
DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-2-144
- ISSN print: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 0720-5120
- Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden
Abstract
Gender equality is an essential component of the ambitious agenda of the new President of the European Commission. After years of stagnation, this policy field shall see a revival; the vision is a “Union of Equality”. As part of the working programme for the first 100 days in office, the Commission published its “Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025” in March 2020. This contribution elucidates the significance of gender equality for the Commission and relates these new ambitions to the general development of the policy field. The Gender Equality Strategy and its six main goals are then introduced and the likelihood of actual implementation is discussed against the background of increasing fragmentation and polarisation in the Council and in the European Parliament. The German Council Presidency will play an important role for its realisation.
Demokratieabbau in Zeiten der Pandemie: zur Reaktion der EU auf die Fälle Ungarn und Polen
Autoren
DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-2-154
- ISSN print: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 0720-5120
- Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is not only putting European financial solidarity to the test, but also the common values of the European Union (EU). In Hungary and Poland, the governments are using the situation to undermine democratic principles and expand their own position of power. The EU - once again - is struggling to give an adequate answer. While the European Parliament has clear words, but little options for action, most national governments show a reserved attitude. Similarly, the European Commission has expressed concern, but does not want to take any immediate countermeasures.
Dialog unter Freunden – zu den EU-Kanada-Beziehungen
Autoren
DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2020-2-161
- ISSN print: 0720-5120
- ISSN online: 0720-5120
- Nomos, Baden-Baden Nomos, Baden-Baden