Parteienwettbewerb und Koalitionsbildung in Deutschland 2017/18: Eine Analyse der Wahlprogramme

Simon Jakobs; Uwe Jun

doi:10.5771/0340-1758-2018-2-265

Inhalt
- Kapitel Ausklappen | EinklappenAutorenSeiten
- I–IV Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis I–IV
- 205–206 EDITORIAL Suzanne S. Schüttemeyer Suzanne S. Schüttemeyer 205–206
- 207–371 DOKUMENTATION UND ANALYSEN 207–371
  - 207–222 Deutscher Bundestag 1998 bis 2017/18: Parlaments- und Wahlstatistik für die 14 . bis beginnende 19 . Wahlperiode Michael F. Feldkamp Michael F. Feldkamp 207–222
  - 223–242 Die Bundestagswahl 2017 im Spiegel der repräsentativen Wahlstatistik Eckhard Jesse Eckhard Jesse 223–242
  - 243–264 Ein komplexes Gebilde. Eine sozio-ökonomische Analyse des Ergebnisses der AfD bei der Bundestagswahl 2017 Knut Bergmann, Matthias Diermeier, Judith Niehues Knut Bergmann, Matthias Diermeier, Judith Niehues 243–264
  - 265–285 Parteienwettbewerb und Koalitionsbildung in Deutschland 2017/18: Eine Analyse der Wahlprogramme Simon Jakobs, Uwe Jun Simon Jakobs, Uwe Jun 265–285
  - 286–303 Die Entwicklung des deutschen Parteiensystems. Zur Bedeutung kurzfristiger Faktoren im Jahrzehnt des europäischen Wandels Oskar Niedermayer Oskar Niedermayer 286–303
  - 304–324 Mitgliederparteien – Niedergang ohne Ende? Elmar Wiesendahl, Benjamin Höhne, Malte Cordes Elmar Wiesendahl, Benjamin Höhne, Malte Cordes 304–324
  - 325–345 Freie Wähler zwischen Partei und Wählergemeinschaft. Mitglieder, Identität und Organisation Jens Walther, Michael Angenendt Jens Walther, Michael Angenendt 325–345
  - 346–371 Parteimitgliedschaften im Jahre 2017 Oskar Niedermayer Oskar Niedermayer 346–371
- 372–436 AUFSÄTZE 372–436
  - 372–406 Die Bundestagswahl 2017: GroKo IV – ohne Alternative für Deutschland Richard Hilmer, Jérémie Gagné Richard Hilmer, Jérémie Gagné 372–406
  - 407–436 Regierungsbildung „wider Willen“ – der mühsame Weg zur Koalition nach der Bundestagswahl 2017 Sven T. Siefken Sven T. Siefken 407–436
- 437–445 REZENSIONEN 437–445
- 446–446 MITTEILUNG 446–446
- 447–450 ABSTRACTS 447–450
Durchsuchen Sie das Werk
Geben Sie ein Keyword in die Suchleiste ein
Kein Zugriff

ZParl Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen , Seite 265 - 285

Parteienwettbewerb und Koalitionsbildung in Deutschland 2017/18: Eine Analyse der Wahlprogramme

Autoren

Simon Jakobs Uwe Jun

DOI
- doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2018-2-265
- ISSN print: 0340-1758
- ISSN online: 0340-1758
Abstract

The 2017 German federal election was followed by a series of coalition talks that, since World War II, were unprecedented . After the exploratory talks between CDU/CSU, FDP and Bündnis 90/Die Grünen had failed, CDU/CSU and SPD started to open negotiations . This decision stood in straight opposition to what the Social Democrats had declared immediately after the election results had been publicized, which was not to be available for coalition talks . An analysis of the parties’ electoral platforms shows that the programmatic positions of CDU/CSU, FDP and Bündnis 90/Die Grünen were set widely apart and that a coalition of these four parties would have demanded heavy concessions from all of the coalition partners . CDU/CSU’s and SPD’s platforms were closer together, which made forming and entering a new Grand Coalition more likely than the originally discussed alliance . However, CDU/CSU and SPD differ much more from each other than is often portrayed by the media . Both parties had to agree to quite some compromises in order to obtain a governing majority as it is necessary in parliamentary democracies .

Zusammenfassung

The 2017 German federal election was followed by a series of coalition talks that, since World War II, were unprecedented . After the exploratory talks between CDU/CSU, FDP and Bündnis 90/Die Grünen had failed, CDU/CSU and SPD started to open negotiations . This decision stood in straight opposition to what the Social Democrats had declared immediately after the election results had been publicized, which was not to be available for coalition talks . An analysis of the parties’ electoral platforms shows that the programmatic positions of CDU/CSU, FDP and Bündnis 90/Die Grünen were set widely apart and that a coalition of these four parties would have demanded heavy concessions from all of the coalition partners . CDU/CSU’s and SPD’s platforms were closer together, which made forming and entering a new Grand Coalition more likely than the originally discussed alliance . However, CDU/CSU and SPD differ much more from each other than is often portrayed by the media . Both parties had to agree to quite some compromises in order to obtain a governing majority as it is necessary in parliamentary democracies .
Teilen