Der Nukleare Nichtverbreitungsvertrag und der neue Kernwaffenverbotsvertrag – harmonisch, kompatibel, unverträglich?

Harald Müller

doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2018-2-61

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis
- EDITORIAL
  - Editorial: Nukleare Abrüstung in der Krise Götz Neuneck, Patricia Schneider Götz Neuneck, Patricia Schneider
  - Editorial: Nuclear Disarmament in Crisis Götz Neuneck, Patricia Schneider Götz Neuneck, Patricia Schneider
- 61–97 THEMENSCHWERPUNKT 61–97
  - 61–66 Der Nukleare Nichtverbreitungsvertrag und der neue Kernwaffenverbotsvertrag – harmonisch, kompatibel, unverträglich? Harald Müller Harald Müller 61–66
  - 67–73 The Future of Strategic Arms Control Steven Pifer Steven Pifer 67–73
  - 74–79 European Security and the Future of the INF Treaty Oliver Meier Oliver Meier 74–79
  - 80–85 Revitalizing Diplomatic Efforts to Advance CTBT Entry into Force Daryl G. Kimball Daryl G. Kimball 80–85
  - 86–91 Der Fissile Material (Cutoff) Treaty – ein Vertrag, der niemals kommt? Annette Schaper Annette Schaper 86–91
  - 92–97 North Korea and Arms Control: Past Agreements and Future Proposals Elisabeth Suh Elisabeth Suh 92–97
- 98–103 BEITRÄGE AUS SICHERHEITSPOLITIK UND FRIEDENSFORSCHUNG 98–103
  - Introducing Civil Clauses against Expanding Military Research at German Universities? A Descriptive and Ethical Analysis of the Discussion* Kerstin Schlögl-Flierl, Alexander Merkl Kerstin Schlögl-Flierl, Alexander Merkl
- 104–104 NEUERSCHEINUNGEN 104–104
- 105–108 Besprechungen 105–108
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

S&F Sicherheit und Frieden , page 61 - 66

Der Nukleare Nichtverbreitungsvertrag und der neue Kernwaffenverbotsvertrag – harmonisch, kompatibel, unverträglich?

Autoren

Harald Müller

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2018-2-61
- ISSN: 0175-274X
- ISSN online: 0175-274x
Zusammenfassung

The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is highly controversial. Nuclear weapon states and their allies call it unrealistic, ineffective and detrimental to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). Supporters - the large majority of United Nations members - regard its adoption as vast progress beyond the NPT and a solid basis for a non-nuclear world. A careful analysis shows that either side is overselling its point. On the one hand, the new treaty is no threat to the existing non-proliferation regime. On the other hand, it contains many weaknesses which reduce its value to symbolic politics via pronouncing a new norm while making it unfit as the operational basis for a non-nuclear world.

Abstract

The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is highly controversial. Nuclear weapon states and their allies call it unrealistic, ineffective and detrimental to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). Supporters - the large majority of United Nations members - regard its adoption as vast progress beyond the NPT and a solid basis for a non-nuclear world. A careful analysis shows that either side is overselling its point. On the one hand, the new treaty is no threat to the existing non-proliferation regime. On the other hand, it contains many weaknesses which reduce its value to symbolic politics via pronouncing a new norm while making it unfit as the operational basis for a non-nuclear world.
Share