Hybride Bedrohnung und Bevölkerungsschutz

Dirk Freudenberg

doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2016-2-141

Contents
- Chapter Expand | CollapseAuthorsPage
- I–IV Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis I–IV
- 97–145 THEMENSCHWERPUNKT 97–145
  - 97–103 Postmoderne Interventionen: In der Grauzone zwischen Begrenzung und Entgrenzung kollektiver Gewalt Hans-Georg Ehrhart Hans-Georg Ehrhart 97–103
  - 104–108 Chimäre statt Chamäleon: Probleme der begrifflichen Zähmung des hybriden Krieges Felix Wassermann Felix Wassermann 104–108
  - 109–113 Tertium datur: Neue politische Konfliktformen wie sogenannte „hybride Kriege“ bringen alte Legitimationsmuster unter Druck Bernhard Koch Bernhard Koch 109–113
  - 114–120 Hybride Kriegführung und das „Center of Gravity“ der Entscheidung Johann Schmid Johann Schmid 114–120
  - 121–125 Die NATO und hybride Kriegführung Johannes Varwick, Aylin Matlé Johannes Varwick, Aylin Matlé 121–125
  - 126–133 Clausewitz und der Kampf um Anerkennung in hybriden Kriegen: Zur Motivation von IS Kämpfern Andreas Herberg-Rothe, Miriam Förstle Andreas Herberg-Rothe, Miriam Förstle 126–133
  - 134–140 Beyond Mere Terrorism: The Islamic State’s Authority as a Social Movement and as a Quasi-State Christoph Günther, Tom Kaden Christoph Günther, Tom Kaden 134–140
  - 141–145 Hybride Bedrohnung und Bevölkerungsschutz Dirk Freudenberg Dirk Freudenberg 141–145
- 146–156 FORUM 146–156
  - 146–150 „Wie wird Friede? “Zur Friedensethik von Dietrich Bonhoeffer Detlef Bald Detlef Bald 146–150
  - 151–156 Der Konflikt um die Ukraine: Was wir von Egon Bahr lernen können Ulrich Kuhn Ulrich Kuhn 151–156
- 157–157 NEUERSCHEINUNGEN 157–157
- 158–164 BESPRECHUNGEN 158–164
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
No access

S&F Sicherheit und Frieden , page 141 - 145

Hybride Bedrohnung und Bevölkerungsschutz

Autoren

Dirk Freudenberg

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2016-2-141
- ISSN: 0175-274X
- ISSN online: 0175-274x
Zusammenfassung

Modern societies that depend on the functions of critical infrastructures are easily threatened by hybrid phenomena, which are a combination of conventional and asymmetric means of warfare. The issue of hybrid threats is challenging modern societies overall, but in particular public security and the business location of modern industrial states, such as Germany. The innovative criterion of this challenge is the conversion of regular and irregular capabilities and actions, and the greatest problem is that this emergence may only be recognized when it is too late for a response. Responses therefore should be based on concepts of resilience for critical infrastructures as well as on the full spectrum of actors and capabilities of the so-called comprehensive approach. But the necessary pre-condition for action is the political awareness and willingness.

Abstract

Modern societies that depend on the functions of critical infrastructures are easily threatened by hybrid phenomena, which are a combination of conventional and asymmetric means of warfare. The issue of hybrid threats is challenging modern societies overall, but in particular public security and the business location of modern industrial states, such as Germany. The innovative criterion of this challenge is the conversion of regular and irregular capabilities and actions, and the greatest problem is that this emergence may only be recognized when it is too late for a response. Responses therefore should be based on concepts of resilience for critical infrastructures as well as on the full spectrum of actors and capabilities of the so-called comprehensive approach. But the necessary pre-condition for action is the political awareness and willingness.
Share